- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: I-10 bridge replacement project in Lake Charles may get federal funding under Trump's plan
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:53 pm to member12
Posted on 2/14/18 at 12:53 pm to member12
quote:
Baton Rouge hasn't really found consensus on the general placement of their new bridge until recently - and it is still only narrowed down to two spots.
the Capitol region cant agree on shite, apparently. Whether its a new bridge or a loop, this area is more dysfunctional than a Kardashian family reunion.
Hell, even if the local politicians all got paid off like they want, the state never puts the money aside for matching funds. Unless we are given the billions to build a bridge or a loop, I don't think it will ever happen.
But hay man, BR could be the next Austin.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:41 pm to La Squared
quote:The issue is due to a pipeline that was leaking some bad stuff into the soils around the river. If you start driving pilings through it, it will push that chemical down closer to the local water table. The state is doing a study to try to identify those risks, and should have a report out sometime this year, hopefully.
I’ve always heard it will be an environmental nightmare if they ever try to do it.
Once that is known, the bridge designs will be more conceivable.
quote:It's not, and guy who made those claims is long gone.
I also don’t feel the condition is as bad as the 3 year old radio station Facebook post that gets floated around from time to time.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:45 pm to thejudge
quote:I don't know about that. The steel spans were designed for a 40-year lifetime, and it's simply time to replace them. At least that's my understanding.
Word was here the spans on 210 were found to be made out of the incorrect material spec and have got to be replaced.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:48 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:Partially true, there is a business that still brings big boats up past the I-10 bridge. But, the Port of Lake Charles also owns property up there that could be developed, as well as other riverfront property (which is in high demand, particularly right now with all the construction) that it would be silly to cut it all off with too low of a span. So, a reasonable height is needed, albeit not nearly the height of the current bridge.
there is one company with a dock or something past the bridge that may use boats that require a higher bridge design. this business is minority-owned and it's become a racial thing
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:50 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:It's hilarious how steep that bridge is because it was designed for rare motor vehicle traffic.
it has a bad rating b/c of how high it is and the angle of ascent/descent.
The slope on that bridge is around 3.5%, while most grades today are 2% or less. It's a steep mofo for a long ways up.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:53 pm to CarRamrod
quote:I'll tell you this, it's an I-10 bridge, and if the state can't provide matching funds to replace it, there's planning underway about leaving the current bridge in place, and building a new bridge paid for by tolls and a public-private partnership right beside it. If you want to cross the existing I-10 bridge, you'll be welcome to do so. Or pay a toll, and cross the safer, lower-span bridge.
did you even read the article? the I-10 bridge in Lake Chuck isnt a Lake Chuck bridge. It is an I-10 bridge that connects the East to the West. Being it is deficient it is much bigger than a 3rd BR bridge.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 9:56 pm to VernonPLSUfan
quote:Correct. The same height on a new bridge is not needed.
According to the responses is that when it was built back in the 60s/70s there was boat traffic going underneath. Not so much now.
quote:A bad chemical that doesn't react well with humans drinking it. A leaky pipeline put a bunch of it in the river and around its banks. If you drive deep pilings through it, you will be giving a path to the local water table.
What is EDC?
Posted on 2/14/18 at 10:25 pm to LSUgusto
Wow I didn't realize it is one of the top 7 bridges in the US needing replacement.
Posted on 2/14/18 at 10:32 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
Because the river passes through areas intensive in petroleum refining and other industries, petrochemical wastes have been found contaminating the river and estuarine environment along the lower Calcasieu River. A 1993 Condea Vista Chemical Company pipeline spill was reported by the company to have leaked 1.6 million pounds of a highly toxic chemical known as ethylene dichloride. Mother Jones reported the spill as potentially discharging between 19 and 47 million pounds that would have spread throughout parts of the estuary. Sasol Ltd purchased Condea Vista in 2000[3] inheriting the controversy. The site was designated a "super-fund site" and Sasol has been involved in long term legal battles that have resulted in settlements, fines, and clean up of affected areas. A problem is that the chemical sinks in water and gets covered by deposits of silt. Cleanup would inherently disturb the covered chemical stirring it up causing further ecological damage. The lower end of the estimated spill (19 million tons) would be two times the 1988 US production of ethylene dichloride that was 9,445,000 tons. 1.6 million tons were cleaned up.[4] Any construction might disturb contaminated soil so would have to be constantly monitored.[5]
Posted on 2/15/18 at 1:32 am to VernonPLSUfan
quote:
Why is the bridge so fricking high?
When it was built, they expected ship traffic that never happened.
I cross the bridge almost daily to bring my daughter to school in Lake Charles. The scare tactics they use with these stories are ridiculous.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 2:31 am to VernonPLSUfan
quote:
There was a thread about the LC I-10 bridge a few years back. I asked the same question. Why is the bridge so fricking high? According to the responses is that when it was built back in the 60s/70s there was boat traffic going underneath. Not so much now. What is EDC?
The I-10 LC bridge was built in 1952.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:14 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
3. they have to build a bridge while leaving this one open, and 210 is already about to undergo years of work. the logistics are just a nightmare. it's not feasible to not have this bridge open, though, due to the plants right on the other side of the water
I live off of 210 and use the bridge every day, that commute is gonna be awesome.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 4:21 am to member12
quote:
Lake Charles
Stopped reading.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 5:40 am to Houma Sapien
...says the guy from Houma
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:02 am to Prominentwon
quote:
Why is the bridge so fricking high?
I’ve also heard the military wanted it that high for navy ships etc for safe harboring during time of war.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 6:15 am to member12
Lake Charles, now that's a shithole.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 7:19 am to Walt OReilly
A few years ago, we hung scaffolds under bridge for extensive repairs. There were entire I beam connections rusted away, no contact! Im no engineer, but... I was shocked at the level of decay.
A major hindrance is the EDC contamination of marsh on west side of bridge. 10-15 years ago, it was discovered that a Vista EDC pipeline has been spilling EDC in that area. The leak had gone unnoticed for a while, authorities weren't sure of quantity spilled. Once any digging or disturbance of the contaminated soil/mud begins, the entire Calcasieu estuary could be affected.
Ohhhhhhh.... I see that Im wayyyyy late! lol My bad.
A major hindrance is the EDC contamination of marsh on west side of bridge. 10-15 years ago, it was discovered that a Vista EDC pipeline has been spilling EDC in that area. The leak had gone unnoticed for a while, authorities weren't sure of quantity spilled. Once any digging or disturbance of the contaminated soil/mud begins, the entire Calcasieu estuary could be affected.
Ohhhhhhh.... I see that Im wayyyyy late! lol My bad.
This post was edited on 2/15/18 at 7:31 am
Posted on 2/15/18 at 7:51 am to LSUgusto
quote:
The slope on that bridge is around 3.5%
Actually, it is 5% at its steepest part, the approach spans.
Posted on 2/15/18 at 8:42 am to Statestreet
quote:
I’ve also heard the military wanted it that high for navy ships etc for safe harboring during time of war.
That particular bridge was built before I-10. It was never designed to be part of the interstate system. It actually had a walking path over it at one time.
Popular
Back to top


0





