re: Football Player Poisons Classmate at STM (Lafayette)

quote:

---

lye

---

NaOH?

Him and his homies might be lying in chalk.

Total hijack, but what happened to the guy that beat the homeless man to death in NOLA? It's like that story disappeared. Surely SOMETHING has happened since then. You can only get so many continuances.

I can't remember his name, I guess I'll google. THe Catholic High guy that was a commercial realtor. Ward, maybe?

It’d be quite the stretch to find any liability on the part of the diocese here.

Moose Billeaud is the husband of Michele Billeaud

Yeah, I’ve had cases with Shelly and I think he’d make a great judge. I’m voting for him too.

do the duty/risk analysis on a 17 year old student entering a janitor’s closet, intentionally grabbing lye, and intentionally poisoning another student with it

Like I said, you can make an argument for the diocese being liable, but it’s pretty specious.

quote:

---

We will first address the issue presented in the School Board's application, i.e., whether the lower courts erred in finding independent liability on its part for failure to supervise the students during this physical education class.2 The trial *346 court found that the School Board was 100% liable for Wallmuth's injuries using the duty-risk analysis of La. C.C. art. 2315,3 finding that “the conduct of the School Board in failing to supervise the students was a cause-in-fact of Joshua Wallmuth's injuries.” On the other hand, the court of appeal found that the School Board was 70% liable for Wallmuth's injuries under La. C.C. art. 2320, which provides, in part, as follows:
Teachers and artisans are answerable for the damage caused by their scholars or apprentices, while under their superintendence.
In the above cases, responsibility only attaches, when the ... teachers or artisans, might have prevented the act which caused the damage, and have not done it.
**8 The court of appeal set out what we believe is the correct standard of liability regarding the liability of a school board for the actions of its students under La. C.C. art. 2320:
A school board, through its agents and teachers, owes a duty of reasonable supervision over students. La. Civ.Code art. 2320; Adams v. Caddo Parish School Bd., 25,370 (La.App. 2 Cir. 1/19/94), 631 So.2d 70, writ denied, 94,684 (La.4/29/94), 637 So.2d 466. The supervision required is reasonable, competent supervision appropriate to the age of the children and the attendant circumstances. Jackson v. Colvin, 98–182 (La.App. 3 Cir. 12/23/98), 732 So.2d 530, writ denied, 99–228 (La.3/19/99), 740 So.2d 117. This duty does not make the school board the insurer of the safety of the children. Id. Constant supervision of all students is not possible nor required for educators to discharge their duty to provide adequate supervision. Adams, 631 So.2d 70.
Before liability can be imposed upon a school board for failure to adequately supervise the safety of students, there must be proof of negligence in providing supervision and also proof of a causal connection between the lack of supervision and the accident. Id. “Injury from horseplay between discerning students which, at some stage may pose an unreasonable risk of harm to the participants, does not automatically and of itself render the supervising authority liable.” Henix v. George, 465 So.2d 906, 910 (La.App. 2 Cir.1985). Furthermore, before a school board can be found to have breached the duty to adequately supervise the safety of students, the risk of unreasonable injury must be foreseeable, constructively or actually known, and preventable if a requisite degree of supervision had been exercised. Id.

---

Wallmuth v. Rapides Par. Sch. Bd., 2001-1779 (La. 4/3/02, 7–8); 813 So.2d 341, 345–46

quote:

---

KemoSabe65

---

Kemo suck these balls, bitch

quote:

---

The kid hired the husband of an ADA who is also running for judge and they recently had a hearing moved due to Covid. Trial scheduled for January 2021

---

So Moose has the criminal case. Who is representing the injured kid in the civil claim?