Started By
Message

re: Is it time to reconsider mandatory public high school education?

Posted on 8/21/23 at 10:57 am to
Posted by Park duck
Sip
Member since Oct 2018
396 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 10:57 am to
So what happens when these awesome failing students start failing trade school????
Posted by Park duck
Sip
Member since Oct 2018
396 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:00 am to
Social Studies Teacher $118,845 - $148,457 $132,806 Louisiana Department of Education

SOMEONE OWES ME A SH!T TON OF MONEY!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Posted by olgoi khorkhoi
priapism survivor
Member since May 2011
14880 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:03 am to
Get rid of the cradle to grave social safety net that takes money from the productive and subsidizes these usess eaters and force people to live with the true consequences of their choices.
Posted by TrouserTrout
Member since Nov 2017
6425 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:03 am to
Every year more and more of the better behaved and more interested students move to private schools. Teachers are also following this trend. No one wants to deal with the local rejects anymore or expose their children to them.
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11234 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:13 am to
quote:

its the same dumb people who think financial math isnt taught in school, that basic computer skills are not taught, basic health is not taught...... its such a lazy take that they scream...need more trades...when its been implemented for decades that you could go that path.

I’m not arguing that you should have the option to be at a trade or alternate school.

I’m stating flat out that if you are failing and distracting students via violence or disruptive behavior consistently you should be expelled and sent to an alternate school.

Your right to an education ends when it’s preventing others from having the ability to do so.
This post was edited on 8/21/23 at 11:47 am
Posted by CaptainBrannigan
Good Ole Rocky Top Tennessee
Member since Jan 2010
21644 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:15 am to
Sure. Send a child out into the world with zero education and no job prospects seems like a great idea.

Is this why Republicans are working to repeal child labor laws?

OT genius strikes again.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261251 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:17 am to
Yes. HS should be optional, we spend too much money on kids who do not value education.

Posted by TrouserTrout
Member since Nov 2017
6425 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:17 am to
quote:

Your right to an education ends when it’s preventing others from having the ability to do so
Then people would say that public schools are racist.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261251 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Sure. Send a child out into the world with zero education and no job prospects seems like a great idea.


The average american reads at a 7th to 8th grade level, you aren't going to improve with more education

A certain subset of people in this country do not value education, you cannot force them to learn.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
261251 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:20 am to
quote:

Then people would say that public schools are racist.


The shitty students who don't want to be there hold everyone else down.
Posted by DakIsNoLB
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
586 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:23 am to
quote:

We need to change it up and realize that not everyone needs to go to college. You pretty much know by middle school who is cut out for college or not. If not, starting in middle school they diverge down the trade path, with classes focused on financial literacy and life skills into specialized trades by high school.



That would be interesting. Heard them out of the K-12 system when you know they aren't getting it while providing an avenue to gain life skills and a vocation.

You'll have to fight the stigma of not having even a highschool diploma though.
Posted by TrouserTrout
Member since Nov 2017
6425 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:30 am to
quote:

The shitty students who don't want to be there hold everyone else down.
I agree. It’s why my kid goes to private school.
Posted by kennypowers
AR
Member since Mar 2009
510 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:33 am to
quote:

Every year more and more of the better behaved and more interested students move to private schools. Teachers are also following this trend. No one wants to deal with the local rejects anymore or expose their children to them.


We moved our kids at the start of 9th grade. Best decision we've ever made. The local public school is full of animals and many of the parents are worse.
Posted by HottyToddy7
Member since Sep 2010
14032 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:34 am to
quote:

Sure. Send a child out into the world with zero education and no job prospects seems like a great idea.

Is this why Republicans are working to repeal child labor laws?

OT genius strikes again.



What about the other kids who show up to learn everyday and gets their day interrupted by this kid who doesn't want to be there? When do people think about these kids?
Posted by Double Down
Mayor of St. George
Member since Dec 2007
6543 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:38 am to
May as well start building more prisons. That’s where the majorly of middle school dropouts are going to wind up so why not get proactive?
Posted by TubaDawg
Member since Mar 2014
165 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:38 am to
100% Past time.

Keep in mind one of the "founders" of the public education movement here in America said the following:

Horace Mann, the designer of the nation's first compulsory schooling law in Massachusetts in 1852, saw taxpayer-funded, universal compulsory schooling as a way to mold children into moral, democratic citizens. He famously said: “Men are cast-iron, but children are wax.”

Public education has NEVER been about educating kids.

Larry Sharpe who ran for NY Governor as a Libertarian has one of the more practical solutions on how to fix education in this country.

LINK

Posted by Oilfieldbiology
Member since Nov 2016
37564 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:44 am to
quote:

As a society, we need to change our focus. We need to focus on the 90 percent of kids who WANT to be in school and want to be successful. Tell the 10 percent to shape up, or they can get out. If a kid doesn't want to attend school after 8th grade and that kid is doing nothing but causing trouble, let them go.


This punishes the rest of society but not the kids parents.

If you’re kicked out of school you must be homeschooled and must come to the local school one weekend to pass a 3rd party proctored LEAP type test to prove you’ve learned enough to pass.

If this fails, both the parent and the kid have to partake in service hours over the summer. The kid 40 hours a week, the parent 16 hours a week unless unemployed. If unemployed 40 hours at the same time and place as the kid.

Failure to comply will result in criminal charges and detention in work programs overseen by police.

You have to punish parents for not raising their kids but rather wanting schools and the government to do it.

These aren’t the government’s kids, these are not the school’s kids. These are the parent’s kids.
Posted by QJenk
Atl, Ga
Member since Jan 2013
15356 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:45 am to
quote:

But these kids don't want that either. They don't want to be there. And due to state and federal law, they have to be.


I hear you. But if these kids weren't in school. Where would they go. Their parent(s) are at work. The teens will be home alone with endless free time. There is a guarantee they will get into trouble.

I know as it right now, many of these teens are already getting into trouble. But without mandatory schooling, I would wager you can double or even triple that number.

I hate it, but many high schools are nothing but a glorified day care. The system is broken, I admit. But what is the solution, however?
Posted by LSUFanHouston
NOLA
Member since Jul 2009
37140 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:48 am to
quote:

As with all things, getting the gov't out of the public education business would be step one. Parents should handle this themselves without the intrusion of the state.


So, all private schools?

Considering most of these kids come from backgrounds where the parent would not be able to afford an education, how would that work?
Posted by tide06
Member since Oct 2011
11234 posts
Posted on 8/21/23 at 11:48 am to
quote:

Then people would say that public schools are racist.

That accusation doesn't mean much to me as long as the same standards for behavior, performance and attitude are being applied to all children, regardless of color, race, sex or otherwise.

I think it might take suing people for liable to make the race baiters stop wielding that word like a weapon to win arguments.
This post was edited on 8/21/23 at 11:50 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 5Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram