- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:42 pm to Gaggle
quote:
So he is at the exact perfect distance? If he took steps backward it would go down again
No he’s not at the perfect height to see the entire ship, that’s what he calculates in his reply. He doesn’t know the exact distance to the second ship, so he shows how high he would’ve had to go above sea level to see objects at various distances.
Also, if he were to move away from the second ship, it would “go down again”. You’re almost there buddy.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:42 pm to Gaggle
quote:
you would be in awe of my intellect
a true sign of a mental deficient...also, believing that you have some obscure knowledge that others are not privy to is a form of "magical thinking"...it often occurs in the mentally ill...
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:43 pm to Gaggle
quote:
If you met me you would be in awe of my intellect like everyone who meets and you would sit down and listen.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:43 pm to WinnPtiger
Why did you say woof?
Do you not realize the whole argument of the Coriolis effect posits a tangible effect of the spin of earth?
Or
Do you not realize that on a sphere an equatorial spot has to cover many more times the distance than an axial spot to complete a rotation, and thus the equator spins much faster?
Do you not realize the whole argument of the Coriolis effect posits a tangible effect of the spin of earth?
Or
Do you not realize that on a sphere an equatorial spot has to cover many more times the distance than an axial spot to complete a rotation, and thus the equator spins much faster?
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 9:45 pm
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:46 pm to Duke
I can't help what people do in real life and that you can't see it over the internet. Look at all the bad faith arguments. That is the pratfall of the medium
>Insert quote
>Insert emoticon
>Insert quote
>Insert emoticon
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 9:48 pm
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:47 pm to Gaggle
I read 34 pages of garbage and still don't have an answer. Fack this. I'm out!!
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:47 pm to threeputtforbogie
quote:The bottom of the ship is distorted, not obscured. You can see strange holes in it. The height of the ship doesn't change.
No he’s not at the perfect height to see the entire ship, that’s what he calculates in his reply.
quote:Would it though? Test it. Get there buddy.
Also, if he were to move away from the second ship, it would “go down again”.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:49 pm to northshorebamaman
yeah I’ll admit Gaggle had me going but he’s definitely just trolling
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:50 pm to pussywillows
quote:Incorrect. It is all defensive. Touting myself never began until a bevy of personal attacks against me. I have ignored many of them. The thread will show this. Personal attacks is about all you have. And you're wrong on those too. You're mentally ill, you believe a lie.
a true sign of a mental deficient...also, believing that you have some obscure knowledge that others are not privy to is a form of "magical thinking"...it often occurs in the mentally ill...
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:50 pm to Ross
I applaud everyone for keeping this going lol
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:50 pm to Gaggle
How do you define the horizon? If everything was flat, the horizon would be the edge of the disk planet?
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:51 pm to threeputtforbogie
The flat line at the end of our field of view of a vast plane. It never changes.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:57 pm to Gaggle
quote:
The flat line at the end of our field of view of a vast plane. It never changes.
I just showed you an example that it does change.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:58 pm to Gaggle
quote:
I can't help what people do in real life and that you can't see it over the internet
It was a legitimately funny thing for your trolling arse to say. Take the win and dont push it.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:59 pm to Ross
Look at all the arguments torn to pieces. Eclipses, done. Phases of Venus, done. Coriolis effect, done. Ships disappearing over the horizons, done. Seeing the curvature from up high, done. Radar limited distance, done. NASA photos, done. And we just keep coming back with more and more arguments and somehow calling me a crazy idiot. Could any of you argue these points? Obviously not, you bought them in the first place. Meanwhile I keep saying for people to look into it themselves.
Tell me who has honestly argued in better faith
Tell me who has honestly argued in better faith
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 10:01 pm
Posted on 4/11/22 at 9:59 pm to Gaggle
quote:
I'm not a little child. If you met me you would be in awe of my intellect like everyone who meets and you would sit down and listen.
quote:
The bottom of the ship is distorted, not obscured. You can see strange holes in it.
Bravo
Posted on 4/11/22 at 10:04 pm to Yeti_Chaser
quote:
YouTube has made me a believer by putting a disinformation tag on this video.
quote:Those flights are obviously cherry-picked to find layovers that align with the flat earther map. There's a reason they chose Johannesburg to Perth instead of Johannesburg to Sydney. It's because there are direct flights to Sydney which follow the expected shortest path. This is an economic issue, not evidence for a flat earth.
Got curious about flight paths and found this.
Similarly with the Santiago to Sydney flight which detours through LA. When you go the other way from Sydney to Santiago you can take a non-stop flight with a time close to the assumed direct path time.
Don't let these numbskulls fool you.
Posted on 4/11/22 at 10:07 pm to threeputtforbogie
I'm literally having to explain what you see with your own eyes. The bottom of the ship is distorted, it is a refracted image that garbles the picture. It is NOT dipped below the water, there are in fact parts where you can see "ship" as if it's floating in air and "holes" through the ship. It's a distorted image, not an obscured one.
The mast and top of the upper cabin are at the same height off the water
Look with your own damn eyes and see. From your link!
The mast and top of the upper cabin are at the same height off the water
Look with your own damn eyes and see. From your link!
This post was edited on 4/11/22 at 10:08 pm
Posted on 4/11/22 at 10:07 pm to Gaggle
quote:
There is not a real Coriolis effect in snipers. Snipers don't use it. If you're using it in shooting you're a moron.
Snipers do use it. Go to any long-range shooting forum and ask if Coriolis is important, nobody will tell you it isn't especially past 400m.
Here are screen shots of the Lapua ballistics app:
Notice how it uses your latitude and direction of fire to calculate the Coriolis offset. Any 1000m F-Class shooter that doesn't account for Coriolis either by calculation or on site siting will get laughed off the range because their groups are going to be inches off at least shooting within the US.
Page 34 of 58
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News