Started By
Message

re: How real is a water scarcity threat, re: Building Data Centers?

Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:18 pm to
Posted by rented mule
Member since Sep 2005
2780 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

Why? The data center is going up no matter what. Neither Meta nor the local government officials that are bound by NDA give a shite what the people want.


Because, with all the negative attention they are getting, you would imagine that they would want to tout their positives as loudly as possible, both to pat themselves on the back for their environmental kudos and to garner public favoritism for future projects.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30089 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:18 pm to
quote:

This is the new liberal fight


I’m conservative and think this shite needs to be reigned in and looked at more closely.
Posted by justaniceguy
Member since Sep 2020
7550 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:19 pm to
For once the liberals are doing something good
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72063 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:40 pm to
This really highlights the need for a new centralist political party.

The bulk of the reasonable and intelligent people in this country cannot align with either side anymore.

You can't be both a capitalist and an environmentalist anymore. For people who are largely single-issue voters it doesn't matter. I want economic opportunity and protection of natural resources. Where do I fall on the political spectrum? I don't agree with any of them.
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
26623 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:44 pm to
It's why I brought this up for discussion. You can see the clearly divided politics of it at the federal level, and people will argue for their side.

But at the local level, it looks like there's a lot of agreement. It's a pretty unique circumstance considering today's political craziness.

I was also happy to see new information about energy consumption. The water angle is more arguable, but the power consumption seems to be another agreeable point.
This post was edited on 3/30/26 at 1:45 pm
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23650 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:45 pm to
quote:

I don’t really know what “delivering $2.65 billion in customer benefits” means. Do you? It’s all deliberately obscure. Even if that were Meta’s actual contract value with Entergy, I’m not sure how anyone could possibly determine whether that’s good or bad for the rate-paying public without the full details being released.




There is quite a bit to unpack about the energy usage and the cost vs contributions associated. The costs are being advertised as well as some of the contributions from META. However, its not all fully known as alot of the details are confidential. Generally, contribution in aid is given by the end user to fund building and network upgrades. These costs are generally known and, we are being told, are being paid upfront by META. The next 15 years of maintenance are also being funded by META, supposedly. A poster said the pay off is 45 years. If true, the last 30 years will be paid by customers in MISO South (ie, all of us) at a time where the units will need the most care. It's something that the PSC is missing, IMO.

The good....generation capacity is struggling to keep in in Louisiana, and all of MISO, even today. Entergy cannot support its own load and is purchasing from the market today. That bring up the cost of generation (supply and demand). With the building of new generation units, they will bring the supply up, hopefully, the demand down, and level off the price of capacity in MISO and specifically, Zone 9.

I know, alot of projection in that, but that is the simplest way of putting it.
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30089 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:48 pm to
quote:

The bulk of the reasonable and intelligent people in this country cannot align with either side anymore. You can't be both a capitalist and an environmentalist anymore. For people who are largely single-issue voters it doesn't matter. I want economic opportunity and protection of natural resources. Where do I fall on the political spectrum? I don't agree with any of them.


Yup. And when you say something like, “I don’t want that eyesore in my backyard using all the water”, suddenly you’re an anti-capitalist commie.

My city has made national news for poor prep in a situation where we are literally running out of water. I’d protest the building of a data center right now.
Posted by Funky Tide 8
Bayou Chico
Member since Feb 2009
56840 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:50 pm to
quote:

This really highlights the need for a new centralist political party.

The bulk of the reasonable and intelligent people in this country cannot align with either side anymore.

You can't be both a capitalist and an environmentalist anymore. For people who are largely single-issue voters it doesn't matter. I want economic opportunity and protection of natural resources. Where do I fall on the political spectrum? I don't agree with any of them.


Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72063 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:55 pm to
quote:

suddenly you’re an anti-capitalist commie.


Yep and the reality is, nobody wants any gigantic industrial shite in their back yard except people who currently have zero means to earn a pay check right now.

I don't want it in my back yard, and I also do not want it destroying the planet.

That makes me a pinko commie anti capitalist blue haired sky screamer these days

But, I voted for Trump 3 times

So that makes me a MAGA earth destroying meanie poopie pants

Moral of the story - I'm finding out that I'm apolitical. I don't give a shite who "wins." I want my children to be a rung higher on the social ladder than I am, and I want them to have a green earth full of wildlife for them to hunt and fish, clean water to drink, clean air to breathe, a ripping arse economy, in a country with the unquestioned ability to militarily inflict its will on anyone in the world at any time. Is that too much to ask of America?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72063 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 1:58 pm to
quote:

The good....generation capacity is struggling to keep in in Louisiana, and all of MISO, even today. Entergy cannot support its own load and is purchasing from the market today. That bring up the cost of generation (supply and demand). With the building of new generation units, they will bring the supply up, hopefully, the demand down, and level off the price of capacity in MISO and specifically, Zone 9.


I keep hearing data centers are strongly considering ICE power generation on site in anticipation of purchase power costs rising unsustainable.

As in, line up a shitload of gas turbine generators and sync to the grid. Hard to wrap your head around the energy usage required for that to make sense, but I know it's being considered and possibly already being implemented. I don't have that much visibility behind the curtain.
Posted by CollegeFBRules
Member since Oct 2008
25709 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 2:01 pm to
quote:

but a single industrial facility that uses more water in a day than a neighborhood does in a month doesn’t even get asked if they can consider any conservation strategies.


Some industries legit cannot conserve water without drastically slowing or stopping their operation, and then that will impact jobs, etc. Believe me, I’m not defending data centers, I think they are a scourge in their communities and for what they mean for the future.
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72063 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 2:08 pm to
quote:

Some industries legit cannot conserve water without drastically slowing or stopping their operation


Sure, it's a massive financial burden to do it, but it can be done.

Hell I know of some facilities that both use aquifer water to supply evap cooling systems AND use injection wells to dispose effluent, because back in the day that was permitted and they're "grandfathered in" to use those systems.

I get it, it would massively suck for that company and it's share holders to do something about either of those things. How much money have they saved / made over the past 70+ years of operating that way? Why can we all not agree that it never made good sense to do that, come up with a better way, and figure out a plan to get there rather than "that sounds expensive frick that" and 30 years from now our kids will be wondering why the hell did we not fix that?
Posted by TexasTiger08
Member since Oct 2006
30089 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 2:20 pm to
quote:

I don't give a shite who "wins." I want my children to be a rung higher on the social ladder than I am, and I want them to have a green earth full of wildlife for them to hunt and fish, clean water to drink, clean air to breathe, a ripping arse economy, in a country with the unquestioned ability to militarily inflict its will on anyone in the world at any time. Is that too much to ask of America?


Nailed it
Posted by SaintEB
Member since Jul 2008
23650 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 2:24 pm to
quote:

As in, line up a shitload of gas turbine generators and sync to the grid. Hard to wrap your head around the energy usage required for that to make sense, but I know it's being considered and possibly already being implemented. I don't have that much visibility behind the curtain.



This has been done by large industrial sites for a long time. They will build their own generation, typically gas combustion turbines or combined cycle (CTs and Steam turbines combined) for their own usage. Also, they will build more than needed, tie to the grid, and sell on the market. Entergy will do this with META and any hyperscaler that builds their own generation should absolutely do this. New LPSC guidelines say that any large load connection that is 5% of the load serving entity's max has to cover the cost of their energy requirements. While not yet an order, I'm assuming will soon be.
Posted by StringedInstruments
Member since Oct 2013
20868 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 2:35 pm to
quote:

Is that too much to ask of America?


What if it is?

You need regulations that inhibit innovation, which is anti-capitalist. Part of the problem is that other countries will pursue that innovation, leaving America behind in advancing into the future.

I don't have a solution, but I also recognize that humanity is a scourge on the planet. We've been obliterating natural resources for a few hundred years now in the name of capitalistic pursuit. Now that we've reached the point where we realize what we're doing is only going to end in eventual disaster, we still refuse to slow down. Hell, our best capitalists look at the situation and say, "Hey! We've gotta get out of here!"

Again, I don't know the solution. Slow down capitalism and America falls behind in the long run. Maintain the current pace and watch data centers pop up in communities that don't want them. It's a lose-lose. Maybe we need to get out of here.
Posted by FriscoKid
Red Stick
Member since Jan 2005
5202 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 2:37 pm to
The ones being built all throughout Texas have to have you scratching your head… the majority of the state often has water issues.
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
173555 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 2:44 pm to
quote:

Believe me, I’m not defending data centers, I think they are a scourge in their communities and for what they mean for the future.

Curious where you're going with the last statement
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
72063 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 3:08 pm to
quote:

This has been done by large industrial sites for a long time.


The existing self-powered industrial sites I've been on are on the order of 20MW or so, many of them were using waste heat or byproduct to run the plant as well. The data centers I've seen it explored for are over 100MW and projected future projects are over a GW

Over a million horsepower. To put that into perspective, the Gerald Ford is somewhere around 350,000 hp. That's two small nukes.

Posted by turkish
Member since Aug 2016
2386 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:07 pm to
We can agree on the principle. It’s harder to get people to agree on how much MORE one is willing to pay for products manufactured with this more environmentally responsible kit.

And I agree with you on all this; I’m just reminding that, at the end of the day, it comes back to the pocketbooks of either the consumer or the taxpayer. And many of us are both.
Posted by PhilipMarlowe
Member since Mar 2013
21917 posts
Posted on 3/30/26 at 4:11 pm to
quote:

On a local level, opposition to data centers seems to be pretty bi-partisan. The only people that seem to want them are the people selling their land to them and the politicians they're paying off.


Exactly. And I’m hoping those greedy fricks aren’t able to co-opt it and turn it into a partisan issue. frick these data centers/ai/bitcoin miners.
first pageprev pagePage 6 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram