Started By
Message
locked post

Economy v. Lives Debate

Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:09 pm
Posted by rpr4695
Member since May 2013
2132 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:09 pm
It's strange how some have castigated those who want the economy to open up by labeling them as callous people who only care about the money vs. lives. They really don't understand how debilitating being unemployed and in poverty can be.

Also strange how some of those people a few months ago were preaching to us about a "living wage."
Posted by Ronaldo Burgundiaz
NWA
Member since Jan 2012
6795 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:12 pm to
Those who live in their mom's basement dont care about unemployment. Its easy for them to be generous with other people's jobs when mom makes meatloaf!
Posted by cable
Member since Oct 2018
9735 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:14 pm to
pretty simple - you can choose to stay locked inside your home, if you don't have a job you can't choose to not pay your mortgage. Economy wins 1st rd knockout.
Posted by BigPerm30
Member since Aug 2011
32446 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:14 pm to
You’re a dick for wanting to provide for your family when 87 year old aunt Betty who weighs in at 316 and smokes 2 packs a day may die. You inconsiderate a-hole.
Posted by PrivatePublic
Member since Nov 2012
17848 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:14 pm to
This thread should finally settle it.
Posted by wdhalgren
Member since May 2013
5704 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:17 pm to
It's not an either/or debate. The normal functioning of our healthcare system has been severely impaired by this shutdown. The cost in lives due to that is mounting right now and will eventually pass the virus toll if this continues.

Plus, people are apparently oblivious to how vulnerable our debt ridden economy is to an economic shutdown. Printing money may seem like a painless solution to every economic disruption, but that's the furthest thing from the truth.
This post was edited on 5/2/20 at 8:19 pm
Posted by Walking the Earth
Member since Feb 2013
17469 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:19 pm to
quote:

Also strange how some of those people a few months ago were preaching to us about a "living wage."


It's easy to care about lives at the expense of the economy when the federal and state governments are paying people 800 dollars plus a week to stay home. That's equal to or greater than most people make at their shitty jobs that they absolutely despise.

We'll see how long that altruism holds when Uncle Sam says "Sorry...money all gone" and drops everybody head first into a high unemployment environment.
Posted by rpr4695
Member since May 2013
2132 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:20 pm to
quote:

It's not an either/or debate. The normal functioning of our healthcare system has been severely impaired by this shutdown. The cost in lives due to that is mounting right now and will eventually pass the virus toll if this shutdown continues.



I understand that was the original concern behind flattening the curve, but I haven't seen a single source which has said the virus has pushed our healthcare system past its capacity. Additionally, now some have reasoned that the quarantine orders are for saving as many lives possible. That was never the original reason behind flattening the curve.
Posted by armsdealer
Member since Feb 2016
12337 posts
Posted on 5/2/20 at 8:28 pm to
They are not even bothering to print money anymore, they just add some zeros in the computer.

What, the CDC adjusted the death toll to 11,XXX people... .03% of the US population has gotten sick.

There should be no debates, open it up.
Posted by MSUDawg98
Bear the F Down
Member since Jan 2018
14173 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 2:44 am to
It's a false choice. The careful balance comes with working better protected and minimizing interactions. I'm glad Trump has brought Mark Cuban into his economic taskforce. Cuban is 100% on point with smart ways to create jobs and grow out of this debt. (If not for his anti-2A position I'd probably vote for him.)

Good things came out of the 1st Great Depression, there's no reason why we can't do the same with projects to improve old school infrastructure. That along with things like expanding fiber so everyone has access to high speed internet is a smart way to put people to work. (Wouldn't mind seeing private companies put out of the business and it being a municipal bill ala water & sewage billing.) And if they're going to up the fed minimum wage they need to mandate disability policies and social security pay based on at least that $31,200 yearly minimum wage. (LTD currently pays less than the current unemployment checks I've seen people bitch about on TV...usually look a lot like those waiting in the weed line every Friday.)

This is also the time to look at reverting back to isolationism. The Chinese should not have us by the balls when it comes to something as important as medication. Hit reset and think big rather than just throwing money hoping our idiocracy will figure it out by just throwing money at the problem.
Posted by Icansee4miles
Trolling the Tickfaw
Member since Jan 2007
32333 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 6:41 am to
There’s not nearly as many basement dwellers crying about this as front porch sitters. Lawsey it sho is hot hope my gubberment check gets here soon.

We are into a third generation of Lyndon Johnson created dependents of the Federal government. They DGAF about the economy and “their people” are dying in disproportionate numbers from this racist attack. They are also the ones all the blue governors are counting on for support.
Posted by Cracker
in a box
Member since Nov 2009
19320 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 8:18 am to
Utilitarianism
Posted by eitek1
Member since Jun 2011
2910 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 8:33 am to
At the end of the day folks don’t realize it doesn’t matter.

Folks have three options. Contract it and get better, contract it and die or wait for a vaccine. That’s it, there are no more moves.

If a vaccine is a year away waiting for it isn’t really a possibility. Is there some option these folks are aware of that I’m missing?

Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
98830 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 8:39 am to
quote:

I'm glad Trump has brought Mark Cuban into his economic taskforce.


Yea I’m sure Trump is going to heed the advice of a dbag who just recently said he may run against Trump. Dude can’t even sustain the Mavs as a powerhouse, yet he should control economic policy?

lol
Posted by waiting4saturday
Covington, LA
Member since Sep 2005
11159 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:24 am to
quote:


It's strange how some have castigated those who want the economy to open up by labeling them as callous people who only care about the money vs. lives.


What I’ve seen is it’s usually the 60+ retirees who don’t worry about a paycheck or your typical government worker who also doesn’t worry about a paycheck.
Posted by Athos
Member since Sep 2016
11878 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:26 am to
quote:

This is also the time to look at reverting back to isolationism


Isolationism in a globalist economy?
Posted by Pussykat
South Louisiana
Member since Oct 2016
3889 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:29 am to
quote:

We'll see how long that altruism holds when Uncle Sam says "Sorry...money all gone" and drops everybody head first into a high unemployment environment.



To take it a step further, when it comes time when people have to go back to work, those employers/jobs need to be there.
Posted by Darth_Vader
A galaxy far, far away
Member since Dec 2011
74667 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:39 am to
quote:

This is also the time to look at reverting back to isolationism


Isolationism in a globalist economy?


I don’t think we need to revert to isolationism. But we need to take a serious look at how reliant we’ve become on imports, especially from China.
Posted by Rouge
Floston Paradise
Member since Oct 2004
138865 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:41 am to
quote:

rpr4695


The bigger issue is the growing number that are going out and don't give a shite about anyone else

A growing selfish society
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
46755 posts
Posted on 5/3/20 at 9:46 am to
quote:

A growing selfish society


The selfish part of our society are the ones who currently have a job, no fear of losing that job, and want us to remain locked down because they aren't personally affected.

first pageprev pagePage 1 of 2Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram