Started By
Message

Is There More Flooding Caused By Growth & Infrastructure?

Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:42 am
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113890 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:42 am
Between the flood in 2016, the flooding a few months ago, etc. Is this caused by outside factors (other than it raining a lot).

Where I live my street rarely flooded. When it did, it was because it rained really hard for a relatively long time and even then as soon as it slacked up any, it drained pretty quick.

Right outside of my neighborhood, which use to be soybean fields is now a new neighborhood being built. Ever since they started that project, my street seems to get more high water in certain spots that was never a problem in the past.

Behind my house use to be a field that led into a wooded area. Someone bought the land behind my house and built individual apartments (the first one built is a duplex, but then the guy started building individual apartments thats like small homes). Ever since they were built, I get water in my backyard. When it was an empty field water would never back up.

So thinking about that happening on a larger scale, how big of a factor is new construction and infrastructure contributing to flooding?

Of course you have people who think the weather "is getting worse" because its flooding in places it never has.. And when it comes to climate change, the climate has always changed. That's a natural process (the ice age is a good example), but I don't think things have changed that much that all of a sudden it is causing more "catastrophe", then again I am not a scientist.

But for the civil engineers, people in the environmental field, etc.. Are "we" underestimating the impact new construction and infrastructure growth is having on existing areas?
Posted by Cosmo
glassman's guest house
Member since Oct 2003
120165 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:42 am to
Yes. More concrete means less open land to suck up water
Posted by jimbeam
University of LSU
Member since Oct 2011
75703 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:43 am to
“The most expensive storm ever!!”

More money in the area than ever
Posted by crewdepoo
Hogwarts
Member since Jan 2015
9580 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:45 am to
Wetland mitigation is cheap.
Posted by jmarto1
Houma, LA/ Las Vegas, NV
Member since Mar 2008
33848 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:45 am to
More statues need to go obviously
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:47 am to
quote:

And when it comes to climate change, the climate has always changed. That's a natural process (the ice age is a good example),



Literally no one with any knowledge has ever claimed that our climate is static. People really need to stop saying this.

Posted by Joshjrn
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2008
26977 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:48 am to
quote:

Yes. More concrete means less open land to suck up water


/thread
Posted by redstick13
Lower Saxony
Member since Feb 2007
38449 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:49 am to
Remove all the concrete in BR and NOLA. Problem solved.
Posted by Screaming Viking
Member since Jul 2013
4438 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:51 am to
The short answer is, yes. As cosmo said, more concrete, less places that the water can go.

The other part of the problem is that municipalities rarely maintain the cleanliness of the drain lines. While Jefferson P has 1 or 2 vacuum trucks, it is almost impossible to maintain the entire parish worth of drain lines.

Maintenance, and crappy installation by crappy contractors is the other part of the problem.
Posted by Salmon
On the trails
Member since Feb 2008
83517 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:51 am to
quote:

But for the civil engineers, people in the environmental field, etc.. Are "we" underestimating the impact new construction and infrastructure growth is having on existing areas?


No. Not anymore.

quote:

Of course you have people who think the weather "is getting worse" because its flooding in places it never has.. And when it comes to climate change, the climate has always changed. That's a natural process (the ice age is a good example), but I don't think things have changed that much that all of a sudden it is causing more "catastrophe", then again I am not a scientist.



frick you're dumb.
Posted by The Cool No 9
70816
Member since Jan 2014
9947 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 9:52 am to
OweO that was actually a theory I developed a couple weeks after the floods.

But people should lend a hand in clearing culverts and storm water drains every bit helps
Posted by Finchboyz
Choclate city
Member since May 2018
514 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:03 am to
Part of it is that there is more impermeable pavements than before and another part of it is more utilities tying into a drainage system that is now drastically undersized for the new amount of volume it receives.
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113890 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:03 am to
Yeah I understand that, but what about drainage systems?

For example, when a new neighborhood is being built, what do they do for drainage.

I am using the area around my house as an example. The area behind myself where apartments were built, there was nothing done in terms of drainage, but it has one road and ten individual apartments and one duplex. There is a small ditch right behind my fence that leads to a much bigger ditch so the area in my backyard that gets higher than it use to (its not a threat to getting in my house are anything) is contributed to the building of those apartments AND in other areas because the big ditch fills up a lot faster.

But I guess what I am asking is.. Lets say a new neighborhood is about to be built, what can be done to create a better drainage system and should their be codes that require some sort of drainage system to be installed (for example.. in certain areas have ditches that are under the neighborhoods or have an a small lake.. well that starts off as a huge hole that all the water in the neighborhood drains to).
Posted by OweO
Plaquemine, La
Member since Sep 2009
113890 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:15 am to
quote:


frick you're dumb.


Why does that make me dumb? I said I am not a scientist or in any position to make an educated theory of what is going on with our climate or "global warming".. Whatever. It has become a political topic in which people dumber than I am give their opinion.. I am simply saying I don't know enough to really factor it into my opinion.

With that said, I do know there is climate change, there are people who think its all "a bunch of bullshite", but I am saying that's about as far as my knowledge goes. I know there is climate change, whether it is gradual, whether it is something that is a big problem in which humans have made worse, etc.. I don't know. Not sure why this makes me dumb, but okay.
Posted by GREENHEAD22
Member since Nov 2009
19582 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:26 am to
Do you live under a rock?

Over development and piss poor planning is the leading cause of most flooding issues especially in LA where so much of the state is wetlands and drainage.

Humans suck
This post was edited on 7/10/19 at 11:28 am
Posted by Wtodd
Tampa, FL
Member since Oct 2013
67482 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:27 am to
quote:

More Flooding Caused By

Government planning/intervention....see the Everglades & Lake Okeechobee
Posted by tigeraddict
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2007
11792 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:30 am to
for a flash flood, yes, development will effect the area with respect to flooding. Flash flooding is heavy rainfall in a very short time, that usually drains away shortly after the rain subsides.

with back water flooding, not so much since back water flooding is a result of rain/water over a region.

EDIT: 2016 was not due to development. we got so much water in the region, the rivers could not handle it. this was back water floodingwhat we had in BR a number of weeks back is a flash flood event.
This post was edited on 7/10/19 at 10:32 am
Posted by ItTakesAThief
Scottsdale, Arizona
Member since Dec 2009
9187 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:33 am to
More concrete and more roads cut natural drainage. Elevating land to build roads, homes and developments sheds water onto adjacent properties that may have never had a water problem and now flood.

Yes development, drainage and changing where water stands and where water flows to is what is causing much of the problems caused by rain. It has always rained, where the water goes and how it gets there continues to evolve with development.
Posted by udtiger
Over your left shoulder
Member since Nov 2006
98454 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:33 am to
Yes
Posted by LSUDAN1
Member since Oct 2010
8949 posts
Posted on 7/10/19 at 10:34 am to
Engineers continue to say to city council members that there is a net zero effect in drainage due to development. It is all a lie. You can't continue with fill mitigation without having some negative impact to drainage of surrounding properties.
This post was edited on 7/10/19 at 10:35 am
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram