Started By
Message

re: How many of you believe Big Foot really exists?

Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:48 pm to
Posted by dpd901
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
7870 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:48 pm to
I think I read that for a species to sustain itself without inbreeding causing genetic problems, there needs to be a population of 10,000 specimens. So, 10,000 large primates would have to go undetected for several centuries for them to be real.

Now, the bigger problem is that there's no fossil record... ostensibly, they would have been in North America for 1000's of years, which means that millions of them would have had to have lived here during that time... not a single skeleton or bone has ever been recovered.

Sorry, Bigfoot ain't real.
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64024 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:50 pm to
quote:

I think I read that for a species to sustain itself without inbreeding causing genetic problems, there needs to be a population of 10,000 specimens. So, 10,000 large primates would have to go undetected for several centuries for them to be real.

Now, the bigger problem is that there's no fossil record... ostensibly, they would have been in North America for 1000's of years, which means that millions of them would have had to have lived here during that time... not a single skeleton or bone has ever been recovered.




10,000? Im sure there's disputing theories on that.

Also, we are still finding dinosaur fossils, there's no reason to think there other significant archaeological finds that haven't been discovered. We haven't searched every square inch of the earth looking for fossils, not even close. It takes a great deal of effort to find fossils and extract them.
Posted by kingbob
Sorrento, LA
Member since Nov 2010
69284 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:53 pm to
I don't think they exist, but I can't fully discount the possibility. We know
Similar species once existed where Bigfoots have allegedly been spotted. We know that those areas are fairly remote and offer enough food for to support an active population, and it's not like we haven't recently discovered many species, like the celocanth, that were thought to have been long ago extinct. Heck, great apes were thought to be nothing but a local legend prior to their discovery in the 1920s.

I don't believe in Bigfoot, because no one has produced credible material DNA evidence or a corpse. However, I see it as possible for the reasons stated above.
Posted by Twenty 49
Shreveport
Member since Jun 2014
20827 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:55 pm to
quote:

There's bears in Arizona?


quote:

This is the first recorded predation by a jaguar on a black bear, and as Neils points out, it occurred where the northern limit of the jaguar’s range reached the southern limit of the black bear’s range.


Smithsonian article
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
15716 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:56 pm to
Posted by Fewer Kilometers
Baton Rouge
Member since Dec 2007
37883 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 10:59 pm to
Big Foot was fun in the 60's and 70's, but with the technology that we have today there is zero chance that he exists.
Posted by Grim
Member since Dec 2013
12489 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:08 pm to
quote:

Yet not one damned game cam or security system has a glimpse of a bigfoot

So tired of seeing this moronic debunked argument. We have literally HUNDREDS of trail cam pictures of sasquatch. Yet every time a new one surfaces people like you write it off as a fake. You can't demand evidence if you're going to dismiss it no matter what
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
148170 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:11 pm to
quote:

We have literally HUNDREDS of trail cam pictures of sasquatch.
why hasn't a body or scat or anything showed up around the areas of these trail cameras?


Oh and I'm guessing there just happens to be Big Foots all over North America and every other continent too right?
Posted by DownshiftAndFloorIt
Here
Member since Jan 2011
70955 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:12 pm to
Not a chance. Zero.

With how widespread trail cameras are now with hunters, he'd have been busted long ago.
This post was edited on 1/8/17 at 11:13 pm
Posted by dpd901
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
7870 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:15 pm to
[quote]Also, we are still finding dinosaur fossils, there's no reason to think there other significant archaeological finds that haven't been discovered. [/quote

The difference between dinosaurs and Big Foot is that we have found fossils... thousands and thousands of them. I can google pictures of them and go touch them in museums. And dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago. Big Foot still allegedly exists, and yet, not a hair. Not a tooth, not a finger, not a pile of scat. Much less a fossil.

There is zero concrete evidence that a large primate species besides humans have EVER lived in North America.
Posted by Peter Venkman
Jackson, TN
Member since Aug 2016
2605 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:15 pm to
Here's the really important question: is the plural form of big foot big feet or big foots?
Posted by Grim
Member since Dec 2013
12489 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:16 pm to
quote:

With how widespread trail cameras are now with hunters, he'd have been busted long ago.

For frick sake...
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64024 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:17 pm to
quote:

Here's the really important question: is the plural form of big foot big feet or big foots?


Big footses.
Posted by ManBearTiger
BRLA
Member since Jun 2007
22311 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:21 pm to
Paging crazy San Francisco bay serpent-hunting poster
Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64024 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:23 pm to
quote:


The difference between dinosaurs and Big Foot is that we have found fossils... thousands and thousands of them. I can google pictures of them and go touch them in museums. And dinosaurs died out 65 million years ago. Big Foot still allegedly exists, and yet, not a hair. Not a tooth, not a finger, not a pile of scat. Much less a fossil.



But not ALL of them. Within the last 10 years we've found lots of new fossil evidence that have changed the long held views of dinosaur traits and behaviors.




Posted by MadDoggyStyle
Member since Feb 2012
3857 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:24 pm to
How big is this foot you speak of?
Posted by SEClint
New Orleans, LA/Portland, OR
Member since Nov 2006
49476 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:24 pm to
my uncle has quite a few on his land, my cousin and I thought about throwing on a ghillie suit and wearing some platforms with big feet cut-outs one night to mess with his mind.

Posted by tiggerthetooth
Big Momma's House
Member since Oct 2010
64024 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:27 pm to
quote:

and I thought about throwing on a ghillie suit


Greatest use of a ghillie suit ever
Posted by Pepe Lepew
Looney tuned .....
Member since Oct 2008
37915 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:54 pm to
There was a large ape group in Africa that local native people have seen on occasion for decades, they were finally filmed in 2004. 300lb apes, never found any bones or their habitats, fwiw....
Posted by dpd901
South Louisiana
Member since Apr 2011
7870 posts
Posted on 1/8/17 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

But not ALL of them. Within the last 10 years we've found lots of new fossil evidence that have changed the long held views of dinosaur traits and behaviors.


Ok, so the way science works is that you propose a hypothesis: A large primate species exists in North America

Then you test it: Is there concrete physical evidence that a large primate species exists in America? Does that evidence stand up to scientific testing and peer review? No and No

Then you draw a conclusion: based on the results of extensive scientific investigation and the complete lack of a single quantifiable shred of physical evidence, not a single fossil in the entire paleontological body scientific, it can stated with almost 100 percent certainty, that a large nonhuman primate species does not now, nor has ever existed on the North American continent. However, if evidence to the contrary is found in the future, and stands up to rigorous scientific scrutiny, this theory would at that point be revised to reflect that evidence.


Extraordinary claims require extraordinary proof. Now if you just want to believe in Bigfoot, cause it's awesome, then more power to ya!
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 8Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram