Started By
Message

re: Florida ends "Alimony for life". Divorced broads are freaking out. This is hilarious.

Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:38 am to
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:38 am to
quote:

Alimony if given, should be maxed out at 2-3 years.

No justification otherwise to keep the gravy train rolling.

Exactly, gives you time to get your shite together and start your own career.
Posted by Bjorn Cyborg
Member since Sep 2016
33933 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:38 am to
quote:

You had your wife stay home and raise the kids while you work. She goes 18 plus years without any work and then you decide to run off with the pool boy. Now she is out of the house and realistically can't get a job doing anything because she's been at home for 20 years and no resume.

That's the basis


Adult choices made by adults.
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295687 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:40 am to
quote:


Adult choices made by adults.


Yep.

Should factor into behavior while married.
Posted by Weekend Warrior79
Member since Aug 2014
20696 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:40 am to
quote:

The husband should only support the ex if he decides to leave for another woman or just because he feels like it. If she makes the choice then she’s on her own as far as I’m concerned. Women need men more than men need women and they should know that when they opt for a divorce they’re forfeiting any support from the husband.

IMO, unfaithfulness and domestic violence were the first 2 reasons why alimony should be considered (not guaranteed) for a while regardless of who initiates the divorce.
Posted by shel311
McKinney, Texas
Member since Aug 2004
112624 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:41 am to
quote:

You had your wife stay home and raise the kids while you work. She goes 18 plus years without any work and then you decide to run off with the pool boy. Now she is out of the house and realistically can't get a job doing anything because she's been at home for 20 years and no resume.

That's the basis
That's pretty logical. The part where you get it for life and if your husband is rich you can absurd amounts of money every month are absurd.

If you can't figure out out how to get a career off the ground after 3 or so years, that's on you.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 10:44 am
Posted by LSU fan 246
Member since Oct 2005
90567 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:43 am to
Agree. I was just giving the reasoning why some of it exists.

Through my friends, I somehow became very versed in divorce proceedings
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295687 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:43 am to
quote:

IMO, unfaithfulness and domestic violence were the first 2 reasons why alimony should be considered


Most people wouldn't have an issue with this, as long as its for a limited time.

The no fault divorce or when the women is at fault, screw alimony. They should have thought of that when married.
Posted by BigBinBR
Baton Rouge
Member since Mar 2023
9232 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:44 am to
quote:

33 years?! She should have to come over to clean his house and suck his dick 3 times a week.


Yep. And she would take him to court every few years when he got a promotion, and the court would give her an increase in alimony.

This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 10:50 am
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106102 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:44 am to
quote:

You had your wife stay home and raise the kids while you work. She goes 18 plus years without any work and then you decide to run off with the pool boy. Now she is out of the house and realistically can't get a job doing anything because she's been at home for 20 years and no resume.


And I don’t have an issue with that. But still not for life.

But alimony for life? That makes no sense to me. The only situation I could see an “alimony for life” situation even being considered is if it’s a couple of retirement age (65+) divorcing and there’s no physical way to make up the difference if the wife/husband hadn’t worked for 20+ years. And even at that, I don’t care for the “for life” caveat.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 10:45 am
Posted by BluegrassBelle
RIP Hefty Lefty - 1981-2019
Member since Nov 2010
106102 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:47 am to
Out of curiosity, what is this bit about from her post?

quote:

also signed a bill that allow paternity to be established by signing a BC


Don’t like that one, at all. I’ve seen guys pressured by family and the like to put their name on a BC. If paternity is in question, it should be left up to a DNA test.

Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
72109 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:48 am to
quote:

Equality


They love the benefits of equality; the responsibilities, not so much.
Posted by TiptonInSC
Aiken, SC
Member since Dec 2012
21062 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:48 am to
quote:

It's funny how a girl can become accustomed to a certain level of finances and the guy has to pay her after they split up but a guy can become accustomed to a certain level of blowjobs and the woman can just drop that to zero after marriage and the court is silent.



Posted by caro81
Member since Jul 2017
6010 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:52 am to
new feminism. strong woman. fight the patriarchy.


ok. here ya go.
Posted by LouisianaLady
Member since Mar 2009
82702 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:53 am to
quote:

What are current alimony laws? The whole concept seems ridiculous.


I can’t speak to Florida, but permanent alimony is a lot less common than people assume here in Louisiana. According to my attorney at least.

People just conflate child support with alimony all the time. Most of the time you hear of men paying out absurd sums of money, it’s child support. Entirely different court, different payment calculator, etc.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 10:57 am
Posted by RogerTheShrubber
Juneau, AK
Member since Jan 2009
295687 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:57 am to
quote:

Equality


They love the benefits of equality; the responsibilities, not so much.


They don't understand equality.

Posted by sqerty
AP
Member since May 2022
8120 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:58 am to
quote:

They love the benefits


coulda stopped right there.
Posted by Proximo
Member since Aug 2011
21994 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:00 am to
alimony is one of the top reasons to require a prenup. of a potential spouse imo
Posted by WaterLink
Baton Rouge
Member since Sep 2015
20580 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:00 am to
quote:

For instance, a woman leaving a marriage in a well-documented domestic violence situation who was forced to remain unemployed (a control tactic in DV situations) should get some support until she’s able to get back on her feet.


Even then that feels like it should be a criminal case where even if they weren't married or dating the victim should be owed compensation.

I do understand alimony for if the woman had to stay at home to raise the kids and has no job prospects and a big gap on her resume. But even then it should be nowhere near a lifetime worth. A year or two should be more than enough time to find work to support yourself.
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:02 am to
quote:

This is a great idea. There's no incentive for divorced chicks to do anything productive if they know they are getting a check every month for the rest of their lives.


This same fundamental component of human nature can also applied to all government handouts...take note.

Lol there is a big difference between living in shitty government housing and surviving on food stamps vs getting 10K a month because you used to be married to a guy that had a lot of money.

I can see the person living in run down housing n the ghetto wanting something better.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 11:03 am
Posted by Corinthians420
Iowa
Member since Jun 2022
16104 posts
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:04 am to
quote:

The fiancé’s ex-wife wanted something like $3,000 a month in alimony because she was purposefully underemployed (even after their daughter was school aged) once she figured out they could live on his salary alone

She could live on 36K a year? Damn. That's a nice subsidy though for sure depending on how underemployed she was.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 11:05 am
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 9Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram