- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Five-Year-Old Tennessee Boy With Autism Branded ‘Sex Offender’ for Hugging Classmates
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:53 am to Centinel
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:53 am to Centinel
quote:
And your expertise to "guess" this is happening is what exactly?
What’s your expertise in assuming it’s not happening in that way, that it was isolated, irregular conduct? That just doesn’t seem to line up with the actions of the school.
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 11:54 am
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:53 am to GumboDave
quote:
Great job at protecting the student's identity.
Exactly what I was going to post.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:54 am to Jon Ham
Very logical leap there. I agree fully.
The admins at East Ridge Elementary in Hamilton County, TN CAN NOT allow a CHRONIC 5 year old autistic sex offender to remain in the classroom. That child is a clear threat to the safety of every student he is around.
The admins at East Ridge Elementary in Hamilton County, TN CAN NOT allow a CHRONIC 5 year old autistic sex offender to remain in the classroom. That child is a clear threat to the safety of every student he is around.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:55 am to Jon Ham
quote:
What’s your expertise in assuming it’s not happening in that way, that it was isolated, irregular conduct?
Because there's been no mention by the school otherwise?
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:57 am to GumboDave
Oh? You think it might have been a bad idea for a newspaper to plaster the name of a 5 year old autistic sex offender all over its paper and website? That paper clearly understands the grave threat represented by this child, as does the admin at the school.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 11:59 am to Centinel
quote:
Because there's been no mention by the school otherwise?
A duck doesn’t have to quack for me to know it’s a duck.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:00 pm to frankthetank
Look I understand some kids have trouble and I understand some kids have autism. But I swear to god in today’s society, too many fricking parents scream their child has autism and refuse to do their fricking job. Guess what shite head, I have seen it first hand that if you do a better job parenting, your kids autism slowly disappears.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:02 pm to frankthetank
Those administrators should be criminally prosecuted for child abuse.
Most kids with autism are afraid of physical contact. If you can get them to hug people they're functioning well and working past the disability. Now thanks to these administrators the kid is going to have a complex.
Most kids with autism are afraid of physical contact. If you can get them to hug people they're functioning well and working past the disability. Now thanks to these administrators the kid is going to have a complex.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:03 pm to LaBornNRaised
Are you part of the administration at East Ridge Elementary in Hamilton County, TN? If so, I support your actions and commend your dedication to providing a safe learning environment for the children.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:03 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
A duck doesn’t have to quack for me to know it’s a duck.
Do you always make shite up about people, or just little kids?
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:06 pm to Bestbank Tiger
You mean there may have been other options than banning the 5 year old autistic chronic sex offender from the classroom and plastering his name all over the paper and internet? There was no other option when safety is at stake.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:06 pm to Centinel
quote:
Do you always make shite up about people, or just little kids?
Do you always disregard rules against inappropriate touching, or just when little girls are the victims?
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:07 pm to Jon Ham
quote:
A duck doesn’t have to quack for me to know it’s a duck.
Let's take your snarky quote and apply to the current situation:
"A 5 year old doesn't have to rape for me to know he's a sexual offender"
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:11 pm to frankthetank
quote:
"A 5 year old doesn't have to rape for me to know he's a sexual offender"
Giving him a “sex offender” label is obviously ridiculous.
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:12 pm to Jon Ham
"A 5 year old doesn't have to rape for me to know he's a sexual offender"
Giving him a “sex offender” label is obviously ridiculous.
Nope. Can't be.
Giving him a “sex offender” label is obviously ridiculous.
Nope. Can't be.
This post was edited on 9/27/19 at 12:14 pm
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:12 pm to frankthetank
clearly wasn't sporting his blue bucket
Posted on 9/27/19 at 12:19 pm to frankthetank
quote:
“The teacher called me and she said, ‘You need to have a talk with Nathan about boundaries.'”
Isn't it also up to the parents of the "victims" to teach their kids about being accepting of others that are different than you?
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News