- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Frozen embryo from 1994 born as world’s oldest baby
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:29 pm to Kentucker
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:29 pm to Kentucker
quote:
And their population increases are responsible for the added 1 billion every 12-13 years.
The rate of that growth is decreasing, and rapidly. The world population will not continue to grow at that pace as Africa slowly joins the 19th century.
Global population could very well be contracting within the next century or so.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:30 pm to Kentucker
quote:
That’s 3 out of 195 countries and a cumulative population of 500 million out of 8.5 billion.
It’s also nowhere near the only places where it’s declining rapidly. Most of the world is experiencing lower rates, even places that are still above replacement rates.
Very few countries have birth rates that are currently increasing from ten years ago.
This post was edited on 8/1/25 at 7:32 pm
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:46 pm to Furious
quote:
That baby’s soul is no longer in limbo. Thank God, he was born.
Makes me think about the rest who are still frozen.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 7:58 pm to dallastigers
A frozen soul. A small angel in ice. Makes me feel very lonely thinking about it.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:02 pm to hawgfaninc
quote:
Archerd went on to divorce him, but she won custody of the embryos
Bruh
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:45 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
It’s also nowhere near the only places where it’s declining rapidly. Most of the world is experiencing lower rates, even places that are still above replacement rates. Very few countries have birth rates that are currently increasing from ten years ago.
Well, some of those other 192 countries are really exploding because the world population certainly is. I asked Gemini to show the billion-mark milestones of human population growth. Here is its research:
Here's a breakdown of the population milestones:
• The time it took to add a billion people has varied throughout history. It took all of human history until around 1800 to reach 1 billion people. The second billion took about 123 years. The third billion took about 50 years.
• The pace of growth accelerated significantly, and the period of 12-13 years for adding a billion people was a recent trend. The population went from:
• 4 billion to 5 billion in 13 years (1974-1987)
• 5 billion to 6 billion in 12 years (1987-1999)
• 6 billion to 7 billion in 12 years (1999-2011)
• 7 billion to 8 billion in 11 years (2011-2022)
From this data it’s easy to see that the pace of human population growth is increasing, not decreasing. Many people fail to see the big picture.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:53 pm to Kentucker
quote:
From this data it’s easy to see that the pace of human population growth is increasing, not decreasing. Many people fail to see the big picture.
The rate of increase is decreasing. And will continue to do so—drastically. The very stat you point to says the opposite of your post. The rate of growth as a percentage of world population every 12 years or so is decreasing. From 4 to 5 billion we added 25% of the population in a dozen years. From 7 billion to 8 billion is less than 15% increase.
But the fact that you ran to AI to regurgitate basic facts tells me all I need to know so there’s no need to discuss further
This post was edited on 8/1/25 at 8:57 pm
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:54 pm to pelicanpride
quote:
It’s much higher with modern freezing techniques, well over 90%
I was hoping that was the case. The 65% was what the Dr's told us 16 years ago. Unfortunately, we lost a child during the thaw cycle, but we were blessed with the pregnancy of our daughter a couple of months later.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:56 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
But the fact that you ran to AI to regurgitate basic facts tells me all I need to know so there’s no need to discuss further
That’s a ridiculous take on your part. AI is a valuable research tool at present. I think you know the truth that the earth’s population is increasing rapidly and you just don’t want to admit it. U b u.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:58 pm to hawgfaninc
The next global demonic authoritarian fascist attempt at eugenics is going to be terrifying
Posted on 8/1/25 at 8:59 pm to Kentucker
quote:
AI is a valuable research tool at present
So valuable that it gave you what exactly?
AI is a crutch for research that spits out nonsense more often than not and just compensates for someone’s inability to formulate and articulate their own thoughts.
quote:
think you know the truth that the earth’s population is increasing rapidly and you just don’t want to admit it. U b u.
As I’ve said numerous times, and the numbers your own shitty AI post confirm, is that the rate of growth has slowed enormously and will continue to do so, and will eventually contract.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:15 pm to Indefatigable
quote:
As I’ve said numerous times, and the numbers your own shitty AI post confirm, is that the rate of growth has slowed enormously and will continue to do so, and will eventually contract.
There’s no need to be rude. It just indicates that you’re getting annoyed.
Are you getting annoyed because I’m not accepting your word? That I fail to accept that you’re an authority on world population?
I chose to offer AI research to back up my claim that the earth’s population is increasing at an increasing rate. If you can’t see that from my last post, then you’re horrible at math.
You’ve just posted what you think and expect me to accept it.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:21 pm to dgnx6
quote:
Or maybe old embryos you get less autistics since everyone under 30 seems to be on the spectrum.
And he won’t be allergic to peanuts either.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:23 pm to Kentucker
quote:No one should be discouraged from having children - that's a basic instinct...to want to procreate and have offspring.
Part of managing the population is also to discourage those who can’t afford children to not have them.
Instead, we should be encouraging parents to provide for their children and to nourish their bodies, souls, and minds.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:34 pm to Oates Mustache
quote:
What in the actual frick.
She may have figured a female partner wouldn’t mind a child from another “man’s” sperm. Wait, now I see, what in the actual frick?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:35 pm to FearTheFish
quote:
No one should be discouraged from having children - that's a basic instinct...to want to procreate and have offspring. Instead, we should be encouraging parents to provide for their children and to nourish their bodies, souls, and minds.
How do you get people who are poor and living hand-to-mouth to listen and adhere to such a message? Who tells them that? What’s their motivation to listen to the message?
Posted on 8/1/25 at 9:39 pm to Kentucker
quote:
I wish our species had as much interest in managing our population as we do in finding ways to have more babies.
The world is underpopulated, not over.
Posted on 8/1/25 at 10:07 pm to Kentucker
quote:
I chose to offer AI research to back up my claim that the earth’s population is increasing at an increasing rate. If you can’t see that from my last post, then you’re horrible at math.
Your AI slop post literally shows a declining rate of increase
4 to 5 billion in 12 years is a 25% increase.
7 to 8 billion in 12 years is less than a 15% increase.
No, that is not an increasing rate.
This post was edited on 8/1/25 at 10:13 pm
Posted on 8/1/25 at 10:17 pm to hawgfaninc
First reaction- wow- this is great- happy this embryo worked out! Very cool.
Secondary thoughts- tons of these don’t get used/left on ice/disposed of?
And it feels weird
Secondary thoughts- tons of these don’t get used/left on ice/disposed of?
And it feels weird
Popular
Back to top


0





