Started By
Message

GDP of each US state

Posted on 2/23/25 at 3:31 am
Posted by Street Hawk
Member since Nov 2014
3558 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 3:31 am
Posted by cascadia
Georgia
Member since Jan 2014
2305 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 4:49 am to
Washington #9 biggest surprise imo
Posted by X123F45
Member since Apr 2015
28776 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 5:07 am to
Those stats are, I believe, projections for 2025.

An interesting metric is gdp per capita.

I would make the argument that in a single country it would be better to live in a state that falls in the upper middle rather than the top 5%.

You're more likely to have a lower cost of living and a higher than average income.
Posted by Ace Midnight
Between sanity and madness
Member since Dec 2006
92622 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 5:07 am to
quote:


Washington #9 biggest surprise imo


Boeing, Microsoft, Amazon, Costo, Starbucks, Weyerhauser, T-Mobile

Posted by Geauxldilocks
Member since Aug 2018
4134 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 5:10 am to
quote:

Boeing


Moved its HQ to VA, but still plenty of operations in WA.
Posted by IAmNERD
Member since May 2017
21757 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 5:16 am to
quote:

An interesting metric is gdp per capita.

It was in the response to that post.
Loading Twitter/X Embed...
If tweet fails to load, click here.
Posted by Marshhen
Port Eads
Member since Nov 2018
880 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 5:31 am to
quote:

An interesting metric is gdp per capita.


U.S. States by GDP Per Capita (2023, Highest to Lowest)
1 New York: $117,332
2 Massachusetts: $110,561
3 Washington: $108,468
4 California: $103,129
5 Delaware: $100,557
6 Connecticut: $98,676
7 Alaska: $92,867
8 North Dakota: $92,421
9 Wyoming: $88,925
10 New Jersey: $87,663
11 Maryland: $86,495
12 Illinois: $85,831
13 Colorado: $85,204
14 Nebraska: $83,602
15 Hawaii: $80,729
16 Minnesota: $80,513
17 New Hampshire: $80,489
18 South Dakota: $79,889
19 Texas: $79,151
20 Virginia: $78,816
21 Oregon: $77,117
22 Pennsylvania: $76,753
23 Iowa: $75,589
24 Nevada: $74,888
25 Rhode Island: $74,567
26 Kansas: $74,093
27 Utah: $73,531
28 Georgia: $72,523
29 Ohio: $71,328
30 Wisconsin: $70,305
31 Indiana: $68,077
32 Tennessee: $67,927
33 North Carolina: $67,589
34 Florida: $67,384
35 Montana: $67,291
36 Oklahoma: $66,949
37 Louisiana: $66,639
38 Missouri: $66,091
39 Vermont: $65,078
40 Michigan: $64,843
41 Arizona: $64,750
42 Maine: $64,596
43 Idaho: $62,082
44 South Carolina: $61,499
45 Kentucky: $61,254
46 Alabama: $60,985
47 West Virginia: $60,783
48 Arkansas: $60,276
49 New Mexico: $59,893
50 Mississippi: $53,061

Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
8656 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 5:43 am to
37 is not bad.

There's an obvious disconnect when we are consistently the poorest or second poorest state in the nation.

I wonder what could possibly be going on
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 6:35 am
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
23830 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 6:01 am to
#1 and #3 are broke while #2 strives.

One clue as to why
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 6:03 am
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
8656 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 6:24 am to
quote:

#1 and #3 are broke while #2 strives.


Since when is Washington broke?
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
282854 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 6:25 am to
quote:


An interesting metric is gdp per capita.


Right. This is the data you want.
Posted by funnystuff
Member since Nov 2012
8816 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 6:28 am to
GDP is Gross Domestic Product… Domestic being the operative word, for the sake of your post

Which is to say, GDP isn’t about which company makes the good… it’s about what goods are produced within the physical border of the state. So if this calculation was done correctly, having Starbucks in Washington, for example, won’t add the entire corporate revenue stream for Starbucks into Washington’s GDP. Only those cups of coffee physically produced inside the state’s borders should count. So if they calculated GDP correctly, I’d still be surprised about Washington in the top 10 list.

But maybe Boeing and Microsoft have a bunch of manufacturing plants there?
That’s what you would need from these companies to tick up the state’s GDP, actual production of goods and services inside the state’s physical borders. Not just the location of their headquarters.
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
23830 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 6:30 am to
quote:

Since when is Washington broke?


Are you Stupid or Dumb ? Where does it say Washington is #1 or #3 ?

1. California: $4.132 trillion
2. Texas: $2.695 trillion
3. New York: $2.284 trillion
Posted by Odysseus32
Member since Dec 2009
8656 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 6:31 am to
Look per capita.

Just a tip, when conversing with someone it’s not a good idea to start with calling someone something derogatory.

Make your point first so that they listen without their guard up.

You fricking retard.
This post was edited on 2/23/25 at 6:33 am
Posted by The Torch
DFW The Dub
Member since Aug 2014
23830 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 6:34 am to
quote:

GDP of each US state


Read the title of the thread RETARD


My state is #2 so F you
Posted by Cuz413
Member since Nov 2007
9230 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 6:50 am to
quote:

1 New York: $117,332
2 Massachusetts: $110,561
3 Washington: $108,468
4 California: $103,129
5 Delaware: $100,557


And Washington DC $260,000

All those public servants
Posted by Laugh More
Member since Jan 2022
2641 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 7:27 am to
Do we have comparisons with other EU countries vs States?

I’d love to see which countries rank where in (or outside) our 50 States.
Posted by UltimaParadox
North Carolina
Member since Nov 2008
47373 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 7:27 am to
quote:

All those public servants


You mean lawyers
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
11568 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 7:33 am to
quote:

GDP is Gross Domestic Product… Domestic being the operative word, for the sake of your post

Which is to say, GDP isn’t about which company makes the good… it’s about what goods are produced within the physical border of the state. So if this calculation was done correctly, having Starbucks in Washington, for example, won’t add the entire corporate revenue stream for Starbucks into Washington’s GDP. Only those cups of coffee physically produced inside the state’s borders should count. So if they calculated GDP correctly, I’d still be surprised about Washington in the top 10 list.

But maybe Boeing and Microsoft have a bunch of manufacturing plants there?
That’s what you would need from these companies to tick up the state’s GDP, actual production of goods and services inside the state’s physical borders. Not just the location of their headquarters.
Timber
Posted by Hayekian serf
GA
Member since Dec 2020
3605 posts
Posted on 2/23/25 at 7:41 am to
quote:

Washington #9 biggest surprise imo


They have some massive corporations headquarters
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 4Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram