- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
0
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:04 am to lsu777
quote:
but like you said...AI is a tool in the tool box, experience still matters a ton.
Well it's more a set of tools in the toolbox, which you alluded to earlier in your post.
There isn't one form of AI. There are many different AI tools.
Needing to know when you need a hand screwdriver, electronic drill, or an impact driver makes a large difference, even though the function itself is the same thing. That's a bad analogy but with the tactile tool concept the tool options are limited
AI is going to be great for smart people who understand the totality of what it is and how to use it to amplify their output.
AI is going to be devastating to people who use it to be lazy.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:10 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
Well it's more a set of tools in the toolbox, which you alluded to earlier in your post.
There isn't one form of AI. There are many different AI tools.
Needing to know when you need a hand screwdriver, electronic drill, or an impact driver makes a large difference, even though the function itself is the same thing. That's a bad analogy but with the tactile tool concept the tool options are limited
AI is going to be great for smart people who understand the totality of what it is and how to use it to amplify their output.
AI is going to be devastating to people who use it to be lazy.
thing is if you understand how to use AI...it is already absolutely amazing and can make you 10x more productive. but as alluded to...if you dont have the understanding on how to prompt it...can be a huge time suck too making you less productive
its going to be just like you said...the smart people are going to use AI to further their careers and productivity furthering the gap between the haves and have nots.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:15 am to lsu777
quote:
.if you dont have the understanding on how to prompt it...can be a huge time suck too making you less productive
To loop this back into the lawyer scenario, having to go and check every citation in a brief AI writes for you has to take as much, if not more, time than actually writing the brief.
Now, the legal research companies have AI-assisted stuff, and I imagine they have it refined within their legal databases, and I imagine QC to eliminate hallucinations. But those options are expensive (although, in line with this $499/mo option this idiot in OP was paying for).
But most of the lawyers we see busted for hallucinations are just typing shite into ChatGPT and copying the results. I'm not even sure if this is an efficient option with all of the time it takes to review citations.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:23 am to Spankum
quote:
I didn’t know there was a problem with lawyers using AI. AI is a fact of life in the modern world.
They can use AI, they just can't do things like have AI write a brief and then not check it lol
They could have AI write a brief, then they must go over it, check for accuracy, change wording and such.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:33 am to UFFan
Are these judges putting the smackdown because the content goes completely against the laws or just because it came from AI?
Just wondering if these outrage is over the content or the source, i.e. it sucks arse but if it had came from the lawyers interns unvetted then the judge would have just let it go.
Just wondering if these outrage is over the content or the source, i.e. it sucks arse but if it had came from the lawyers interns unvetted then the judge would have just let it go.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:36 am to forkedintheroad
They’re citing case law that isn’t real. The source doesn’t matter.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:36 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
Are these judges putting the smackdown because the content goes completely against the laws or just because it came from AI?
The content. The AI is manufacturing fake caselaw to argue from.
Posted on 6/12/26 at 7:37 am to forkedintheroad
quote:
Are these judges putting the smackdown because the content goes completely against the laws or just because it came from AI?
The way the law works is you use prior decisions as authority to guide the judge.
The AI is just making shite up as cases to "support" the argument being made. It may or may not conflict with the actual law, but the fake citation has no value. The system cannot deal with having to fact check every citation like that, so the use of fake citations (via AI or otherwise) has always led to punitive responses by the courts and licensing agencies.
It is like a cop arresting someone for a factual basis the cop made up. Could that factual basis potentially apply to reality? Yes. Can we permit cops the leeway to arrest people based on their fantasies? No.
Page 3 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News