- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 5/29/18 at 4:59 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:Conservation easements are great. You give a qualified organization an easement whereby your property is protected from development, logging, etc. You can still allow hunting but you don't have to allow public access (and most landowners aren't going to allow public access). We have family conservation properties, and most have conservation easements.
WTF?
My uncle and I are looking for a conservation property to buy right now. It will have a conservation easement established on it shortly after we acquire it.
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:00 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
This fetishization of "wilderness" is one of my biggest pet peeves around.
In what way?
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:01 pm to yoga girl
quote:
My uncle and I are looking for a conservation property to buy right now. It will have a conservation easement established on it shortly after we acquire it.
And the best part is, at the end, you log it bare, plant pine, and get another easement.
It's a federally subsidized tree plantation.
This post was edited on 5/29/18 at 5:02 pm
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:05 pm to yoga girl
quote:
THis is more important than Chem-trails.
That and chemtrails don't fricking exist.
You're welcome, everyone!
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:05 pm to X123F45
quote:
And the best part is, at the end, you log it bare, plant pine, and get another easement.
It's a federally subsidized tree plantation.
I'm not against timber management to mitigate fire dangers or to maintain forest health. But, if it is my place, it will not be a timber property.
We have guests who come out to our family properties. I've been surprised at how indifferent some are (maybe it is ignorance). In my experience, hunters and people who fish are the most considerate.
ETA: I laughed at your earlier comment.
This post was edited on 5/29/18 at 5:07 pm
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:08 pm to yoga girl
So what's the real question?
Nevermind, I see the real question:
My uncle and I are looking for a conservation property to buy right now. It will have a conservation easement established on it shortly after we acquire it.
Nevermind, I see the real question:
My uncle and I are looking for a conservation property to buy right now. It will have a conservation easement established on it shortly after we acquire it.
This post was edited on 5/29/18 at 5:11 pm
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:12 pm to yoga girl
You want to buy land and use easements to your advantage.
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:13 pm to yoga girl
Sounds like Waldo fricked it up for everyone. Why did he sell out to the man?
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:16 pm to Count Chocula
quote:
You want to buy land and use easements to your advantage.
There are tax advantages. But, that is not why you do it. I want (my uncle has somewhat different requirements) a property with "topography" (canyons, mountains, etc.), trees, live water with fish, large places around it with conservation easements (so you don't have some development pop up nearby).
The conservation easement protects your property and that of your neighbors.
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:18 pm to Barstools
quote:
Sounds like Waldo fricked it up for everyone. Why did he sell out to the man?
He said that he could not divide up his property fairly among his kids. I have wondered why he did not set up some kind of trust.
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:20 pm to yoga girl
Don't ever plan to develop it then. Never, ever buy land the govt considers wetlands. You cant even do things to protect it from erosion without their approval.
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:21 pm to yoga girl
quote:
I want (my uncle has somewhat different requirements) a property with "topography" (canyons, mountains, etc.), trees, live water with fish, large places around it with conservation easements (so you don't have some development pop up nearby).
Are resident Bigfoots a problem?
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:23 pm to Y.A. Tittle
quote:
This fetishization of "wilderness" is one of my biggest pet peeves around.
In what way? I love wilderness but let's not start limiting access
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:27 pm to Count Chocula
quote:
Don't ever plan to develop it then. Never, ever buy land the govt considers wetlands. You cant even do things to protect it from erosion without their approval.
Our family land is far from the wetlands area (I think).
Posted on 5/29/18 at 5:29 pm to yoga girl
Wetlands are not just along the coast. Some are far inland, but chances are you're safe.
Posted on 5/29/18 at 6:09 pm to yoga girl
This is why private ownership beats government ownership every time.
You're on your way to being red pilled
You're on your way to being red pilled
Posted on 5/29/18 at 6:16 pm to deltaland
quote:I think risperdal is more of a peach color.
You're on your way to being red pilled
Posted on 5/29/18 at 6:38 pm to yoga girl
quote:
For example, places like the Amazon don't need to become tourist traps. We destroy everthing we enter, as a general rule.
Fortunately the Amazon basin is still so huge that tourism makes almost no impact on it. But yeah, HUGE tracts need to be off limits. There will still be plenty for tourists.
I've been able to visit some really great places that are still pristine. And I always think of a quote by David Foster Wallace. These trips weren't "mass tourism" but he wasn't wrong, to be honest.
“To be a mass tourist, for me, is to become a pure late-date American: alien, ignorant, greedy for something you cannot ever have, disappointed in a way you can never admit. It is to spoil, by way of sheer ontology, the very unspoiledness you are there to experience, It is to impose yourself on places that in all non-economic ways would be better, realer, without you. It is, in lines and gridlock and transaction after transaction, to confront a dimension of yourself that is as inescapable as it is painful: As a tourist, you become economically significant but existentially loathsome, an insect on a dead thing.”
Popular
Back to top


0





