- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:18 pm to cypresstiger
How fricking disingenuous could you (and Breitbart) possibly be?
Nearly 70% of total murders in 2017 were by gun, over 70% of those were via handgun.
Here is the actual FBI report without Breitbart's bullshite spin.
Nearly 70% of total murders in 2017 were by gun, over 70% of those were via handgun.
Here is the actual FBI report without Breitbart's bullshite spin.
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:22 pm to mmmmmbeeer
Gee I wonder what demographic carried out all those handgun murders....
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:30 pm to cypresstiger
So? More people also killed by disease. Hammers have a functional use. Certainly is no excuse not to do it we can keep some of these weapons out of the hands of lunatics.
Do what we can.
Do what we can.
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:34 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Nearly 70% of total murders in 2017 were by gun, over 70% of those were via handgun.
So, why is the left pushing for legislation eliminating certain rifles?
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:34 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
How fricking disingenuous could you (and Breitbart) possibly be?
Nearly 70% of total murders in 2017 were by gun, over 70% of those were via handgun.
They're saying that those scary rifles are responsible for a small percentage of the total gun deaths, not that guns are less dangerous than blunt objects.
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:35 pm to Hulkklogan
quote:
There's a ban hammer joke somewhere I'm this topic
quote:
Hulkklogan

Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:36 pm to upgrayedd
The moment he realizes the agenda is a crock of shite...
Ah who cares, press on!
Ah who cares, press on!
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:36 pm to Overbrook
quote:
Certainly is no excuse not to do it we can keep some of these weapons out of the hands of lunatics.
I just got a "health care professional" to brand you a lunatic and have called the police to confiscate your guns.
Now what?
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:38 pm to Deactived
quote:“I think that there's a lot of people more concerned about being precisely, factually, and semantically correct than about being morally right.”
The moment he realizes the agenda is a crock of shite...
Ah who cares, press on!
-AOC
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:39 pm to Overbrook
quote:
Hammers have a functional use
Guns don't have a functional use?
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:40 pm to upgrayedd
quote:
They're saying that those scary rifles are responsible for a small of the total gun deaths, not that guns are less dangerous than blunt objects.
There were 403 deaths by rifle.
7032 by handgun
264 by shotgun
and 3300 by guns not categorized by one of the items above. So what are those 3300? There is no note to indicate why those 3300 couldn't be classified. Are they not considering AR-15's as rifles? Who knows. The data isn't there...despite what Breitbart is trying to tell its readers.
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:40 pm to moneyg
quote:ding, ding, ding, we have a winner.
But, the emotional pull on people like you overrides that logic. And, you are a victim to that emotion.
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:43 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
Are they not considering AR-15's as rifles? Who knows.
The only person that would even question this is someone who has zero understanding of weapons classification.
AR-15s are rifles. The only person that doesn't seem to understand this is you.
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:45 pm to Centinel
quote:
The only person that would even question this is someone who has zero understanding of weapons classification.
AR-15s are rifles. The only person that doesn't seem to understand this is you.
So what kind of gun accounted for 30% of gun deaths that weren't handguns, shotguns, or rifles?
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:53 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
and 3300 by guns not categorized by one of the items above. So what are those 3300? There is no note to indicate why those 3300 couldn't be classified. Are they not considering AR-15's as rifles? Who knows. The data isn't there...despite what Breitbart is trying to tell its readers.
Ok, so if we use the 5.2% of rifle gun deaths number we get from the known deaths by rifle, we get 575 deaths by rifle (which doesn't include "assault rifles" specifically). We're going to ban "assault rifles" for 5.2% of gun deaths but handguns are just fine?
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:54 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
So what kind of gun accounted for 30% of gun deaths that weren't handguns, shotguns, or rifles?
Handguns, because statistics n shite
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:57 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
So what kind of gun accounted for 30% of gun deaths that weren't handguns, shotguns, or rifles?
The ones classified as "type not stated". Try actually reading the links you post.
Posted on 8/11/19 at 9:59 pm to Centinel
quote:
The ones classified as "type not stated". Try actually reading the links you post.
What kind of gun is not a handgun, shotgun, or rifle?
Posted on 8/11/19 at 10:02 pm to mmmmmbeeer
quote:
So what kind of gun accounted for 30% of gun deaths that weren't handguns, shotguns, or rifles?
Most people getting shot and killed are gang banging thugs. These bodies are sent to large city hospitals where bullet fragments arent analyzed to pinpoint specifics regarding type of gun. There arent enough personel and frankly, it's not worth it.
They arent going super high tech on the 500 or so bodies showing up in Chicago area hospitals riddled with bullet holes.
Popular
Back to top


0




