- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Florida Cop Shoots Pet Dog Feet From Terrified Homeowners (Graphic)
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:04 pm to NYNolaguy1
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:04 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:Well, I actually think that's a two-way street. I think the culture of the modern police force appeals to a bullying type of personality, while the public is equally to blame for resisting any of its own responsibilities. Ergo, blame lawyers.
the job has become so toxic and villified that no one is applying.
1
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:08 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
lawyers.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:14 pm to TigerFanInSouthland
quote:
Man that sucks. Idk how to feel about this one. That dog did kinda bolt out the door quickly.
I agree with you as much as I hate what happened. The dog took off and hard to tell what to do in that situation. you can sit here and tear apart that video for hours but all that happened in the matter of seconds.
If I were the home owner I'm honestly not sure I wouldn't have gone after the cop p[physically in my yard.
As the cop, the dog did take off quick as hell at him and he reacted.
All in all, he will walk but feel bad about it. He can easily explain this one away but the city will probably settle before letting him explain himself.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:19 pm to NYNolaguy1
quote:
Fortunately we have a real life example as to that exact scenario... On phone can't quote the article.
LINK
Officer tries to shoot homeowners dog- misses, shoots 4 year old girl. Judging by the outcome of the investigation they performed in themselves, they didn't see anything wrong with his actions from what I can tell.
Right, but what would happen if a postal worker or 19 year old pizza delivery boy did the same thing?
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:32 pm to LSUgusto
quote:
dumbass janitors
Wow. It's says a lot about your character that you apparently have more compassion for animals than fellow human beings.
I hope one of those "dumbass janitors" neglects to clean a shite splatter from the under side of the next public toilet you have to use, and you wind up with a brown pecker head.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:37 pm to livewire
Cop had no business on the property or to open any door, if the dumbass cop stays in his car and does the job he is paid to this never happens.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:38 pm to ninthward
quote:
more compassion for animals than fellow human beings
I do, now what?
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:45 pm to livewire
quote:
you apparently have more compassion for animals than fellow human beings
Boy, did you miss the point of that post. But, your pussified triggering is duly noted.
Oh, and one other thing, I've actually been a janitor in my long, industrious career. Worked with some fine folks, too. Some of the best I've ever met. And guess what, anyone who can't move on from that profession is almost certifiably a dumbass. So, there.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 9:45 pm to Asgard Device
quote:
Right, but what would happen if a postal worker or 19 year old pizza delivery boy did the same thing?
Oh I am sure a good DA could come up with some creative charges. Discharging a weapon illegally, child endangerment, aggravated assault... And that assumes he possessed the gun legally. If not he's federally fricked for illegal possession of a gun during a crime.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 10:09 pm to ninthward
quote:
I do, now what?
You marry a Great Dane and live happily ever after.
You tell me.
Posted on 10/21/15 at 10:48 pm to livewire
Did anyone notice the cat getting the hell out of there?
That's why you never hear any stories about cats getting caught up in shooting incidents with cops.
Cats are much more meticulous than dogs.
That's why you never hear any stories about cats getting caught up in shooting incidents with cops.
Cats are much more meticulous than dogs.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:05 am to TigerBait1127
You're wasting your time.
And you do not understand the function and duty of LEO's.
And you do not understand the function and duty of LEO's.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:50 am to craig8sm
quote:
you do not understand the function and duty of LEO's.
That's a really interesting thing to say.
The word duty throws me off a bit, it suggests that cops are somehow legally required to act. Cop don't have to do shite, they are just cops. They have no duty to act.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 7:53 am to Sao
That was awesome.
Pow!
Pow!
This post was edited on 10/22/15 at 7:56 am
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:01 am to Barf
quote:
They have no duty to act
You're wrong. And in most cases they can be punished for not acting.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:11 am to craig8sm
quote:
You're wrong. And in most cases they can be punished for not acting.
No sir. Police are not required to do anything.
Warren v. District of Columbia
quote:
"[t]he duty to provide public services is owed to the public at large, and, absent a special relationship between the police and an individual, no specific legal duty exists.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:19 am to Barf
All I saw was:
arse
Titties
arse n titties
arse arse
Titties titties
arse n titties
arse
Titties
arse n titties
arse arse
Titties titties
arse n titties
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:22 am to sicboy
quote:
I'm not anti cop in the least, but why does this keep happening? Is there just a lack of training with a large portion of law enforcement as far as necessary force?
More and more it's being reinforced that YOU GO HOME, PERIOD. It's the US vs. THEM mentality that is just swept over the entire police force.
Posted on 10/22/15 at 8:46 am to Barf
quote:
Warren v. District of Columbia
Correct, LEO do not have a duty to protect citizens They're job is to investigate crimes and arrest suspected criminals.
The officer in this video was not protecting anyone but himself. And entered the property to investigate an potential crime.
Besides Warren v. District of Columbia sets a precedent that LEO's do not have a duty/obligation to protect, it does not prohibit them from protecting.
ETA: If they see someone getting beat up they will face no charges from going to the defense if that person, just like good samaritan laws will protect citizens from going to the aid of of people too. But that's not what this video was about.
This post was edited on 10/22/15 at 8:49 am
Page 16 of 22
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News