- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Father/Son dumpster shooting of neighbor murder trial. Dad GUILTY. Son NOT GUILTY
Posted on 1/27/23 at 8:04 am to LSUJCC
Posted on 1/27/23 at 8:04 am to LSUJCC
quote:
son was found not guilty
This is surprising considering the younger trash was the one who elevated the fatal situation with his yapping. He then fired shots AFTER old trash fired.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 8:09 am to MattA
quote:
Strange verdict. I would have thought they both would have walked, or both would have been found found guilty. Not a split.
Same here.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 8:12 am to MoneyTime
quote:
And although they were armed with a firearm, the deceased was also armed with a deadly weapon
Not at the onset of the confrontation.
quote:
I only know what I’ve read in the news and seen on the video, but I really thought both would walk.
That's insanity. I can understand why the son walked on a murder charge, as he did not shoot until after the violence started. The dad shot before the bat was thrown at him. There is no defending that, especially considering the dead guy was unarmed when the fatties rolled up with guns in their hands.
Had the fatties had their guns holstered, I would have a much different opinion.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 8:14 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 8:38 am to MoneyTime
quote:
the son who was toting the sawed off shotgun
I don't think it was a sawed off shotgun, but a gauge pump shotgun (like a 14").
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 8:40 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 8:42 am to cyogi
Mossberg shockwave I think, completely legal and not “sawed-off”.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 8:43 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 8:53 am to The Boat
quote:I agree. Now everyone will forget what a great dad and citizen he was.
Guy is in his 70s. Seems crazy to live your whole life and catch a murder charge right at the frickin end so that’s all anyone will remember you by.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:22 am to mmcgrath
Shocking that people thought these two would both get off with nothing. They approached someone with guns drawn for dumping trash in an alley and kept dating him to make a move while talking shite. All three are garbage and the only way this story could’ve ended better is if the son also got locked away for life. 2 out of 3 ain’t bad though I guess
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:44 am to LNCHBOX
quote:what a frick head.... go back and read what i said... i said by the law he is not guilty but would not be surprised if he was found guilty.... So im 2 for 2 here. Its crazy how incompetent you are on so many issues.
Can't believe y'all thought that fat frick instigating a confrontation with a gun in his hand was gonna walk on this
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:46 am to CarRamrod
quote:
i said by the law he is not guilty but would not be surprised if he was found guilty.... So im 2 for 2 here. Its crazy how incompetent you are on so many issues.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:46 am to jrodLSUke
quote:whats the texas law on that? i know the louisian law revolves around fear of loss of life, but not sure Texas's is. I think Texas's is similar to Florida.
Hard to claim you were in fear of great bodily harm if you are encouraging escalation of the encounter.
And really with the split decision, seems an appeal would be easy here.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:47 am to LNCHBOX
quote:your comments insinuate you dont.
Nah, you said I don't believe in freedom
quote:this does not constitute murder.
started a confrontation with his finger on the trigger against an unarmed man.
quote:I called exactly what happened, how was i wrong?
You were wrong and you're too stubborn to admit it.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 9:48 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:48 am to CarRamrod
quote:
your comments insinuate you dont.
If your idea of freedom is to be able to start a confrontation against an unarmed man with a gun in your hand then try to claim self defense, yea I don't believe in that.
quote:
this does not constitute murder.
Yea, the murder he committed constitutes murder.
quote:
I called exactly what happened, how was i wrong?
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 9:50 am
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:54 am to LNCHBOX
quote:you retard... you said he is guilty because he could have walked away... Someone does not have to walk away. So yea your comment was against the guys freedom being there.
your idea of freedom is to be able to start a confrontation against an unarmed man with a gun in your hand then try to claim self defense, yea I don't believe in that.
quote:
You claimed both outcomes that were possible. Really going out on a limb there.,
This is what i said
quote:
I think they still we be found guilty on something just because this day and age, and how the public.... people like you cant see beyond the trashiness.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:55 am to CarRamrod
quote:
you said he is guilty because he could have walked away.
I said he was guilty for more reasons than that. frick off with your bullshite.
quote:
I think they still we be found guilty on something just because this day and age, and how the public.... people like you cant see beyond the trashiness.
He was found guilty because he broke the fricking law. If he was only convicted for being trashy, how did his son not catch that same conviction?
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:57 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
I said he was guilty for more reasons than that. frick off with your bullshite.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:58 am to CarRamrod
Yea, I'd just post emojis too. You look like a retard here trying to call me out.
From back on page 2:
Tell me what freedom I don't believe in for having this take.
From back on page 2:
quote:
Fatdad shot before the baseball bat was thrown. He's guilty of something.
Tell me what freedom I don't believe in for having this take.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:59 am to CarRamrod
quote:
you said he is guilty because he could have walked away... Someone does not have to walk away. So yea your comment was against the guys freedom being there.
Have you read the relevant statutes?
Posted on 1/27/23 at 9:59 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
The dad shot before the bat was thrown at him.
How do you know that? It's not on the video.
Posted on 1/27/23 at 10:01 am to CocomoLSU
quote:
How do you know that? It's not on the video.
You should get your eyes checked. It 100% is.
fricking love all the downvotes I've gotten in this thread.
This post was edited on 1/27/23 at 10:03 am
Popular
Back to top


0





