- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: How many posters here have an ol lady taking the ozempic shot?
Posted on 1/12/25 at 2:20 pm to Jack Daniel
Posted on 1/12/25 at 2:20 pm to Jack Daniel
Fatties been waiting magic pill their whole lives….they all in regardless
Posted on 1/13/25 at 9:46 am to PensaTigers
quote:
a healthy weight for a guy with my height and mass is 220.
must be 6'7" then, baw. did you play in the league?
Posted on 1/13/25 at 9:48 am to RazorBroncs
quote:
Uhhh, do we have the same MIL?
My wife's mother is a known and well established attention whore, especially at family gatherings.
I think that's all MILs baw.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 1:48 pm to tunechi
quote:
must be 6'7" then, baw. did you play in the league?
Just depends. I'm 5'7" and I look my best at about 180-85. That puts me at about 12% Body fat. I can carry 200 and look good. At my current 230, not so much.

Posted on 1/13/25 at 2:20 pm to tunechi
Walk on so nah. Was an all state tackle in florida though. Youre prob right about 220, id say 210 would be better. After that, I lose muscle mass. I have good genetics, always had a ton of muscle without trying, whole dad's side of the family is like that. At 182, I got comments about looking too skinny/sickly/needing to stop and it took starving myself to get that low. Luckily muscle mass is much easier to get back if you had it before.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 2:45 pm to SmackoverHawg
quote:
Just depends. I'm 5'7" and I look my best at about 180-85. That puts me at about 12% Body fat. I can carry 200 and look good. At my current 230, not so much. I had a complete rupture of my patellar tendon and knee dislocation a few years back. Knee immobilizer for 12 weeks then a tedious, low impact rehab for the next year (it was/is fricked). I got in a funk and starting drinking more and eating like shite. I'd never let my weight get about 200 before then. Getting back in gear now. No ozempic or others yet, but am tempted. I was used to burning off extra calories by running it off, now I can't. Did great for 46 years of my life and let it go to shite the last 4.
if 185 at 5'7 puts you truely at 12% bodyfat....you are jacked as frick. more than likely this puts you at closer to 20% and you way underestimate.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 2:45 pm to PensaTigers
quote:
Walk on so nah. Was an all state tackle in florida though. Youre prob right about 220, id say 210 would be better. After that, I lose muscle mass. I have good genetics, always had a ton of muscle without trying, whole dad's side of the family is like that. At 182, I got comments about looking too skinny/sickly/needing to stop and it took starving myself to get that low. Luckily muscle mass is much easier to get back if you had it before.
where you shredded with a true 6 pack? then no you were not too skinny. quit being dumb
Posted on 1/13/25 at 2:48 pm to SuperSaint
quote:
I'd have never heard of this shite if it wasn't for the OT. I also dong congregate with any gross fatties.
yea its hard for crack heads to keep the weight on. so makes sense coming from you.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 2:55 pm to lsu777
Yes. I couldn't have the 6 pack because of some extra skin around the belly. Not a bad amount but sadly enough that I couldn't really see my lower abs as much as my upper ones but the top ones were def visable. My veins were busting out all over though. I lost a decent amount of muscle in my shoulders and legs, im glad that came back. I didn't realize how much I'd shrunk my legs. Im not bragging about the muscle weight, I didn't earn it. It's genetical. But yes 180 I was way too small for me. 210 would prob be ideal. 200 at the least.
Edit: To be clear, shredded isn't the right word. But I was extremely tight all around and cut.
Edit: To be clear, shredded isn't the right word. But I was extremely tight all around and cut.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 2:59 pm
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:00 pm to lsu777
When some of yall or family start having side effects later will yall post on here what they are and how bad so we can all know?
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:05 pm to lsu777
quote:
if 185 at 5'7 puts you truely at 12% bodyfat....you are jacked as frick. more than likely this puts you at closer to 20% and you way underestimate.
For real
I'm 5'11, 165 and probably around 12%
But I'm am animal.
People should be required to post pictures if making claims like that
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:18 pm to jizzle6609
quote:
When some of yall or family start having side effects later will yall post on here what they are and how bad so we can all know?
i mean we already know the side effects, its been in use almost 2 decades now. mainly stems from GI distress from people not eating right no matter what. some people cant be helped. most of the other sides are more from too low caloric and protein intake in about 99% of cases.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:21 pm to Jack Daniel
quote:
I bet it’s a lot more than are willing to admit.
"FDA-approved Lizzo makes you feel good about your weight, and it costs 90% less than Ozempic," ~ South Park, The End of Obesity
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:22 pm to lsu777
While supplements aren't as good as the real thing, when im fasting 2 or 3 days at a time, I'm taking the right stuff to avoid damage. When I do eat, it's high protein meals. I love chicken. Wings are my go to.
Edit: Baked with hot sauce*, not fried.
Edit: Baked with hot sauce*, not fried.
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 3:24 pm
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:23 pm to Jack Daniel
Haven't logged in in a few days forgot how superior people in this great state are.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 3:26 pm to lsu777
quote:
if 185 at 5'7 puts you truely at 12% bodyfat....you are jacked as frick. more than likely this puts you at closer to 20% and you way underestimate.
seems like quite a claim for a 46 year old
This post was edited on 1/13/25 at 3:27 pm
Posted on 1/13/25 at 4:16 pm to lsu777
quote:
i mean we already know the side effects, its been in use almost 2 decades now. mainly stems from GI distress from people not eating right no matter what. some people cant be helped. most of the other sides are more from too low caloric and protein intake in about 99% of cases.
In use makes me believe you had a large audience receiving the drug for 20 years.
Im assuming diabetes patients, and now the trustworthy medical folks we have say its safe for everyone to use?
Interesting.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 4:48 pm to Oates Mustache
It's not normal and thus will have repercussions besides the sunken in face and loose skin.
Posted on 1/13/25 at 4:56 pm to Vincenzo Pantangelli
quote:
It's not normal and thus will have repercussions besides the sunken in face and loose skin.
I’m with you.
A lot of folks seem to think the side effects are nothing to worry about. To each their own.
Popular
Back to top
