- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Is there any footage of a modern day nuclear test explosion?
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:54 am to airfernando
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:54 am to airfernando
Im aware we have more than the smaller tactical nukes, but that's the direction our arsenal has been going for a while
The Tsar Bomba was the biggest nuclear weapon ever detonated. Obviously we can create bombs now with a more powerful yield/material but we don't need bombs like the Tsar Bomb, because it's pointless levels of destruction
We don't test nukes because of treaties, and because we can model these things now. Not because the weapons are too powerful relative to the past.
The Tsar Bomba was the biggest nuclear weapon ever detonated. Obviously we can create bombs now with a more powerful yield/material but we don't need bombs like the Tsar Bomb, because it's pointless levels of destruction
We don't test nukes because of treaties, and because we can model these things now. Not because the weapons are too powerful relative to the past.
This post was edited on 2/9/18 at 11:55 am
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:59 am to Cocotheape
North Korea will have a video soon.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 11:59 am to TDsngumbo
quote:
I know what the "old" nukes looked like - I want to see what a modern day American nuclear explosion looks like.
I mean, a giant fireball in 1958 looks the same as it does in 2018.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:16 pm to Walking the Earth
What movie are those gifs from?
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:16 pm to biglego
quote:
The weapons cause too much havoc to test. Each explosion could obliterate an island.
Yep. Guam almost tipped over and sank from too many people being on it. Think of a nuke hitting an island like that. True story. Look it up.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:21 pm to Cocotheape
quote:
The Tsar Bomba was the biggest nuclear weapon ever detonated. Obviously we can create bombs now with a more powerful yield/material but we don't need bombs like the Tsar Bomb, because it's pointless levels of destruction
Yeah, I don't think there's a weapon in existence as powerful as the Tsar Bomba
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:22 pm to TigerFanatic99
quote:
What movie are those gifs from?

Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:27 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Only tinpot countries would see value in something like that, and tinpot countries don't have the resources to place all their efforts into one giant (unreliable) bomb.
This ignores the issues with delivering a bomb that size as well, vs a bunch of smaller nukes
This ignores the issues with delivering a bomb that size as well, vs a bunch of smaller nukes
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:47 pm to TigerstuckinMS
Ah thanks for the info. I assumed we had ratified that treaty after reading about it
Posted on 2/9/18 at 12:50 pm to someLSUdoosh
quote:
Nuclear Simulator website
Trinity test size airburst destroys all of NBR but leaves the airport and south of Florida St. alone.
This post was edited on 2/9/18 at 12:51 pm
Posted on 2/9/18 at 2:12 pm to Loungefly85
Does St. George have a nuclear program?
Posted on 2/9/18 at 2:33 pm to TDsngumbo
The last one we tested made Guam tip over so we had to stop.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 2:56 pm to Cocotheape
quote:
The most powerful bomb ever was tested in the 50s
The Tsar Bomba
LINK
Ironically one of the "cleanest" bombs ever dropped as there was relatively little fallout.
quote:
Tsar Bomba (Russian: ????-?????; "Tsar-bomb", or "King of bombs") was the Western nickname for the Soviet RDS-220 hydrogen bomb (code name Ivan[3] or Vanya), the most powerful nuclear weapon ever created. Its test on 30 October 1961 remains the most powerful explosive ever detonated. It was also referred to as Kuzkina mat (Russian: ???????? ????; "Kuzma's mother"),[4] possibly referring to First secretary Nikita Khrushchev's promise to show the United States a Kuzkina mat (an idiom roughly translating to "We'll show you!") at a 1960 session of United Nations General Assembly.[5][6]
quote:
The original, November 1961, AEC estimate of the yield was 55–60 megatons, but since 1992, all Russian sources have stated its yield as 51 megatons. First secretary Khrushchev warned in a filmed speech to the Supreme Soviet of the existence of a 100 megaton bomb. (Technically the design was capable of this yield.) Although simplistic fireball calculations predicted the fireball would hit the ground, the bomb's own shock wave reflected back and prevented this.[21] The fireball reached nearly as high as the altitude of the release plane and was visible at almost 1,000 km (620 mi) away from where it ascended. The mushroom cloud was about 64 km (40 mi) high (over seven times the height of Mount Everest), which meant that the cloud was above the stratosphere and well inside the mesosphere when it peaked. The cap of the mushroom cloud had a peak width of 95 km (59 mi) and its base was 40 km (25 mi) wide.[22][23]
All buildings in the village of Severny (both wooden and brick), located 55 km (34 mi) from ground zero within the Sukhoy Nos test range, were destroyed. In districts hundreds of kilometers from ground zero wooden houses were destroyed, stone ones lost their roofs, windows, doors, and radio communications were interrupted for almost one hour. One participant in the test saw a bright flash through dark goggles and felt the effects of a thermal pulse even at a distance of 270 kilometres (170 mi). The heat from the explosion could have caused third-degree burns 100 km (62 mi) away from ground zero. A shock wave was observed in the air at Dikson settlement 700 km (430 mi) away; windowpanes were partially broken to distances of 900 kilometres (560 mi).[24] Atmospheric focusing caused blast damage at even greater distances, breaking windows in Norway and Finland. Despite being detonated 4.2 km above ground, its seismic body wave magnitude was estimated at 5–5.25.[10][21] Sensors continued to identify the shockwaves after their third trip around the world.[11][25]
Posted on 2/9/18 at 3:10 pm to someLSUdoosh
quote:
Nuclear Simulator website
Ive lost hours of productivity on this website. Enjoy.
You can take out Bryant-Denny Stadium with a "Davy Crockett" bomb and most of the rest of Tuscaloosa should be fine.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 3:16 pm to TDsngumbo
This is footage of the aftermath of a nuclear explosion:
No footage of the actual explosion because all of the security cam footage was wiped leading up to the blast.

No footage of the actual explosion because all of the security cam footage was wiped leading up to the blast.
Posted on 2/9/18 at 3:22 pm to TDsngumbo
Find a video of Hillary finding out she lost the election
Posted on 2/9/18 at 3:31 pm to Cocotheape
I’m sure we have some big arse bombs stashed somewhere in the US. Pretty much every country we want to nuke could be taken out with a regular sized one though.
I don’t foresee a scenario where we need to use massive nukes unless the world is ending
I don’t foresee a scenario where we need to use massive nukes unless the world is ending
Back to top
