- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Honolulu police tell legal marijuana users to turn in their firearms
Posted on 11/30/17 at 5:05 pm to LSUintheNW
Posted on 11/30/17 at 5:05 pm to LSUintheNW
I wonder if having a license that allows me to operate a motor vehicle on public highways means I have to turn in my liquor in my liquor cabinet?
Do yall think I should bury my liquor in my backyard or drop my auto insurance and start driving without license and insurance?
Do yall think I should bury my liquor in my backyard or drop my auto insurance and start driving without license and insurance?
This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 5:06 pm
0
Posted on 11/30/17 at 5:05 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
30 medical marijuana card holders
This cannot be all of them, can it? This has to be a subset with some other "risk factor" right?
Posted on 11/30/17 at 5:08 pm to LSUintheNW
Per the article:
What the frick does this piece of legislation have to do with marajuwana?
quote:
In the letter, Ballard cites Hawaii Revised Statutes, Section 134-7 (a) as the reason for the move. That section reads: “No person who is a fugitive from justice or is a person prohibited from possessing firearms or ammunition under federal law shall own, possess, or control any firearm or ammunition therefor.”
What the frick does this piece of legislation have to do with marajuwana?
This post was edited on 11/30/17 at 5:10 pm
Posted on 11/30/17 at 5:17 pm to LSUintheNW
Lost them in a boating accident
Posted on 11/30/17 at 5:45 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
In a letter to about 30 medical marijuana card holders on Oahu, the police said “you have 30 days upon receipt of this letter to voluntarily surrender your firearms.”
Posted on 11/30/17 at 5:50 pm to 14&Counting
If I surrendered anything it would be my card first. Tons of pot there.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 5:55 pm to terd ferguson
quote:
You want to know why having to register your guns is a big deal? This right here is why. Hawaii requires you to register your firearms.
AND WE HAVE A WINNER.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:00 pm to LSUintheNW
Somebody stoned on cannabis is far less likely to shoot someone than somebody that is drunk on alcohol. Those Honolulu cops should be much more concerned with all the meth tweekers around there shooting somebody rather than a pothead. But it's usually really stupid frickin people that run this country.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:12 pm to nola000
18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1-9) prohibits the following from possessing, shipping/transporting, or receiving any firearm or ammunition:
(1) a person convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year;
(2) a person who is a fugitive from justice;
(3) a person who is an unlawful user of or who is addicted to a controlled substance;
Seems to me, if it's legal and prescribed, they're not "unlawful users".
(1) a person convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year;
(2) a person who is a fugitive from justice;
(3) a person who is an unlawful user of or who is addicted to a controlled substance;
Seems to me, if it's legal and prescribed, they're not "unlawful users".
Posted on 11/30/17 at 6:19 pm to bamagreycoat
I'll be curious to see how this plays out. I don't see how they can legally do this, or attempt to do so.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:00 pm to BrotherEsau
quote:
U.S.C. § 922(g)(1-9) prohibits the following from possessing, shipping/transporting, or receiving any firearm or ammunition:
(1) a person convicted of a crime punishable by imprisonment exceeding one year;
(2) a person who is a fugitive from justice;
(3) a person who is an unlawful user of or who is addicted to a controlled substance;
Seems to me, if it's legal and prescribed, they're not "unlawful users".
Federal law supercedes state law so it's not legal and they are all "unlawful" users.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:06 pm to JamalSanders
And this is why the Feds must reschedule. Simply telling the DOJ not to prosecute med mj cases isn’t good enough. fricking Obama could have got this done.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:13 pm to JamalSanders
quote:
Federal law supercedes state law so it's not legal and they are all "unlawful" users.
That is correct but...
Marajuwana is illegal per Federal law.
Hawaii refuses to enforce Federal law and in fact, issues licenses to break that law.
Hawaii then uses an associated Federal law to confiscate weapons and in doing so violates the Constitution for behavior that they themselves are illegally licensing for.
Apparently the citizens of Hawaii arent the only ones smoking dope. Are those sheriffs getting in the evidence locker again? Shame.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:19 pm to JamalSanders
quote:
Federal law supercedes state law so it's not legal and they are all "unlawful" users.
meh,
If it required a constitutional amendment for the Feds to ban alcohol... clearly current federal drug laws are unconstitutional.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:20 pm to JamalSanders
quote:
Federal law supercedes state law
Only where Federal law actually has standing. The Federalies dont actually have constitutional authority to regulate drug use within the various States. They hide behind the commerce clause to regulate it between the States. Which is a fricking stretch at best because its not regulating anything theyre outright prohibiting it.
I think the only reason they havent challenged the States over this in SCOTUS is because they dont want to open that can of worms. They stand to lose ALL their power if they do that. They would rather people believe they have a power they dont then to challenge the States and remove all doubt. This is what "States Rights" are all about.
frick yeah!Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:26 pm to LSUintheNW
Unconstitutional, and it's not even debatable. This won't stand for long.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 7:29 pm to LSUintheNW
quote:
I don't see how they can legally do this, or attempt to do so
Yes, but if memory serves, you also thought unemployment payments came from your "account" into which you had 'paid' said funds. I am not too sure that you are able to grasp the intricacies of legal issues.
Weren't you also going to look up Terd Ferguson and whip his arse when you returned on a visit to Louisiana?
Let me know if I am way off base with this...after you finish your Doritos.
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:34 pm to el Gaucho
There’s no such thing as marijuana addiction
Posted on 11/30/17 at 8:55 pm to TigerStripes06
quote:
There’s no such thing as marijuana addiction
denial is the first sign you're addicted
Posted on 12/1/17 at 8:41 am to DeafJam73
quote:
Unconstitutional, and it's not even debatable. This won't stand for long.
It could stand forever if someone doesnt challenge it and with only 30 people affected it may go unchallenged for a very long time.
Page 2 of 3
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News