re: Greenpeace co-founder - globalists cut off fossil fuels & fertilizers to reduce population

The world population is about to take sharp turn in the down direction.

The war in Ukraine is about to spread. War in Arminia has started.

And it looks like Africa is about to have a regional war as the puppets of France (ECOWAS) Fight the old French colonies that are trying to remove France from its control.

Think do not look bright. War and it's affects are going to continue to grow.

When you prioritize the earth instead of it's inhabitants you end up here.

quote:

---

Can someone translate this?

---

Agrarian societies have a shitload of kids because they're free labor. When people move from the farm to the city to take manufacturing or office jobs, the kids become major expenses so they have fewer of them. Birth rates have been declining in the industrialized world for a few decades. In fact, China's population is likely to be half of what it is currently by the end of the century. Japan and Europe aren't far behind.

because it was a lefty word salad

quote:

---

IDK why you got all the downvotes.

---

Because everyone on here wants to view the world and everything that happens in it through their own ideological filters. It never occurs to them that we can experience natural economic and demographic phenomena independent of politics.

Interesting. I agree with the founder of Greenpeace. At least on this topic. I feel a little dirty.

quote:

---

Birth rates are declining in the industrialized world and it has nothing to do with politics.

---

It has something to do with politics, but it’s not wedge identity woke bs. It has everything to do with economics. If you follow historical economic trends, the average age of first child and first marriage in Europe directly correlates with changes in cost of living. People marry later and have fewer children when relative cost of living rises, making having a family less affordable. The current trend matches historical trends for when economic times are REALLY bad, I’m talking pre-Revolutionary France bad. The metrics in the United States (which are currently some of the best in the developed world) are actually significantly worse than France or Russia pre-revolution. Housing is unaffordable, food has tripled in price in recent years, supply chains are constantly being interrupted, and a very sizable percentage of the young male population has close to zero chances of ever marrying or having children. When times are this bad, that demo must be killed off by war or they revolt en-masse historically. We’re not just approaching danger territory. We‘re so far beyond it that economists and historians are literally racking their brains to figure out why the crisis hasn’t started yet or if it’s already underway.

EVERY socio-economic metric is trending towards a MASSIVE crisis. Those who survive it will inherit a golden age, but the developed world looks primed to experience on par with the Crisis of the 17th Century and the chaos that ensued in the wake of the Plague of Justinian in the 6th Century.

quote:

---

Is the website thats on your profile www.survival-manual.com your creation?

---

Yes

quote:

---

Greenpeace co-founder, Dr. Patrick Moore

---

I have no comment on the subject other than to say that it is quite the turn for some here when they have come to view Greenpeace as an ally.

That’s because carbon bullshite fighting climate change has soaked up all of the money and attention that would otherwise go to actual threats to the environments and habitats of the planet like degrading aquifers, toxic waste spills, garbage patches in the ocean, logging the rainforest, fertilizer runoff causing algae blooms and hypoxia, invasive species like water hyacinths and kudzu, etc.