Started By
Message

re: It takes more than $55k to live secure in BR

Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:06 am to
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36481 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:06 am to
quote:

No that's not what I meant. I don't think it's at all hard to live quite comfortably for a dual income household on $55K.


Oh, I can't speak on that, because I don't have kids and make more than 55k

When I was single making 55k I felt quite comfortable and saved a ton.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
88873 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:08 am to
quote:

When I was single making 55k I felt quite comfortable and saved a ton.


ain't that the truth
Posted by Tiger Ryno
#WoF
Member since Feb 2007
107554 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:11 am to
55k? not a lot to live on anywhere if you are supporting a family of 4.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
297219 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:11 am to
quote:

A family with two adults and two children must take home at least about $63,648 each year to be economically secure; the amount of money needed to ensure families have basic essentials and live a modest but dignified life.


Who defines this?
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18889 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:24 am to
quote:

I made the same this past year, no kids and I live paycheck to paycheck basically. I have like $7 in my savings.


I suspect a lot of people in your situation have a giant car note, and possibly even pay too much for housing. Throw in going out frequently and it is easy to blow through cash.

Posted by thesoccerfanjax
Member since Nov 2013
6128 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:29 am to
quote:

55k? not a lot to live on anywhere if you are supporting a family of 4.


Then why would you have two kids if you can't really afford it? I'm not sympathetic to those people but I am sympathetic to the kids if they are TRULY going without. Especially if the parents have iPads and iPhones and new cars.
This post was edited on 1/14/15 at 11:30 am
Posted by yellowfin
Coastal Bar
Member since May 2006
98767 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:33 am to
I could cut lots out of my budget if I needed to, could probably get it down to 55k
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:36 am to
quote:

quote:
Makes sense - The ole lady and I make a little over $100,000 together in DFW with one kid and barely get by.


I made the same this past year, no kids and I live paycheck to paycheck basically. I have like $7 in my savings.



You're definitely doing (or did) something wrong.
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18889 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:43 am to
Health insurance costs are the real killer when you start a family. Affordable housing in a safe area can also be difficult to come by if you have a lower middle class income.

However I think cars are the one area that most middle class folk over extend themselves.

My wife and I are in the 70-80 K range. We live in a modest home with 1 kid, and don't have a car payment. Frankly, I don't feel like I can save a responsible amount AND afford even a used car payment.

We also cut cable last summer, and we are still looking for ways to cut back.
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
58517 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:47 am to
I don't understand why people want to live in big cities. There's plenty of jobs in small towns at the paper mill and the feed store.
Posted by foshizzle
Washington DC metro
Member since Mar 2008
40599 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:49 am to
Fortunately, the news story provides a link to the study itself. Going through it I can see some pretty big problems with their numbers.

quote:

Child care costs are presented in 2014 inflation-adjusted dollars based on the 75th percentile weekly rate for center-based care at a
Class A center.


In other words, only the best for Junior. They also assume any school-age kids will be going to day care both before and after school.

Their healthcare cost estimates seemed high, and I quickly figured out why:

quote:

Estimated costs of premiums are based on the total cost of an employer-sponsored insurance plan, not just the employee contributions


There may be more but I don't have the time.
Posted by BRgetthenet
Member since Oct 2011
118233 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:49 am to
The profit margins on feed are ludicrous.

Don't even get me started on seeds.
Posted by EveryonesACoach
Baton Rouge
Member since Nov 2012
896 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:50 am to
How are they defining "modest but dignified". I just took a look at my Mint budgets, which is broken down by all of the "necessities". My wife and my daughter can "get by" on a budget of $3000 a month, or $36k a year. Those "necessities" include two car notes (could be lower) cell phones (could be lower), student loans (not everyone has these) and a mortgage. Gas groceries utilities all factored in. I say that's pretty "modest but dignified" and that's $36k for the year. I earn the right to have nicer things than that, and if I made less, I would spend less. It's called fricking priorities.
Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
41835 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:50 am to
Govt. has been "officially" fighting poverty since the War on Poverty was launched by LBJ.

It's a war that the govt. really doesn't want to win because if they erased poverty in this country, many bureaucrats would lose their jobs and politicians would lose control over our taxes.

Consequently, poverty keeps getting redefined to justify bigger and bigger govt.

This seems like an attempt to move the poverty line up to 55K a year. I know its semantics, but all of a sudden leading a "secure" life is the goal and not reducing poverty.

Furthermore, when you see it written that this place has the most or this has the least; keep in mind that there is always the best and there is always the worst. Whether BR is second to highest, third to highest or the highest is irrelevant because in this case the differences are probably insignificant and chances are people who live in bigger cities like BR, NO, or Lafayette enjoy more opportunities and have a better quality of life than people in smaller communities who don't have as many libraries, parks, hospitals, schools, etc.

Posted by GreatLakesTiger24
Member since May 2012
59142 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:52 am to
you can make $750/week for the rest of your life at the factory!
Posted by Bmath
LA
Member since Aug 2010
18889 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:52 am to
quote:

$36K


Which before taxes would put you in the $55k range.
Posted by thesoccerfanjax
Member since Nov 2013
6128 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:53 am to
Maybe it's just me or maybe it's other factors. But I feel like you don't see regular middle class people driving OLD vehicles anymore like you used to. At my building, almost every car is shiny and new (not an easy task in the FL sun) besides my wife's car and my truck.
Posted by thesoccerfanjax
Member since Nov 2013
6128 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:54 am to
Not everyone has car notes, either.
Posted by 777Tiger
Member since Mar 2011
88873 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:55 am to
quote:

Which before taxes would put you in the $55k range.

thought the article said they need to take home 63k?
This post was edited on 1/14/15 at 11:56 am
Posted by el Gaucho
He/They
Member since Dec 2010
58517 posts
Posted on 1/14/15 at 11:57 am to
i really like driving the forklift
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram