Started By
Message

re: First Pictures of Nord Stream exploded pipeline

Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:24 am to
Posted by Theduckhunter
South Louisiana
Member since May 2022
1336 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:24 am to
quote:

Why did the US destroy it's ability to be energy independent under Biden on day 1 of his administration?


Because Biden said that’s what he basically wanted to do before he even made it into office. But what does that have to do with the US sabotaging Nord stream?
Posted by Theduckhunter
South Louisiana
Member since May 2022
1336 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:26 am to
quote:

Dude, did you not see the statements by Biden and others threatening to take out the pipeline if Russia invaded Ukraine? Look at the video yourself. It’s all out there for anyone interested in informing themselves.


I haven’t seen it. I’m interested… which is why I’m asking the question. Do you have a link to “the video?”
Posted by Old Money
LSU
Member since Sep 2012
41282 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:35 am to
quote:

Untested russian built infrastructure


Built by a swiss firm, right?
Posted by Tbonepatron
Member since Aug 2013
8462 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 8:59 am to
quote:

twisted metal




My money is on Sweet Tooth
Posted by CleverUserName
Member since Oct 2016
16197 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:02 am to
If there was an exterior explosion…. Why is the metal peeled outward?

I’m still saying some dumbass ship captain drug an anchor across it.
Posted by notsince98
KC, MO
Member since Oct 2012
21319 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 9:43 am to
quote:

Why did the US do this?


To provoke a greater war, duh. They are trying to provoke Russia into expanding the battleground.

Biden's handlers need their wars/income plus the public is always more willing to give up freedom and liberty in exchange for "protection" or safety from the govt. NATO needs a purpose again because people are starting to realize it isn't useful.

There are many reasons why Biden did it and very few for any other explanation.
Posted by Theduckhunter
South Louisiana
Member since May 2022
1336 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:07 am to
quote:

There are many reasons why Biden did it and very few for any other explanation.


So there’s no possibility that Russia did it?

quote:

But officials familiar with the latest intelligence say that Moscow would likely view such a step as worth the price if it helped raise the costs of supporting Ukraine for Europe. US and western intelligence officials believe Russian President Vladimir Putin is gambling that as electricity costs rise and winter approaches, European publics could turn against the Western strategy of isolating Russia economically. Sabotaging the pipelines could "show what Russia is capable of," one US official said. Russia has already taken steps to manipulate energy flows in ways that caused itself economic pain, but also hurt Europe. Russia slashed gas supplies to Europe via Nord Stream 1 before suspending flows altogether in August, blaming Western sanctions for causing technical difficulties. European politicians say that was a pretext to stop supplying gas.


I’m just trying to play the devils advocate here.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
76191 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:29 am to
quote:

They would have had to pressure-test the entire thing to an industry standard acceptance criteria before putting it in service. It’s not even two years old. Methane is clean. Corrosion have would taken years.


I haven't been foloowing closely, do they know which one blew up first?

Thought initially it could have been Nord 2 (Nord 1 as collateral) that is new, correct? One of the delays in Nord 2 was that they couldn't get inspections due to sanctions.
Posted by Langland
Trumplandia
Member since Apr 2014
15382 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:34 am to
quote:

under the ocean

How can you be under the ocean?
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
73118 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:36 am to
one thing is for certain, going to be a rough winter for Europe. ohhh well...sucks to suck.
Posted by In The Know
City of St George, La
Member since Jan 2005
6327 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:40 am to
NordStream Rack has some pretty nice stuff
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37012 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:44 am to
quote:

If there was an exterior explosion…. Why is the metal peeled outward?
I am guessing that a heavy explosion that cuts near through the pipeline could ignite gasses further inside the pipeline depending on the pressure. Not an expert though, obviously.
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37012 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:48 am to
quote:

one thing is for certain, going to be a rough winter for Europe. ohhh well...sucks to suck.

Nord Stream has been in service for 10 years. Obviously there are many other energy means in Europe. They will be fine.
Posted by Klark Kent
Houston via BR
Member since Jan 2008
73118 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:49 am to
quote:

They will be fine.



ohh yeah, you an expert on international energy policy?
Posted by Sao
East Texas Piney Woods
Member since Jun 2009
68469 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:51 am to
quote:

NordStream Rack has some pretty nice stuff


Great prices on the brands you love.
Posted by LSUGBFTL
Member since Aug 2010
530 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:51 am to
This is not at all what a corrosion related failure mechanism would look like. This looks more like a brittle fracture failure which isn’t dependent on age. That being said Im still convinced there is some frickery involved in this failure. Just wanted to point out that an actual failure is possible.
This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 10:52 am
Posted by mmcgrath
Indianapolis
Member since Feb 2010
37012 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 10:56 am to
quote:

What other country had the ability and incentives to do it?
Probably 75% of the world's countries and hundreds of private companies have the ability to do this at 80 meters.
Incentive? Most of the incentive would seem to be with private companies. LNG companies can sign longer and more lucrative contracts. Competing pipelines have obvious advantages. Even Gazprom could possibly recover insurance from lost sales on a destroyed pipeline vs one that is simply turned off.
quote:

Oh, and there just so happened to be US naval activity in the area at the time it happened.
There was also a ton of Russian naval activity including subs.
quote:

Ask yourself—if someone else did it, do you think they could do it without our detecting it? Seriously, how hard is this?
Yes. The depth is accessible to nearly all commercial equipment. For all we know this could have been an attempt to tap the pipeline gone bad.
Posted by Indefatigable
Member since Jan 2019
35696 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 11:05 am to
quote:

there just so happened to be US naval activity in the area at the time it happened.

When is the last time there wasn't "US Naval Activity" in the Baltic Sea?

This post was edited on 10/18/22 at 11:06 am
Posted by Mahootney
Lovin' My German Footprint
Member since Sep 2008
12122 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 11:09 am to
quote:

This looks more like a brittle fracture failure which isn’t dependent on age.
Lateral buckling?
Posted by Lakeboy7
New Orleans
Member since Jul 2011
28207 posts
Posted on 10/18/22 at 11:16 am to
quote:

NATO needs a purpose again


Thanks Vlad!!!!!
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram