Started By
Message

re: It's Official: 2028 Olympics in Los Angeles

Posted on 9/13/17 at 6:24 pm to
Posted by Ed Osteen
Member since Oct 2007
59350 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 6:24 pm to
quote:

2028 games come around are currently only 7 years old.


They are actually way younger than 7 for the 2028 games
Posted by SirWinston
Say NO to War
Member since Jul 2014
104464 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 6:24 pm to
Obama couldn't get Olympics in 8 years and was 0/2. TRUMP lands them in 8 months
This post was edited on 9/13/17 at 6:25 pm
Posted by kywildcatfanone
Wildcat Country!
Member since Oct 2012
141226 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 7:03 pm to
I'm pretty sure LA was the only place that wanted it.
Posted by Vegas Eddie
The Quad
Member since Dec 2013
6084 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 7:06 pm to
LA won't even support their NFL team
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 7:07 pm to
quote:

Don't get me wrong, I enjoy seeing people compete in the games, but I think it would be less corrupt of an organization if the politics of where to host the Olympics is taken out.



And sadly it's nowhere near as corrupt as FIFA. Honestly I think that the officials of FIFA should be charged with crimes against humanity, particularly the ones who voted in favor of Qatar hosting the World Cup, and then be executed for it immediately after they are found guilty. There will be 4,000 deaths due to that decision, which is higher than 9/11. The executives at FIFA absolutely should be executed for that.
This post was edited on 9/13/17 at 7:15 pm
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 7:11 pm to
quote:

Pretty sure the U.S. is the only place it actually pulls a profit. Think I read that somewhere. The idiocy of hosting it in 2nd and 3rd world countries should be abolished. It should be a fricking crime.



Having lived in Beijing, I would be shocked if they also didn't financially benefit off of it. It made a great deal of sense to let them host the Winter Olympics since there's no way in hell it would end up like Sochi. The problem is it doesn't snow much in Beijing since it's on the edge of grasslands and desert, so they'll in all likelihood have to create that from scratch, and unless they go far more north than Beijing, I can't possibly see where within a hundred miles of Beijing that they could do cross country skiing.

EDIT: Just checked and they made a billion dollars off of it. Only the Vancouver Winter Olympics were more profitable.
This post was edited on 9/13/17 at 7:17 pm
Posted by dkreller
Laffy
Member since Jan 2009
34303 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 7:13 pm to

Did they just assume that all angels are female?

THE OUTRAGE!!!!
Posted by Vegas Eddie
The Quad
Member since Dec 2013
6084 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 7:17 pm to
quote:

EDIT: Just checked and they made a billion dollars off of it. Only the Vancouver Winter Olympics were more profitable.



Sure they did
Posted by OMLandshark
Member since Apr 2009
120445 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 7:20 pm to
quote:

Sure they did



Beijing was a fricking shithole before they were rewarded the Olympics. It greatly streamlined their infrastructure, economy, and population to embrace the Western world. They moved all the factories out of the city solely due to the Olympics. There's no doubt in my mind or anyone who has ever lived there that China greatly profited from the Olympics. It's not like Athens that went to shite. A billion I think is on the low immediate end on how they benefited from them.
This post was edited on 9/13/17 at 7:22 pm
Posted by rt3
now in the piney woods of Pineville
Member since Apr 2011
148024 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 7:26 pm to
quote:

Such as?

I think this has something to do with it

quote:

The private LA 2028 bid committee has vowed to control costs by using existing venues such as the Coliseum and Staples Center, as well as the Rams’ stadium currently under construction in Inglewood. Bid leaders have emphasized that the city’s two previous Games, in 1932 and 1984, were financially successful


LA Times

the last number of Olympics all had new facilities in a relatively small area

if LA is using a lot of already existing facilities or a more expansive area... that would be a big concession by the IOC
Posted by Pedro
Geaux Hawks
Member since Jul 2008
39313 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 8:01 pm to
facilities. alot of the kickbacks to the IOC were conceeded. im not sure what else. there was an article somewhere when the initial award decision was released that described it.
Posted by ElderTiger
Planet Earth
Member since Dec 2010
7882 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 8:02 pm to
How is California going to pay for this ?
Posted by Fight4LSU
Kenner
Member since Jul 2005
10078 posts
Posted on 9/13/17 at 8:06 pm to
This post makes me wonder, in those 11 years, which event could you work on mastering full time to compete in by 2028?

I think with 11 years of full time training, I could be an Olympian in Archery.

Posted by sugar71
NOLA
Member since Jun 2012
9967 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 12:15 am to
quote:

the last number of Olympics all had new facilities in a relatively small area

if LA is using a lot of already existing facilities or a more expansive area... that would be a big concession by the IOC


NPR had a great story on this last month. The 1984 L.A. Olympics had a nearly $250 million dollar surplus.

L.A. is the most venue ready city in the world(only 2 other cities come close). UCLA dorms/campus will serve as the Olympic village. The only major venue that will need to be built is the Aqautic/swimming venue. And private sponsors will probably help build it like in 84(McDonald's).
Posted by BuckeyeFan87
Columbus
Member since Dec 2007
25249 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 6:21 am to



Will be going
Posted by ellunchboxo
G-Town
Member since Feb 2009
19539 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 6:37 am to
Me too. My daughter will be the same age I was when it was in Atlanta and I didn't get to go. Will be awesome.
Posted by Cdawg
TigerFred's Living Room
Member since Sep 2003
62219 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 7:04 am to
quote:

LA put on the most successful Olympics in modern history from a financial point of view in 1980

1984. !980 was Moscow and Jimmy boycotted. IN '84, the Russians boycotted.

quote:

Hell, for the people who were around then, wasn't the talk about the Olympics back then was how they were never going to survive into the 21st century because of costs and then the LA Olympics happened and it rejuvenated the interest?

No, see above. But the olympics survived. I remember IOC officials complaining that Atlanta was too commercialized all they while the corrupt officials were on the take from competing cities.

There are only a few cities that are able to host without it being a huge burden on the cities. LA is definitely one of them.
This post was edited on 9/14/17 at 7:09 am
Posted by mostbesttigerfanever
TD platinum member suite in TS
Member since Jan 2010
5034 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 7:32 am to
I kind of like the poster
Posted by PsychTiger
Member since Jul 2004
110712 posts
Posted on 9/14/17 at 8:15 am to
quote:

Think about this. The female gymnasts bodies that the OT Is going to be talking about when the 2028 games come around are currently only 7 years old. Makes you guys seem perverted.


I didn't think about that, you did.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 2Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram