- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:39 pm to dj30
quote:
Really dude? This is pretty pathetic.
I agree.. completely pathetic that he won't engage in conversation with people who don't blindly follow his rhetoric
frick you darryl
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:39 pm to ell_13
I hope this is proven false and Judge can sue her for future wages if any are ever earned.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:40 pm to dj30
in a very blunt way, i think he's making a "due process" argument
a big issue with progressives is their attack on due process. BLM's attack is on the DP of police accused of wrongdoing
a big issue with progressives is their attack on due process. BLM's attack is on the DP of police accused of wrongdoing
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:40 pm to ell_13
quote:
I know JR from HS
did we go to HS together brah?
eta: I'm not JR but that's where I know him from
This post was edited on 2/14/17 at 1:44 pm
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:41 pm to dj30
quote:Attacking how? She made a public accusation and seems to be looking to move forward with some type of plan based on that accusation. I'm not sure what it is, but she has a lawyer for a reason, no? The "attacks" I saw were in regard to her past which, of course, are relevant if a case were brought forward.
My issue the entire time was you guys attacking that women.
quote:I think it's obvious most of us were expecting no evidence to support her. But again, she has a lawyer for a reason IMO.
Actions regarding what? Its a he said, she said situation. I hope yall weren't expecting to find evidence or something.
quote:I don't get why people do it either, but they certainly do. You were shown examples earlier.
I don't see a reason why someone would make something like this up
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:41 pm to dj30
quote:
darryljames30
White man hiding his bigotry behind a screen name
This post was edited on 2/14/17 at 1:42 pm
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:41 pm to dj30
quote:
on't see a reason why someone would make something like this up, but obviously you guys feel different.
You got your shite pushed in on this yesterday. Do we need to start posting links to fake hate crimes again for you?
Jesus you're dense af
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:41 pm to terd ferguson
Ask Gary why isnt any of his businesses that he owns in good stading with the Secratary of States Office?
quote:
THE ROUGE COLLECTION LLC
Annual Report Status: Not In Good Standing for failure to file Annual Report
quote:
CHRIST IS KING PRODUCTIONS INC.
Status: Inactive
Inactive Reason:
Action by Secretary of State
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:41 pm to terd ferguson
quote:
He will stick with "Isn't it funny that the witness changed his story? I told y'all people was getting paid for silence".
very close
quote:
1. Man says he heard the judge call the woman a racial slur.
2. Another deputy talks to the man later, the man says he didn't say that.
3. The mans name is kept from the report.
The report says that a deputy working at Sammy's Grill on the night of the incident, Feb. 3, noted that a male patron told him the judge directed "racial language" toward the patron. But in a follow-up conversation with another deputy, the man — whose name is redacted from the report — denied ever making those comments to the original investigating deputies.
This big hick town is something else.
The man heard it. Changed his story. They keep his name out of the report. So who called this man and gave him a few dollars or a new job to be silent?
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:42 pm to BilJ
I called it!
Fat Gary is so predictable...
quote:
1. Man says he heard the judge call the woman a racial slur.
2. Another deputy talks to the man later, the man says he didn't say that.
3. The mans name is kept from the report.
The report says that a deputy working at Sammy's Grill on the night of the incident, Feb. 3, noted that a male patron told him the judge directed "racial language" toward the patron. But in a follow-up conversation with another deputy, the man — whose name is redacted from the report — denied ever making those comments to the original investigating deputies.
This big hick town is something else.
The man heard it. Changed his story. They keep his name out of the report. So who called this man and gave him a few dollars or a new job to be silent?
Fat Gary is so predictable...
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
very close
C'mon... it's better than very close, brah.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:43 pm to tgrbaitn08
quote:
Ask Gary why isnt any of his businesses that he owns in good stading with the Secratary of States Office?
may he's probably just late filing his annual renewal shite. it's not a big deal
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:43 pm to Mr. Hangover
quote:
frick you darryl
Grow up dude. I'm not the one going around making fake facebook profiles to write on peoples walls. Hopefully you're still a teenager or something. One of these days, you can become a man and hopefully become a productive member of the society.
This post was edited on 2/14/17 at 1:52 pm
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:43 pm to SlowFlowPro
We knew terd would be right, Slow. Just a matter of time.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:43 pm to meauxjeaux2
quote:
think that's Terd
Nope
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:43 pm to terd ferguson
you did not include a description of BR as a "hick town" brah. 1 point deduction from your score
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:43 pm to dj30
quote:
My issue the entire time was you guys attacking that women
But you had no problem with this woman making unsubstantiated rumors about the judge??
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:44 pm to Janky
quote:
I hope this is proven false and Judge can sue her for future wages if any are ever earned.
She owes restitution for stealing $75k from her former employer. Before, that wasn't common knowledge, unless you did a background check (which many food industry places don't), so she could've worked in the food industry.
But where's she going to work now? Everyone in BR knows about her past now. She's basically unemployable unless The Rouge Collection wants to hire her. Sammy's probably doesn't.
Posted on 2/14/17 at 1:44 pm to SlowFlowPro
quote:
may he's probably just late filing his annual renewal shite. it's not a big deal
almost 1 year late??
quote:
Last Report Filed: 4/25/2016
Popular
Back to top


2






