- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:27 am to LSBoosie
Thanks for the recommendations! 
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:31 am to LSBoosie
Thanks Boosie. The accident reconstruction company will get obliterated is my guess.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:31 am to JDPndahizzy
damn.. recess already?
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:42 am to JDPndahizzy
And it a lengthy one too. They went to the side bar for a little while regarding the CW motion to preclude the defense from mentioning ARCCA in opening statement.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:44 am to civiltiger07
"honorable" auntie bev.
She is part of the same dirty rotten core there in the Commonwealth.
She is part of the same dirty rotten core there in the Commonwealth.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:46 am to jclem11
quote:
She is part of the same dirty rotten core there in the Commonwealth.
I just think she is ignorant to many aspects of this case. She said that she didn’t understand the ARCCA report.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:48 am to jclem11
Thanks. I didn't watch any of Burkhart during the first trial, but I will be trying her out some for this one.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:50 am to LSBoosie
No problem. It's personal preference but I enjoy Andrea's commentary more than Emily D. Baker.
Could just be a style or personality but I just vibe with Andrea more so figured others in the thread might too.
Andrea is not as big on YouTube.
Could just be a style or personality but I just vibe with Andrea more so figured others in the thread might too.
Andrea is not as big on YouTube.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 8:57 am to jclem11
I'm always open to new people. I think I heard about her while listening to Lawyer You Know during last trial, but never got around to listening. I'm going to listen to her today in the background while at work.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:03 am to AlxTgr
I just finished watching the HBO show on this trial. What am I missing as this new trial starts. What is the big reveal here? I find it hard to believe that the people in the house beat him to death, then planted evidence. Saying that, I don't necessarily believe that she hit him. Although that is more believable than the other possibility to me. I believe she'll be found guilty this time around, even though it's not rock solid that she did it.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:04 am to Kracka
quote:
I find it hard to believe that the people in the house beat him to death, then planted evidence.
Cops NEVER plant evidence. EVAR!
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:09 am to idlewatcher
quote:
Cops NEVER plant evidence. EVAR!
Of course they don't.....lol. But to me, what was a very pro Karen Read documentary, didn't really go into motive or detail of how and why they killed him. There were some ideas thrown around like beating him to death in the basement, and letting the dog get him. But no complete narrative from what I remember from the show.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:16 am to Kracka
The physical evidence is not consistent with the Commonwealth's theory of the case. That's my main concern with this.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:17 am to KosmoCramer
This new dude is as dull as Lally.
I’m falling asleep and bored to tears.
I’m falling asleep and bored to tears.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:21 am to KosmoCramer
quote:
The physical evidence is not consistent with the Commonwealth's theory of the case
I agree
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:26 am to Kracka
quote:
Saying that, I don't necessarily believe that she hit him. Although that is more believable than the other possibility to me. I believe she'll be found guilty this time around, even though it's not rock solid that she did it.
That’s reasonable doubt.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:28 am to Kracka
quote:
. I believe she'll be found guilty this time around, even though it's not rock solid that she did it.
Woah buddy!
You don't understand the assignment. Thank God you aren't on this jury.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:42 am to jclem11
This dude is going to prove KR INTENTIONALLY drove into John?
X to doubt.
X to doubt.
Posted on 4/22/25 at 9:44 am to jclem11
quote:
This dude is going to prove KR INTENTIONALLY drove into John?
X to doubt.
I think he's saying that she knew she hit him, didn't know he was dead, but then engaged in a coverup of her reckless behavior.
Page 36 of 159
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News