- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Elon looking to take out Wikipedia with Grokipedia
Posted on 10/1/25 at 5:43 am to ATrillionaire
Posted on 10/1/25 at 5:43 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
I have good news. If you find an article that doesn't match your bias, you can edit it. Try it out.
You can also poor water out of a sinking boat a bucket at a time. Or you can just get on a different boat.
All great options.
0
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:07 am to Riggle
Wikipedia has been shown, not just accused but actually shown, via the curtain being pulled back on how moderation/editing occurs, to be very leftwing in their editorial bias.
The fact that this very leftwing bias is then used as the basis for AI answers and populates at the top of Google searches, whose algorithm also produces demonstrated leftwing leftwing bias in its search results, means that for most people, simple internet use is actually an engagement with progressive/leftist propaganda.
They've had other wikipedia type sources out there. For this Grokipedia to work they need to figure a way to get that site used as the basis for AI/Google generated searches. That's going to be the hard part in this scheme.
The fact that this very leftwing bias is then used as the basis for AI answers and populates at the top of Google searches, whose algorithm also produces demonstrated leftwing leftwing bias in its search results, means that for most people, simple internet use is actually an engagement with progressive/leftist propaganda.
They've had other wikipedia type sources out there. For this Grokipedia to work they need to figure a way to get that site used as the basis for AI/Google generated searches. That's going to be the hard part in this scheme.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 6:11 am to StansberryRules
quote:
THe early iterations of the articles were way more neutral, it has veered left wing big time over time.
Well yeah, democracy is at stake people!!!
Posted on 10/1/25 at 7:16 am to hawgfaninc
Elon is in the epstein files. You guys were all against pedophiles until you learned your servants were in them. Wake up
Posted on 10/1/25 at 7:28 am to YNWA
quote:
Elon is in the epstein files. You guys were all against pedophiles until you learned your servants were in them. Wake up
Trump is in the Epstein files too, and no one is claiming he did anything wrong. Dude hung out with the rich and powerful. Not everyone knew what he was doing.
The fact that Peter Thiel was mentioned in that release by Congressional Dems should have made it clear to you that it was a huge nothingburger.
This post was edited on 10/1/25 at 7:30 am
Posted on 10/1/25 at 7:47 am to c on z
quote:
quote: Conservatives are often described as "far right" and "conspiracy theorist" gets thrown out alot Well…are they lying?
Yes
Posted on 10/1/25 at 7:59 am to YNWA
And Clinton was with the young girls via some first hand witness accts.
Where is your outrage during the last admin?
Where is your outrage during the last admin?
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:00 am to StansberryRules
quote:
Anything with subjective opinion or political overtones, it's absolutely awfu
So he just wants different opinions that he deems is correct?
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:01 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
I have good news. If you find an article that doesn't match your bias, you can edit it. Try it out.
WHat do the frickers that work there do when that happens and they don't like it?
Posted on 10/1/25 at 8:11 am to barry
quote:
So he just wants different opinions that he deems is correct?
Maybe so. But at any rate the left wing bias is not really debatable. Treating MSNBC and CNN as “reliable sources” is insane.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:21 am to N2cars
quote:
Really?
You can do a general google search to find out how many academics have issues with the wiki pages about themselves. And when they report it, to publish the truth, it never gets fixed.
I'll say I don't think its just left leaning but also a suppression of medical research which I see as a problem on both sides of the aisle because of the $ involved.
Posted on 10/1/25 at 9:33 am to ATrillionaire
quote:
I have good news. If you find an article that doesn't match your bias, you can edit it. Try it out.
Try editing anything controversial, they're locked.
For example, the Nashville trans terrorist article uses preferred pronouns. For a terrorist. Who slaughtered children.
Page 4 of 4
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News