- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: If you believe in global warming/climate change, you've been duped.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 3:40 pm to bbvdd
Posted on 2/13/17 at 3:40 pm to bbvdd
Doesn't matter.
Taking care of the environment and striving for efficiency is a virtue in its own right.
As long as taxes and shite don't go full retard, of course.
As something of an environmentalist, I hate the distraction climate change has been, right or wrong, from the real challenges (mostly in the third world).
Taking care of the environment and striving for efficiency is a virtue in its own right.
As long as taxes and shite don't go full retard, of course.
As something of an environmentalist, I hate the distraction climate change has been, right or wrong, from the real challenges (mostly in the third world).
1
Posted on 2/13/17 at 3:57 pm to LSUfan20005
quote:
Taking care of the environment and striving for efficiency is a virtue in its own right.
As long as taxes and shite don't go full retard, of course
There is a sweet spot between environmental regulations/taxes and development.. trick is finding it
IMO if both sides are pissed at the regulatory agency they are probably pretty close to the mark. Environmentalists are upset, builders are upset.. we all win
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 4:02 pm
Posted on 2/13/17 at 4:04 pm to bmy
quote:
You realize that this has been thoroughly refuted, right?
I've been looking and I can not find anywhere that this has been refuted. Please link.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 4:06 pm to bbvdd
Dude people linked the actual guy your article cited saying your article was bull shite
As well as other links for unaffiliated with noaa scientists saying it's real
You just ignore anything that doesn't fit the narrative you want.
Hence he "link" reply constantly. You are incapable of thinking for yourself. Sand ignore the man himself saying your linked article is bullshite. Stay small you fricking cuck
As well as other links for unaffiliated with noaa scientists saying it's real
You just ignore anything that doesn't fit the narrative you want.
Hence he "link" reply constantly. You are incapable of thinking for yourself. Sand ignore the man himself saying your linked article is bullshite. Stay small you fricking cuck
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 4:08 pm
Posted on 2/13/17 at 4:20 pm to Mir
As someone with little to no knowledge on this topic, how much longer can the United States afford to be Oil dependent? There can't be that much left if you think in terms of generations and not just your own lifetime.
Anybody have info?
Anybody have info?
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 4:22 pm
Posted on 2/13/17 at 4:27 pm to Minden tiger
Posted on 2/13/17 at 4:37 pm to AlonsoWDC
I always love how millennials love their infographics.
doesnt even matter if it's accurate....as long as it;s on FB, and an infographic, it;s REAL!
doesnt even matter if it's accurate....as long as it;s on FB, and an infographic, it;s REAL!
Posted on 2/13/17 at 4:41 pm to bbvdd
quote:
The 'whistle blower' is John Bates who was not involved in any aspect of the work. NOAA's process is very stove-piped such that beyond seminars there is little dissemination of information across groups. John Bates never participated in any of the numerous technical meetings on the land or marine data I have participated in at NOAA NCEI either in person or remotely. This shows in his reputed (I am taking the journalist at their word that these are directly attributable quotes) mis-representation of the processes that actually occured. In some cases these mis-representations are publically verifiable.
Additional sources:
LINK
LINK
LINK
TL;DR: Former NOAA Scientist makes unsubstantiated claims regarding work that he did not participate in and which has been independently verified.
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 4:42 pm
Posted on 2/13/17 at 5:11 pm to Fatty Magoo
Actually he said that the work was rushed and should have been properly vetted which as far as I can tell still hasn't been done.
And 1 month after the (ill say incomplete) paper was released is when Obama announced his huge reform.
And 1 month after the (ill say incomplete) paper was released is when Obama announced his huge reform.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 5:14 pm to bbvdd
NASA scientists who are undeniably the best in the world isn't properly vetted?
They were linked saying this is a load of shite
You refuse to believe anything that doesn't fit your preconceived narrative. What a sad puppet cuck
They were linked saying this is a load of shite
You refuse to believe anything that doesn't fit your preconceived narrative. What a sad puppet cuck
Posted on 2/13/17 at 5:39 pm to AlonsoWDC
May I see the 100,000 Years before that, please?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 5:45 pm to GusMcRae
Yes it's pretty accurately measured in geology.
Feel free to take it upon yourself to actually learn something and improve yourself
Feel free to take it upon yourself to actually learn something and improve yourself
Posted on 2/13/17 at 5:59 pm to Mir
Except for the Absurd extrapolation....
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:17 pm to tankyank13
Who do you think make up a powerful portion of this group? fricking oil men and bankers that are invested in them. You think they give a frick what happens to our planet. Green energy is threat to their bottom line and they will do anything to protect it
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:19 pm to crazyLSUstudent
quote:
Green energy is threat to their bottom line and they will do anything to protect it
the biggest investors in green energy are the oil conglomerates...
always good to hear from yet another uninformed moron in this thread.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:27 pm to CptBengal
Like? Rockefeller is pulling out besides that who else?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:30 pm to crazyLSUstudent
quote:
Like?
like all of them
LINK
quote:
Rockefeller is pulling out
would that be Exxon-Mobile or Chevron? Considering both were spanwed based on the anti-trust of Standard Oil?
and actually, those 2 are investing the least
fat, dumb, and stupid is no way to go through life...
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:34 pm to Upperdecker
this board filled with genuises??
Posted on 2/13/17 at 7:35 pm to CptBengal
Page 10 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News