- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Florida ends "Alimony for life". Divorced broads are freaking out. This is hilarious.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:38 am to idlewatcher
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:38 am to idlewatcher
quote:Exactly, gives you time to get your shite together and start your own career.
Alimony if given, should be maxed out at 2-3 years.
No justification otherwise to keep the gravy train rolling.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:38 am to Deactived
quote:
You had your wife stay home and raise the kids while you work. She goes 18 plus years without any work and then you decide to run off with the pool boy. Now she is out of the house and realistically can't get a job doing anything because she's been at home for 20 years and no resume.
That's the basis
Adult choices made by adults.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:40 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
Adult choices made by adults.
Yep.
Should factor into behavior while married.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:40 am to GeauxxxTigers23
quote:
The husband should only support the ex if he decides to leave for another woman or just because he feels like it. If she makes the choice then she’s on her own as far as I’m concerned. Women need men more than men need women and they should know that when they opt for a divorce they’re forfeiting any support from the husband.
IMO, unfaithfulness and domestic violence were the first 2 reasons why alimony should be considered (not guaranteed) for a while regardless of who initiates the divorce.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:41 am to Deactived
quote:That's pretty logical. The part where you get it for life and if your husband is rich you can absurd amounts of money every month are absurd.
You had your wife stay home and raise the kids while you work. She goes 18 plus years without any work and then you decide to run off with the pool boy. Now she is out of the house and realistically can't get a job doing anything because she's been at home for 20 years and no resume.
That's the basis
If you can't figure out out how to get a career off the ground after 3 or so years, that's on you.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 10:44 am
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:43 am to shel311
Agree. I was just giving the reasoning why some of it exists.
Through my friends, I somehow became very versed in divorce proceedings
Through my friends, I somehow became very versed in divorce proceedings
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:43 am to Weekend Warrior79
quote:
IMO, unfaithfulness and domestic violence were the first 2 reasons why alimony should be considered
Most people wouldn't have an issue with this, as long as its for a limited time.
The no fault divorce or when the women is at fault, screw alimony. They should have thought of that when married.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:44 am to wadewilson
quote:
33 years?! She should have to come over to clean his house and suck his dick 3 times a week.
Yep. And she would take him to court every few years when he got a promotion, and the court would give her an increase in alimony.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 10:50 am
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:44 am to Deactived
quote:
You had your wife stay home and raise the kids while you work. She goes 18 plus years without any work and then you decide to run off with the pool boy. Now she is out of the house and realistically can't get a job doing anything because she's been at home for 20 years and no resume.
And I don’t have an issue with that. But still not for life.
But alimony for life? That makes no sense to me. The only situation I could see an “alimony for life” situation even being considered is if it’s a couple of retirement age (65+) divorcing and there’s no physical way to make up the difference if the wife/husband hadn’t worked for 20+ years. And even at that, I don’t care for the “for life” caveat.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 10:45 am
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:47 am to Fun Bunch
Out of curiosity, what is this bit about from her post?
Don’t like that one, at all. I’ve seen guys pressured by family and the like to put their name on a BC. If paternity is in question, it should be left up to a DNA test.
quote:
also signed a bill that allow paternity to be established by signing a BC
Don’t like that one, at all. I’ve seen guys pressured by family and the like to put their name on a BC. If paternity is in question, it should be left up to a DNA test.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:48 am to JetsetNuggs
quote:
Equality
They love the benefits of equality; the responsibilities, not so much.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:48 am to OysterPoBoy
quote:
It's funny how a girl can become accustomed to a certain level of finances and the guy has to pay her after they split up but a guy can become accustomed to a certain level of blowjobs and the woman can just drop that to zero after marriage and the court is silent.

Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:52 am to Ernest T Bass
new feminism. strong woman. fight the patriarchy.
ok. here ya go.
ok. here ya go.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:53 am to Bjorn Cyborg
quote:
What are current alimony laws? The whole concept seems ridiculous.
I can’t speak to Florida, but permanent alimony is a lot less common than people assume here in Louisiana. According to my attorney at least.
People just conflate child support with alimony all the time. Most of the time you hear of men paying out absurd sums of money, it’s child support. Entirely different court, different payment calculator, etc.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 10:57 am
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:57 am to Darth_Vader
quote:
Equality
They love the benefits of equality; the responsibilities, not so much.
They don't understand equality.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 10:58 am to RogerTheShrubber
quote:
They love the benefits
coulda stopped right there.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:00 am to RogerTheShrubber
alimony is one of the top reasons to require a prenup. of a potential spouse imo
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:00 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
For instance, a woman leaving a marriage in a well-documented domestic violence situation who was forced to remain unemployed (a control tactic in DV situations) should get some support until she’s able to get back on her feet.
Even then that feels like it should be a criminal case where even if they weren't married or dating the victim should be owed compensation.
I do understand alimony for if the woman had to stay at home to raise the kids and has no job prospects and a big gap on her resume. But even then it should be nowhere near a lifetime worth. A year or two should be more than enough time to find work to support yourself.
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:02 am to Bubb
quote:
This is a great idea. There's no incentive for divorced chicks to do anything productive if they know they are getting a check every month for the rest of their lives.
This same fundamental component of human nature can also applied to all government handouts...take note.
Lol there is a big difference between living in shitty government housing and surviving on food stamps vs getting 10K a month because you used to be married to a guy that had a lot of money.
I can see the person living in run down housing n the ghetto wanting something better.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 11:03 am
Posted on 7/31/23 at 11:04 am to BluegrassBelle
quote:
The fiancé’s ex-wife wanted something like $3,000 a month in alimony because she was purposefully underemployed (even after their daughter was school aged) once she figured out they could live on his salary alone
She could live on 36K a year? Damn. That's a nice subsidy though for sure depending on how underemployed she was.
This post was edited on 7/31/23 at 11:05 am
Popular
Back to top


0








