Started By
Message

re: For those who still think the bat flu is real

Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:15 pm to
Posted by madmaxvol
Infinity + 1 Posts
Member since Oct 2011
22489 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:15 pm to
It was real enough for my friend's wife who died from it in April.
Posted by keakar
Member since Jan 2017
30152 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:19 pm to
quote:

Hell I don’t know what it’s supposed to mean but I thought it was weird that no matter what number you use, there will be a story on new cases with that amount.


so if you put in the number 000 they will report zero new cases?
Posted by WhuckFistle
Member since Jul 2015
3434 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:22 pm to
Guess I should’ve phrased it differently. I honestly believe there is a virus but I still don’t believe it’s as bad as they are saying. I honestly have not heard of anyone I know or anyone in my friends families that have tested positives for it. Now I do think a lot of people had it before all this started and they wrote it off as the flu or other kind of sickness.
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
7897 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:23 pm to
quote:

Try this.

Do a google search for any 3 digit number followed by new cases. For example 444 new cases. Do it over and over with a different 3 digit number. See what happens. Maybe It’s just a coincidence but it sure does seem weird.



I dont think this is statically that crazy being there are ~1000 three digit numbers and many different publications all over the world reporting diff number of cases everyday for the last 3+ months
This post was edited on 6/22/20 at 3:24 pm
Posted by Powerman
Member since Jan 2004
175712 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:27 pm to
quote:

I dont think this is statically that crazy being there are ~1000 three digit numbers

900 exactly

Would be every number from 100 to 999

But your point remains. With enough countries and large states reporting new cases every day it's not really unheard of for almost all of those numbers to be utilized. Particularly if there are some variances in reporting on a daily basis from different sources.
Posted by notbilly
alter
Member since Sep 2015
7244 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:36 pm to
quote:

Hell I don’t know what it’s supposed to mean but I thought it was weird that no matter what number you use, there will be a story on new cases with that amount.



It's only weird that you are old enough to operate a computer and have no idea how numbers work. Thousands of entities (countries, states, cities, counties, parishes, etc) have been releasing data for over a hundred days. I'd be surprised if there is a number b/t 100 & 999 that couldn't be found.
Posted by Volvagia
Fort Worth
Member since Mar 2006
53625 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 3:40 pm to
Corona has been a major thing for more than a 100 days now. That’s 5000 possibilities just by state to have a new number. Now imagine separating it by city too. County?

Lots of angles to have at least one representive for one of 899 numbers.

Nvm: long since beaten to the point.
This post was edited on 6/22/20 at 3:46 pm
Posted by BrohemAlem11
Ratchet City, LA
Member since Oct 2014
13925 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 4:22 pm to
quote:

That there is some bullshite going on here


Thanks for all the details and your well thought out analysis
Posted by Mudminnow
Houston, TX
Member since Aug 2004
34216 posts
Posted on 6/22/20 at 4:34 pm to
sweet jesus
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram