Started By
Message

re: It boggles my mind how people scared to death of the virus

Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:46 am to
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53804 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:46 am to
quote:

Korkstand


What evidence do you have that states masks work? If the reintroduction of lockdown policies have told us anything, it's that masks, social distancing, and shutting down small businesses does NOTHING to stop Coronavirus. So why are we still doing it?
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28897 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:49 am to
There's a huge fricking difference between recognizing that protecting the eyes increases protection, and trying to argue that respiratory protection is worthless if you don't also protect the eyes like OP is trying to do.


You understand that, right?
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
87112 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:50 am to
quote:

What evidence do you have that states masks work? If the reintroduction of lockdown policies have told us anything, it's that masks, social distancing, and shutting down small businesses does NOTHING to stop Coronavirus. So why are we still doing it?


Clearly the lockdowns slow down the spread, but it obviously doesn’t stop it, and once you’re re-opened, it’s right back to spreading again.
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53804 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:52 am to
quote:

Clearly the lockdowns slow down the spread,


How does it "clearly" slow down the spread?

quote:

but it obviously doesn’t stop it, and once you’re re-opened, it’s right back to spreading again.


So i guess the answer is, lockdowns forever? Unless you're in government, of course.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
84300 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:54 am to
quote:

How does it "clearly" slow down the spread?


less human movement/interaction is going to slow the spread

seems like common sense

quote:

So i guess the answer is, lockdowns forever? Unless you're in government, of course.


I doubt this is what slack was arguing here

I don't think a single person in this thread (or on this board really) has argued for further lockdowns
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
99673 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:54 am to
quote:

Clearly the lockdowns slow down the spread
I honestly dont think thats true

I think peoples fear helped stop the spread. Private gatherings is leading the spread, and the only thing that stops that is peoples own choices. Restaurants, workplace, etc, all the things they locked down, are minimal to the spread

Even "science" admits that now, but they order more lockdowns for the sake of "doing something"
This post was edited on 12/4/20 at 9:56 am
Posted by Blaeke
Member since Dec 2016
1029 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:55 am to
Masks are the perfect political solution. As in, they're hardly a solution at all, but politically it looks good. There's a common sense notion to the general public that covering your mouth and nose will deny entry to a respiratory virus leaving only the "crackpots" to argue the efficaciousness of masks.

If the spread accelerates, the politician can blame and scold the populace for not following the mandate. If the spread trends downwards as it naturally exhausts possible hosts, the politician can boast that the approach was a success.
Posted by Aubie Spr96
lolwut?
Member since Dec 2009
41987 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:56 am to
quote:

this just does not change my life in the slightest.



Ah, so now we have a working definition of 'life altering'. Good to know that the only life altering things in the universe are things that Korkstand deems so.

The Spanish Flu was just 100 years ago. H1N1 was far more recent. No national mask mandates for either.
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28897 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:57 am to
quote:

What evidence do you have that states masks work?
Literally everything that we know about disease transmission and physics tells us that they offer some degree of protection. At the very least they reduce the change of spreading from a person who is contagious (and may not know it).

Nobody is saying that they offer perfect protection, far from it. But like washing your hands, covering your mouth when you sneeze/cough, and just generally keeping your body fluids and germs contained to yourself, we're all just a bit better off.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
99673 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 9:58 am to
quote:

But like washing your hands, covering your mouth when you sneeze/cough,
Then why havent those things been mandated as well?
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
84300 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:00 am to
I'm trying to envision stores having hand wash stations like we had in elementary school at the entrance

This post was edited on 12/4/20 at 10:01 am
Posted by Korkstand
Member since Nov 2003
28897 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:01 am to
quote:

Ah, so now we have a working definition of 'life altering'. Good to know that the only life altering things in the universe are things that Korkstand deems so.
How's your reading comprehension? I said that the definition is obviously subjective a few posts back, so I don't see the point in arguing over it. Yet you keep on.
quote:

The Spanish Flu was just 100 years ago. H1N1 was far more recent. No national mask mandates for either.
There are no national mandates for covid, either, it's state by state (or city by city). Just like for spanish flu 100 years ago.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
99673 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:02 am to
quote:

I'm trying to envision stores having hand wash stations like we had in elementary school at the entrance
My point stands

Handwashign is 100% the best defense against this virus and all viruses. Yet, that hasnt been mandated

You know why? There is no "show" for handwashing. There is no "signal" of "doing something" like you get with masks
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
87112 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:02 am to
quote:

How does it "clearly" slow down the spread?


Look at the daily cases in LA - they slow down after lock downs and pick up after reopening. Pretty straight forward.
quote:

o i guess the answer is, lockdowns forever? Unless you're in government, of course.


Not at all. My opinion has always been to open fully. People should be allowed to decide if they want to leave home.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
84300 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:04 am to
quote:

Handwashign is 100% the best defense against this virus and all viruses.


is it? serious question

I thought there has been some debate about how long COVID survives on surfaces and in airspace

quote:

You know why? There is no "show" for handwashing. There is no "signal" of "doing something" like you get with masks


of course

Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53804 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:04 am to
quote:

less human movement/interaction is going to slow the spread

seems like common sense


Yet it hasn't.

quote:

I doubt this is what slack was arguing here

I don't think a single person in this thread (or on this board really) has argued for further lockdowns



If the only way to "stop the spread" is for lockdowns, then that is the only option. Because masks aren't doing shite.
Posted by lsupride87
Member since Dec 2007
99673 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Just like for spanish flu 100 years ago.
Interesting you bring that up

San Fran was one of only 7 cities that had a mask mandate for Spanish flu

It was also one of the hardest hit areas in the entire country, with 30 in every 1,000 residents dying. Science!
Posted by BugAC
St. George
Member since Oct 2007
53804 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:05 am to
quote:

is it? serious question


Handwashing and good hygiene is basic health and sanitation 101. Regardless of the virus/disease, proper hygiene prevents disease.
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6634 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:05 am to
quote:

If everyone wears a mask, then...

there should not be any droplets in the air to reach the eyes.
Mask compliance is well over 90% in most areas.

COVID is still going through a surge.

Masks don't work against aerosolized virus particles that hang in the air. Aerosolized particles are orders of magnitude smaller than the fibers on your cloth masks, not even counting the gaps where the mask doesn't fit the contours of your face. Its like throwing a grain of sand at a chain link fence and expecting the fence to stop it.

ETA: Droplets fall to the ground within seconds. Unless you are within 3' of someone coughing, droplets aren't much of a concern.
This post was edited on 12/4/20 at 10:08 am
Posted by slackster
Houston
Member since Mar 2009
87112 posts
Posted on 12/4/20 at 10:05 am to
quote:

Literally everything that we know about disease transmission and physics tells us that they offer some degree of protection. At the very least they reduce the change of spreading from a person who is contagious (and may not know it).


The problem with masks is that they make perfect sense on paper (covering your mouth/nose should slow transmission of things coming from your mouth/nose), but zero sense in practice. Studies have shown that to be the case.

If someone thinks masks work, I don’t blame them, because the logic says they should.

If someone thinks masks are useless, I don’t blame them, because the real world says they’re correct.
Jump to page
Page First 4 5 6 7 8 ... 12
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 12Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram