Started By
Message

re: FBI agent arrested for multiple sexual charges involving juveniles

Posted on 6/24/21 at 9:46 pm to
Posted by LongueCarabine
Pointe Aux Pins, LA
Member since Jan 2011
8205 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 9:46 pm to
Top Men
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
148026 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 9:47 pm to
quote:

How would it work once this guy got in jail?
will will be housed with the other pedos or in solitary
Posted by go ta hell ole miss
Member since Jan 2007
14498 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 10:18 pm to
quote:

WTF is this. Fist blasting a gator or something?


A 51 year old having sex with or attempting to have sexual acts with a child certainly qualifies IMO. You don’t agree?
This post was edited on 6/24/21 at 10:21 pm
Posted by Boo Krewe
Member since Apr 2015
9810 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 10:29 pm to
I thought FBI was best of the best ?
Posted by BuckyCheese
Member since Jan 2015
57778 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 10:36 pm to
quote:

A 51 year old having sex with or attempting to have sexual acts with a child certainly qualifies IMO. You don’t agree?


I was asking about this;
quote:

aggravated crimes against nature



That wording seems odd and is not something I have ever seen before. States have their own laws obviously, but a crime against nature doesn't sound like it's a crime against another person.

So, unwad your panties.
Posted by junkfunky
Member since Jan 2011
35699 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 10:43 pm to
That's Zappa
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
104196 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 10:44 pm to
I bet they loved busting a fed
Posted by hubertcumberdale
Member since Nov 2009
6803 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 10:44 pm to
quote:

FBI agent arrested for multiple sexual charges involving juveniles


Ironic the FBI makes all applicants take polygraph tests disclosing whether applicants have consumed drugs in the last 3 years (among other disclosures) but fail to weed out the pedophiles.
Posted by fightin tigers
Downtown Prairieville
Member since Mar 2008
76082 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 10:48 pm to
quote:

That wording seems odd and is not something I have ever seen before. States have their own laws obviously, but a crime against nature doesn't sound like it's a crime against another person.


Is incest a crime against nature?

Used to oral/anal sex was. Can still be booked on it as BRPD proved, but charges will be dropped.
Posted by Havoc
Member since Nov 2015
37390 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 10:49 pm to
And just think, they aren’t even required to tape record when questioning suspects, they just write up a report based on their recollection and that’s considered evidence. And if they say you lied, you lied.
Posted by Matt225
St. George
Member since Dec 2019
1149 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 11:12 pm to
He will never see general population.
Federal Prison's, think Gov. Edwin's time in Jail.
Posted by Jim Rockford
Member since May 2011
104196 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 11:33 pm to
quote:

89. Crime against nature

A. Crime against nature is either of the following:

(1) The unnatural carnal copulation by a human being with another of the same sex or opposite sex, except that anal sexual intercourse between two human beings shall not be deemed as a crime against nature when done under any of the circumstances described in R.S. 14:41, 42, 42.1, or 43. Emission is not necessary; and, when committed by a human being with another, the use of the genital organ of one of the offenders of whatever sex is sufficient to constitute the crime.

(2) The marriage to, or sexual intercourse with, any ascendant or descendant, brother or sister, uncle or niece, aunt or nephew, with knowledge of their relationship. The relationship must be by consanguinity, but it is immaterial whether the parties to the act are related to one another by the whole or half blood. The provisions of this Paragraph shall not apply where one person, not a resident of this state at the time of the celebration of his marriage, contracted a marriage lawful at the place of celebration and thereafter removed to this state.

B.(1) Whoever commits the offense of crime against nature as defined by Paragraph (A)(1) of this Section shall be fined not more than two thousand dollars, imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than five years, or both.

(2) Whoever commits the offense of crime against nature as defined by Paragraph (A)(1) of this Section with a person under the age of eighteen years shall be fined not more than fifty thousand dollars, imprisoned at hard labor for not less than fifteen years nor more than fifty years, or both.

(3) Whoever commits the offense of crime against nature as defined by Paragraph (A)(1) of this Section with a person under the age of fourteen years shall be fined not more than seventy-five thousand dollars, imprisoned at hard labor for not less than twenty-five years nor more than fifty years, or both.

(4) Whoever commits the offense of crime against nature as defined by Paragraph (A)(2) of this Section, where the crime is between an ascendant and descendant, or between brother and sister, shall be imprisoned at hard labor for not more than fifteen years.

(5) Whoever commits the offense of crime against nature as defined by Paragraph (A)(2) of this Section, where the crime is between uncle and niece, or aunt and nephew, shall be fined not more than one thousand dollars, or imprisoned, with or without hard labor, for not more than five years, or both.

C.(1) It shall be an affirmative defense to prosecution for a violation of Paragraph (A)(1) of this Section that, during the time of the alleged commission of the offense, the defendant was a victim of trafficking of children for sexual purposes as provided in R.S. 14:46.3(E). Any child determined to be a victim pursuant to the provisions of this Paragraph shall be eligible for specialized services for sexually exploited children.

(2) It shall be an affirmative defense to prosecution for a violation of Paragraph (A)(1) of this Section that, during the time of the alleged commission of the offense, the defendant is determined to be a victim of human trafficking pursuant to the provisions of R.S. 14:46.2(F). Any person determined to be a victim pursuant to the provisions of this Paragraph shall be notified of any treatment or specialized services for sexually exploited persons to the extent that such services are available.

D. The provisions of Act No. 177 of the 2014 Regular Session and the provisions of Act No. 602 of the 2014 Regular Session incorporate the elements of the crimes of incest (R.S. 14:78) and aggravated incest (R.S. 14:78.1), as they existed prior to their repeal by these Acts, into the provisions of the crimes of crime against nature (R.S. 14:89) and aggravated crime against nature (R.S. 14:89.1), respectively. For purposes of the provisions amended by Act No. 177 of the 2014 Regular Session and Act No. 602 of the 2014 Regular Session, a conviction for a violation of R.S. 14:89(A)(2) shall be the same as a conviction for the crime of incest (R.S. 14:78) and a conviction for a violation of R.S. 14:89.1(A)(2) shall be the same as a conviction for the crime of aggravated incest (R.S. 14:78.1). Neither Act shall be construed to alleviate any person convicted or adjudicated delinquent of incest (R.S. 14:78) or aggravated incest (R.S. 14:78.1) from any requirement, obligation, or consequence imposed by law resulting from that conviction or adjudication including but not limited to any requirements regarding sex offender registration and notification, parental rights, probation, parole, sentencing, or any other requirement, obligation, or consequence imposed by law resulting from that conviction or adjudication.

E. Nothing in Act No. 485 of the 2018 Regular Session of the Legislature shall be construed to alleviate any person convicted or adjudicated delinquent of crime against nature (R.S. 14:89) from any requirement, obligation, or consequence imposed by law resulting from that conviction or adjudication including but not limited to any requirements regarding sex offender registration and notification, parental rights, probation, parole, sentencing, or any other requirement, obligation, or consequence imposed by law resulting from that conviction or adjudication.

Amended by Acts 1975, No. 612, §1; Acts 1982, No. 703, §1; Acts 2010, No. 882, §1; Acts 2012, No. 446, §1; Acts 2013, No. 83, §1; Acts 2014, No. 177, §1; Acts 2014, No. 564, §1; Acts 2014, No. 599, §1, eff. June 12, 2014, Acts 2014, No. 602, §4, eff. June 12, 2014; Acts 2018, No. 485, §1, eff. May 25, 2018.


LINK
Posted by Gravitiger
Member since Jun 2011
12167 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 11:47 pm to
(no message)
This post was edited on 6/24/21 at 11:48 pm
Posted by Hurricane Mike
Member since Jun 2008
20059 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 11:52 pm to
quote:

with incidents occurring as far back as 2016.


Strzok was too busy framing Trump during this time period
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
15732 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 11:53 pm to
quote:

I just saw this.

Looks like he and his wife live in that Renaissance neighborhood off 73 just north of I-10. And their backyard has a direct view of St John Primary playground. My kids went there and now I'm very curious.

I wanna know if they have kids around mines' age and if they were in school and community activities together.


Couple buddies of mine live in there. They’ve met him and both said “he’s a squirrely fricker. Real strange” & “I can’t say ‘I can’t believe that’ cause something was off about that dude”

Said he has a kid that went to st. Theresa. Guessing at the same time as their kids who are now in 8th or 9th grade
Posted by Schmelly
Member since Jan 2014
15732 posts
Posted on 6/24/21 at 11:55 pm to
quote:

Now we know why the State Police were at the neighborhood in Prairieville


Yeah, they moved in on him while he was at the neighborhood pool lol
Posted by pioneerbasketball
Team Bunchie
Member since Oct 2005
139098 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 12:10 am to
quote:

He was supposedly a Federal Marshal and from Arkansas. I don’t remember his user name but it’ll come to me.

razorbroncs?
Posted by supadave3
Houston, TX
Member since Dec 2005
31739 posts
Posted on 6/25/21 at 2:15 pm to
quote:

razorbroncs


That’s him.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram