- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:08 am to Gris Gris
quote:
Why would you hate the whole city over this? You point out yourself that the city's citizens didn't consent.
I hear people saying they will boycott the city over the monuments issue. I don't understand the thought process behind that. First of all, half of them probably don't go to the city that much anyway. Additionally, why try to intentionally hurt businesses which do not support the issue?
I dont hate the city...I just hate the pandering asshat in charge. .
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:09 am to CarRamrod
quote:
t is not a fair ruling. the "Jude" knows there is a bill in congress about the statures...... IF he was fair he would suspend any removal efforts and allow Congress to decide.
From what I read, this was not the issue. The issue was ownership of the land and statue as I understood the filing.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:12 am to Gris Gris
quote:
From what I read, this was not the issue. The issue was ownership of the land and statue as I understood the filing.
yes... it's all over who owns that particular spot of land where the Beauregard statue is
esp. since, according to the Monument Task Force, the Historical Society paperwork lists it as being on private property
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:12 am to CarRamrod
quote:
It is not a fair ruling. the "Jude" knows there is a bill in congress about the statures...... IF he was fair he would suspend any removal efforts and allow Congress to decide.
That has absolutely nothing to do with the basis of the suit,nor can he consider that.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:16 am to The Levee
quote:
but someone did Overdose on Cocaine in OPP.
Yes, three months ago. Tell us more.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:17 am to tLSU
quote:absolutely he can. Louisiana has Judges releasing convicted child molesters out on the streets before sentencing. of course he can halt some monuments being taken down and let the State Congress weigh in on it.
That has absolutely nothing to do with the basis of the suit,nor can he consider that.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:19 am to The Levee
I'm not shocked there are drugs in OPP, I am surprised there is so much quantity available that someone could od on coke.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:23 am to Gris Gris
quote:
Why would you hate the whole city over this? You point out yourself that the city's citizens didn't consent.
Did the citizens elect Mitch as their mayor? The only way politicians will be held responsible for their actions is when it hurts the pocket book of those with influence.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:23 am to CarRamrod
quote:
absolutely he can. Louisiana has Judges releasing convicted child molesters out on the streets before sentencing. of course he can halt some monuments being taken down and let the State Congress weigh in on it.
while I wish they could... it seems that he actually can not
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:24 am to CarRamrod
quote:
absolutely he can. Louisiana has Judges releasing convicted child molesters out on the streets before sentencing. of course he can halt some monuments being taken down and let the State Congress weigh in on it.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:27 am to UpToPar
quote:
Did the citizens elect Mitch as their mayor?
I must have missed the parts of his campaign platform where he indicated he was going to focus his energies ridiculous stunts like removing 140 year old statues.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:29 am to Gris Gris
So the judge denied the injunction request even though the paperwork showed the statue and land was privately owned?
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:31 am to Chad504boy
Beauregard and Lee are both registered with the NPS as National Historic Sites. Until the city applies for historic status removal, I don't see how they can be taken down.
The U.S. dept of Interior as well as the LA Dept. of Culture, Recreation & Tourism may have to get involved. One letter is all it would take.
The U.S. dept of Interior as well as the LA Dept. of Culture, Recreation & Tourism may have to get involved. One letter is all it would take.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:33 am to Chad504boy
I don't think I've hated a political figure in my life as much as Mitch.
Yes, more than Hillary even.
Yes, more than Hillary even.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:34 am to Dont_Call_Me_RAY
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:36 am to rt3
is it ordinary for a judge to stamp the order 4 times?
(this was from Monday)
(this was from Monday)
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:37 am to rt3
First one is for Fairness. Next 3 are symbolic for the number of statues.
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:38 am to Chad504boy
missed this on Monday too
Posted on 5/10/17 at 11:38 am to Das Jackal
By all means stay away, we don't want you or any of you people that don't even live here trying to tell us what should ne done.
Also, you realize that taking the statue away doesn't erase history, right? The Civil War still happened, we're just choosing not to display figures that fought to keep people as slaves and to leave this great country called the USA that I am proud as hell to live in.
Also, you realize that taking the statue away doesn't erase history, right? The Civil War still happened, we're just choosing not to display figures that fought to keep people as slaves and to leave this great country called the USA that I am proud as hell to live in.
Page 2 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News