- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 2/13/17 at 9:11 pm to Mir
quote:
Can't wait for LSU to skull frick Bama this year y'all
Posted on 2/13/17 at 9:17 pm to TheIndulger
quote:
What's going on in someone's head that causes them to sit on the OT lounge all day and insult people
It's crazy. That gthog61 or whatever is the same way. I don't know why people think they're making a point by insulting everyone they disagree with. I blame poor upbringing.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 9:18 pm to northshorebamaman
LSU gonna whoop Bama arse for the next 100 years
Posted on 2/13/17 at 9:19 pm to Mir
quote:
LSU gonna whoop Bama arse for the next 100 years
Sounds legit.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 9:43 pm to northshorebamaman
quote:
It's crazy. That gthog61 or whatever is the same way. I don't know why people think they're making a point by insulting everyone they disagree with. I blame poor upbringing.
Bet you anything he wouldn't have the balls to do it in person, but feels nice n' safe hurling insults behind his computer screen.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 9:44 pm to TheIndulger
quote:
Bet you anything he wouldn't have the balls to do it in person, but feels nice n' safe hurling insults behind his computer screen.
love the internet toughguy too....are you of the Peej school of meeting at Sonic?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 9:58 pm to CptBengal
LSU gonna win a natty this year. Book it
Posted on 2/13/17 at 9:58 pm to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
Large cities are not sustainable. They suck up resources from elsewhere and are awful for the environment. No one can argue otherwise.
100% false
Cities reduce the amount of resources used by many fold
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:03 pm to WaWaWeeWa
You know which city is going to have a natty next year? Baton Rouge GEAUX TIGERS
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:04 pm to bbvdd
Errrmagawd global werming
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:05 pm to CptBengal
quote:
In terms of resources use and acquisition, cities require an extended network to deliver said resources to a location. they require extra construction, lighting, etc. The footprint in a city is actually more than a rural environment...AND you have a diminishing or loss of ecosystem services. even per capita. The aggregate is even worse.
Wrong
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:08 pm to bbvdd
While I will not argue with anyone that says we have 0% affect on global warming, IMHO it is unable to be quantified bc the poles will change regardless and we do not have enough documentation of how often the climate has changed over the billions of years this rock has been around.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:10 pm to SamuelClemens
You know what you can count on? An LSU natty this season
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:14 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
Wrong
quality reply. much info, hard argument.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:15 pm to WaWaWeeWa
quote:
100% false
Cities reduce the amount of resources used by many fold
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:16 pm to CptBengal
They do on a per capita basis, not on a per-acre basis, which is the entire point of cities.
This post was edited on 2/13/17 at 10:17 pm
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:18 pm to kingbob
quote:
They do on a per capita basis, not on a per-acre basis, which is the entire point of cities.
they only do on a per capita basis if you only address the per capita expenditure and not the shared effect of supply for certain services...and it gets even worse when you add in ecosystem services mitigation on the backend.
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:19 pm to CptBengal
Does the city happen to Baton Rouge home of LSU home of the 2017 season national champs?
Posted on 2/13/17 at 10:22 pm to CptBengal
quote:
EIA's Residential Consumption Surveys [1] - 85.3 million BTU per household per year urban vs 95 million BTU per household per year
quote:
Eia.gov
It is common knowledge that city dwellers use less resources. That's what the topic is... climate change from burning fossil fuels. Urban areas might produce more aggregate CO2, but per capita is less. Don't try to change the subject to density of water pollution, etc.
Keep laughing a-hole
Page 12 of 14
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News