- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
I have an AI question
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:34 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:34 pm
I admit I don’t know much about how well AI works. That being cleared up, my question is this, could AI be given all the evidence and be able to “look” at the Magruder films and come to a conclusion as to if there were more than one shooter? May be a dumb question but I’ve never been accused of being the brightest bulb in the house.
13
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:35 pm to yakster
Look at AI as a more advanced search engine.
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 9:36 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:35 pm to yakster
AI could analyze the films and point out details that support or contradict theories, but it cannot definitively answer “was there more than one shooter?” on its own.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:36 pm to yakster
Ask AI
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:36 pm to yakster
You could design an AI to come to either conclusion. The AI will almost always show some bias.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:36 pm to yakster
You would have to train the model on all the data that is out there and it would just spit out the summary of the highest likelihood answer according to the prompt and the underlying data on and around the film.
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 9:52 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:36 pm to yakster
quote:
Magruder films
Are you talking about the Zapruder films?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:41 pm to yakster
It would 100% give a definitive answer based on what it thinks is true. Problem is, it won’t be definitive or accepted.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:42 pm to fightin tigers
So is it only as intelligent as what’s put into it by human interface?
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:42 pm to Prosecuted Collins
quote:
You would gave to train the model on all the data that is out there and it would just spit out the summary of the highest likelihood answer according to the prompt and the underlying data on and around the film.
This is what a lot of people don’t understand about AI. It can only “know” why it’s told. It’s the epitome of “garbage in/garbage out.” A perfect example of this is how, until recently when people started speaking out about it, if you were to ask some of the main AI platforms to create an image of our Founding Fathers, over half of the people in the AI generated image were black women.
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:45 pm to yakster
quote:
Magruder films
(Close enough)
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:50 pm to yakster
quote:
So is it only as intelligent as what’s put into it by human interface?
In a way. It doesn't know if it is right or wrong so it is just processing and accessing what is fed in.
It can't actually build new knowledge.
You can teach it everything about baking bread and let it teach people to bake bread for 20 years. Then ask it to bake muffins and it will have no clue what you mean.
What is really funny is most AI cannot learn from human interactions. As in Chatgpt will give you the same wrong answer every time even though you previously said that answer was wrong.
This post was edited on 12/14/25 at 9:53 pm
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:51 pm to fightin tigers
So basically it’s nothing more than an answering machine lol.
Posted on 12/14/25 at 9:53 pm to yakster
Depending on the AI. Reasoning and answering.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 7:26 am to yakster
I think where AI is helpful is situations where there is a shite ton of data. It's good at seeing patterns in those cases. I've read that it's good at spotting cancer in medical scans. I'm assuming that's because it was trained on millions of scans, shown what to look for, and can now pick up on subtle clues that humans might miss.
Posted on 12/15/25 at 7:29 am to yakster
quote:
Magruder films
Don't you mean Zapruder film?
Posted on 12/15/25 at 10:35 am to yakster
I've found Google's Gemini and Microsoft's Copilot very useful for web search summaries. For generating graphics both can be pretty bad. I asked Gemini to draw 12 circles maximally packaged without any overlap. On the 1st try the figure had 14 circles. The next try had 17...then 19. On that last try all the circles overlapped! I prompted Gemini to explain the failure. After a lengthy exchange filled with utter BS it replied that it's graphic nano banana" could not count"!!!
You have to figure that some AI developers are not the sharpest tools
You have to figure that some AI developers are not the sharpest tools
Posted on 12/15/25 at 11:21 am to yakster
Why don’t you ask AI?
Page 1 of 1
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News