- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I was a member of the jury on the Garrett Ward trial. AMA.
Posted on 6/27/22 at 11:55 pm to RazorBroncs
Posted on 6/27/22 at 11:55 pm to RazorBroncs
quote:
You actually picked one of the more reasonable and thought-provoking posts in this thread to inject your racist and classist world view into Keep viewing the world through that lens of yours, while claiming everyone else is the problem
This post is hilarious. You think there’s a reasonable doubt because the defendant claimed he was scared, in direct contradiction of literally every other piece of testimony.
Why do you think that is?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:00 am to Reluctantjuror
Grateful that one guy at least wasn’t going to let him get charged with murder.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:00 am to RazorBroncs
quote:Sure self-defense exists, but what if we just let everyone off for murder or manslaughter as long as they claim self-defense? If you inflict serious damage on someone, with zero doubt to that fact, the burden shifts to you to offer at least something which supports your self-defense claim. It didn't happen in Ward's home, in which case self-defense would be a no-brainer. Ward wasn't beat up, and didn't request treatment for a claimed knife wound. When you beat someone that bad, you should absolutely demand to be treated for injuries even if you don't have any. Say your head hurts, say your kidneys hurt, say fricking something hurts to justify beating someone within an inch of their life in public.
Self defense does exist. Not all deaths caused by another person have to fall into two categories - murder or manslaughter.
quote:The only thing supporting the claim of self-defense is the defendant's claim of self-defense. No injuries, no treatment, nothing to indicate that the deceased even put up a fight much less that he was the aggressor.
It just so happens that murder and manslaughter have a very high bar to meet for undisputed proof, it should be beyond all reasonable doubt. This incredibly high standard protects us all against unfair trials and judgements, and it sounds like the state didn't meet that standard here.
If all it took was a claim of self-defense to cast reasonable doubt, we would never convict anyone of murder, ever.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:05 am to 225Tyga
quote:
Grateful that one guy at least wasn’t going to let him get charged with murder.
We’ll just never convict anyone of murder ever again.
The, “I was scared,” defense is fricking teflon!
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:08 am to Reluctantjuror
How many people on the jury were MAGA if you had to guess?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:09 am to RazorBroncs
quote:
but it doesn't sound like the state proved its case without a shred of doubt (like the legal standard says)
Shred of evidence is not the burden of proof in a criminal trial in any jurisdiction in the United States. The burden of proof is "beyond a reasonable doubt" which in all honestly is a nebulous concept but each jury in each trial has to come to some understanding of this.
You have mentioned that this seems to be a slam dunk to be overturned on appeal. I get the feeling you think the court will overturn the finding of the jury. It is extraordinarily rare for the decision of the finder of fact (in this case a jury) to be overturned on appeal in a criminal case. Appeals courts outside of jury tampering and the like almost never "retry the facts". Successful appeals are almost always a result of the appeals court finding the trial judge erred vs the jury erred. The appeals court doesn't see nor hear the testimony both parts are a significant part of determining the veracity of the evidence. When a trial doesn't go my client's way my last concern is the jury verdict itself. The real meat is the trial judge's interpretation and application of the law.
At a point where the main reason for appeal is that the jury erred in their finding of fact you have basically lost.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:13 am to Korkstand
quote:
Ward wasn't beat up, and didn't request treatment for a claimed knife wound. When you beat someone that bad, you should absolutely demand to be treated for injuries even if you don't have any. Say your head hurts, say your kidneys hurt, say fricking something hurts to justify beating someone within an inch of their life in public.
I agree, but this case is weird because of the “blackout drunk” angle (at least to me)
Not saying it’s truly a defense, but being that intoxicated makes you irrational in a lot of ways. If the homeless guy was tapping him to check on him or was pickpocketing him it explains the extreme over reaction and violence, lack of care and continued aggression once “threat” (if homeless guy was) was neutralized
But it’s also why I keep asking what the timeline was between the fight and the police/EMS. If it was a few hours or less he would still be pretty messed up at that time, and a lot of the details of the altercation would be blurry and unreliable from Wards point of view too. So talking to cops/getting treatment etc he would t have exactly had a clear head.
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 12:15 am
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:14 am to HubbaBubba
quote:
Can you tell me why the Hubble space telescope can see a freckle on a frog's arse from 5 billion light years away, but can't take a photo of the Apollo 11 landing site on the Moon?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:25 am to WDE24
Bottom line is this- no evidence for either story. It turned into a fight for some reason. Self defense took place. No matter that age of each, both are capable of killing one another. 30 years is absolutely insane for a fight without weapons where one dies from injuries when ppl are murdering and getting less! Horrible
And think of it this way- if Ward was passed out in the bushes and woke up to some stranger over him whatever he may have been doing, your first reaction is flight or flight. Your brain isn’t caught up to what is actually happening so you panic. He was prob freaked out and fought out of fear. And to top it all off, he was prosecuted by someone that should be in jail himself
And think of it this way- if Ward was passed out in the bushes and woke up to some stranger over him whatever he may have been doing, your first reaction is flight or flight. Your brain isn’t caught up to what is actually happening so you panic. He was prob freaked out and fought out of fear. And to top it all off, he was prosecuted by someone that should be in jail himself
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 12:38 am
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:41 am to Reluctantjuror
So in your opinion, was this just an impulsive attack done for virtually no reason ? Drunkenness? Sociopathic tendencies? Time bomb waiting to explode ?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 12:53 am to Reluctantjuror
Did you wear any Perlis clothing at any point during the trial?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 1:09 am to Xcalibur2017
quote:You mean besides the dead guy and the other guy who didn't deny killing him?
Bottom line is this- no evidence for either story.
quote:I mean I'm sure the dead guy tried to defend himself..
It turned into a fight for some reason. Self defense took place.
A fight where one person ends up dead is pretty much the definition of manslaughter. Especially when the other guy evidently didn't even need a bandage or a bag of ice.
quote:Ok, I thought of it that way and turns out it's still cut and dry manslaughter. Being drunk is never a defense, and in the time from being woken up, getting up, knocking the guy to the ground, and then beating him until someone had to force him to stop, that is well enough time for the "average person" to regain his self-control, which I believe is an argument to elevate it to murder 2 per Louisiana law.
And think of it this way- if Ward was passed out in the bushes and woke up to some stranger over him whatever he may have been doing, your first reaction is flight or flight. Your brain isn’t caught up to what is actually happening so you panic. He was prob freaked out and fought out of fear.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 1:26 am to Reluctantjuror
quote:
We thought everyone lied to some extent except the couple who saw Jackson walking down the street and subsequently saw ward beating on him.
What is the race of the witnesses and the jury?
Posted on 6/28/22 at 2:09 am to TigerNlc
Were any photos of Garrett Ward’s girlfriend at the time of the incident presented?
If so, on a scale of 1 - 10, how would you rate her?
Did the jury also know that she is now dating one of Garrett’s friends?
If so, on a scale of 1 - 10, how would you rate her?
Did the jury also know that she is now dating one of Garrett’s friends?
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 2:24 am
Posted on 6/28/22 at 3:49 am to Xcalibur2017
quote:
Bottom line is this- no evidence for either story. It turned into a fight for some reason. Self defense took place. No matter that age of each, both are capable of killing one another. 30 years is absolutely insane for a fight without weapons where one dies from injuries when ppl are murdering and getting less! Horrible And think of it this way- if Ward was passed out in the bushes and woke up to some stranger over him whatever he may have been doing, your first reaction is flight or flight. Your brain isn’t caught up to what is actually happening so you panic. He was prob freaked out and fought out of fear. And to top it all off, he was prosecuted by someone that should be in jail himself
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:36 am to Eighteen
I believe it was less than 10 minutes from when the woman called 911 while following ward to the garage before the cops and ems showed up.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:39 am to Lsupimp
Felt like he overreacted due to being drunk, being entitled, and not hanging out in urban environments like Nola very much. Also felt like he had anger issues since he was very possessive of her (would randomly check her texts) and hit her at hot tin right before he went downstairs to cool off or whatever he was doing.
They at the end did the whole “I’m not racist I have black friends” defense by showing us pictures with him and people of color.
They at the end did the whole “I’m not racist I have black friends” defense by showing us pictures with him and people of color.
This post was edited on 6/28/22 at 5:45 am
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:42 am to TigerNlc
The witnesses were a pretty mixed since they brought up his girlfriend and her conworkers who were all white. Jury was 11 black 1 Asian 2 white including the alternates.
Posted on 6/28/22 at 5:43 am to UncleLester
There was a picture from their dinner party and she testified. We weren’t told anything what she was up to after they broke up.
Popular
Back to top



0









