re: How would you handle the arrest of this woman?

quote:

---

Well you dont need a thumbs up or down from a victim for an arrest to be made.

---

Goal posts just moved. We just went from filing charges and pursuing a case to making an arrest. I'm certain the police could arrest her, charge her with tempted burglary, based entirely on the witnesses. but it's the boyfriend elected to not file charges, of course the DEA is not going to pursue that.

Really we haven't even gotten down to whether a crime was even committed, outside of the resisting. In fact she may not have broken into her ex-boyfriend's car.

Bottom line is, had she just answered his questions and been cooperative none of this would have happened.

BUT SHE DID NOT.

quote:

---

Bottom line is, had she just answered his questions and been cooperative none of this would have happened. BUT SHE DID NOT

---

The Constitution says she does not have to answer his questions.

Bad reporting does not tell us if the truck was damaged in any way.

quote:

---

Bottom line is, had she just answered his questions and been cooperative none of this would have happened.

---

She was being arrested by Barney whether she cooperated or not.

Due to a neighbor claiming someone was trying to break into a car.

I didn't notice how he identified her as the 'suspect' either, other than sitting outside an apartment.

An attorney will eviscerate this clown in court if a nice big settlement isn't agreed to beforehand.

I mentioned in a couple posts back the special circumstances that would cause the DA to elect to not honor a request to drop charges in this case. That would be a mistake the elected DA is not going to make. In the very outside chance they were to do that, they would first file that charge in court first establishing that they do believe there was a valid case to bring, THEN dismiss the casenoer victim request. No burglary charge was ever filed according to the info Ive read.

And Im not clear on the moving goalposts thing....I gave a rendition of how the process works everywhere.

I read the ridiculous responses in this thread and then watched the video expecting to see a practical murder with blood everywhere. What a joke. I have bled more than that during a touch football game and we didn’t even stop play. America really is becoming a bunch of pussies. Give that chick a wad of gauze and an ice pack and book her into jail. The officers actions were far FAR from unreasonable when dealing with a drunk.

As far as the legality of it, the officer 100% has the legal right to perform an Investigatory Detention with Reasonable Suspicion of the occurrence of a crime. Whether the crime occurred or was eventually charged is immaterial after the fact. He was reasonably detaining her to investigate and can use reasonable force to keep her detained during that time period. His actions were by the book. The fact that she got a little owie and lost a couple of ounces of blood doesn’t mean she is getting some giant payout.

She was being uncooperative, he literally days "Want me to arrest you, how about attempted vehicle burglary?" Another few seconds of more of the exact same type of uncooperativeness, then he says Im about to grab you and out cuffs on. Before any walking off. Before any pulling away. He placed her under arrest for attempted vehicle burglary. He said it himself. And he did it because he was pissy about her attitude.

Nick is probably glad as to support his position in the future of being a crazy bitch and unfit mother. I am sure a Judge in a custody case would frown on her conduct, especially if there were further instances of her drunken shite!

quote:

---

What crime did she commit?

---

being white in 2019

and how !!!