Started By
Message

re: EBR Library fires employee for failing to address coworker

Posted on 7/16/25 at 1:16 pm to
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35741 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 1:16 pm to
quote:

a story where progressives have bastardized the english language to the point it is unrecognizable. Then again, the idiot journalist is very likely to be on the side of the fascist.


Hmmmm...where have we heard of this tactic before?

Oh yeah...

quote:

In George Orwell's 1984, the purpose of Newspeak was to limit the range of thought by reducing and controlling language. It was a key tool of the totalitarian regime (the Party) to maintain power and suppress dissent.

Here’s how it worked and why it mattered:

1. Eliminating Unorthodox Ideas
Newspeak was designed to make "thoughtcrime" impossible. If there are no words to express rebellion, freedom, or truth, then people can't even think those concepts clearly.

Example: Instead of “bad,” Newspeak uses “ungood.” This removes nuance and prevents independent thought.
2. Narrowing Thought
By systematically reducing vocabulary and grammar, Newspeak narrows the range of possible thought—what Orwell called “thought control through language.” Complex ideas become inexpressible, and subtle or critical thinking becomes harder.

3. Rewriting Reality
The Party uses Newspeak to reshape the past and present. As the language evolves, older texts become unintelligible, erasing historical memory and making it easier to manipulate the truth.


It's actually shocking how much this aligns with modern progressivism.
Posted by bbap
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2006
96839 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 1:18 pm to
Gender is a social construct!!!!!!arrrrgh.


Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35741 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 1:22 pm to
So is raceder. I'm black.

ETA: today
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 1:23 pm
Posted by SuperSaint
Sorting Out OT BS Since '2007'
Member since Sep 2007
147980 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 1:27 pm to
quote:

Why is it weird for a man to wear a dress? I


Because mental illness isn’t something to be proud of.




Stay away from my kids and anywhere we frequent please.
Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
13184 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 1:46 pm to
quote:

Why is it weird to make fun of a man in dress and heels?



It is not. It is actually pretty universally funny. It has been for a long time. I saw a YouTube clip of Flip Wilson doing Geraldine just a few days ago....in the early 70s on prime-time network TV....a pretty popular show at the time. Drag shows ARE comedy. That is the foundational point, always has been, always will be. If someone goes to see a drag show to be titillated sexually or finds it sexually repulsive THEY have some issues, not the drag queen. Being mean spirited about it is just that, mean. Making fun of a man in a dress in the spirit of comedy and good will is fine, making fun of a man in a dress to degrade and humiliate them is just mean.

Posted by AwgustaDawg
CSRA
Member since Jan 2023
13184 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 1:53 pm to
quote:


Because mental illness isn’t something to be proud of.


Cancer is an illness of an organ in exactly the same manner mental illness is an illness of an organ. It is also not something to be proud of but it is also not something to be ashamed of....people get sick, it happens.

quote:

Stay away from my kids and anywhere we frequent please.


With all due respect I want nothing to do with your kids my friend. I am certain they are delightful but they ain't mine....but if you do not want them to see a man in a dress it is incumbent upon you to keep them away from likely places where that may happen, like public places. Or you could just treat that man like you would anyone else...either way its your choice, it ain't incumbent on the man in the dress to avoid your kids in public.

Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35741 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 2:06 pm to
quote:

If someone goes to see a drag show to be titillated sexually or finds it sexually repulsive THEY have some issues, not the drag queen.


Quoting this for posterity so you can't go back and edit.

The first part is in my humble opinion disgusting (but if you're into that thing, hey, go for it) and the second part is telling about you and your beliefs.

And also stop trying to equate a guy who dresses up as a woman to entertain with a guy who believes they are a woman and expects the rest of society to bend to their delusions. It's disingenuous and they are nowhere NEAR the same thing.
This post was edited on 7/16/25 at 2:08 pm
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35741 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 2:09 pm to
quote:

Cancer is an illness of an organ in exactly the same manner mental illness is an illness of an organ. It is also not something to be proud of but it is also not something to be ashamed of....people get sick, it happens.


But in your world, we would go along with the delusions of the bulimic and all agree that they are in fact, fat, and should lose some weight.
Posted by gillian
Member since May 2017
304 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:10 pm to
Can these people read the room? This is not the city or state in which to fire someone for refusing to use preferred pronouns. Indeed, the library has just bought itself a heap of trouble in a city and state that will not tolerate violations of religious beliefs like this. There will be hell to pay with library funding, and I expect to see other political actions taken to prevent this kind of activity from taking place in the future.

The people in library leadership who are responsible for this should be reprimanded for violating the religious rights of their employees. If you are going to have a work place "in which all employees are welcomed, accepted and respected," you must accept these kinds of differences and, well, welcome, accept, and respect those with a different viewpoint on this matter. As is, being welcomed, accepted, and respected goes only one way.
Posted by BHS78
Member since May 2017
3379 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:16 pm to
You got me, next time I submit a term paper I will be sure to proofread it before submitting.
Posted by Chucktown_Badger
The banks of the Ashley River
Member since May 2013
35741 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:20 pm to
quote:

those with a different viewpoint on this matter.


I mean, there's not really a differing viewpoint to have...it was a dude, than can be proven beyond a reasonable doubt if necessary and as far as I know facts and the truth are legitimate defenses.
Posted by Bard
Definitely NOT an admin
Member since Oct 2008
57732 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 3:28 pm to
quote:

Biology is an undeniable scientific fact and can be tested for simply....there is no such test for gender.


Wrong. "Gender" comes to us through the French gendre (son-in-law), originating from the Latin genus which means "class", "type", or "sort".

For pretty much the history of the English language it's been synonymous with "biological sex", especially in formal or medical contexts.

quote:

Gender is a social construct by ANY definition.


Wrong again. It wasn't until the 1950s when Dr. John Money decided that "gender" should mean "societally assigned roles". He sought out to prove his theory by experimenting on twins Brian and David Reimer.

The short version of this sad and tragic tale is that Dr. Money talked David's parents into convincing him that he was a girl after a botched circumcision mutilated his penis. The result? Brian OD'd and David killed himself, the roots of both deaths planted firmly in what was essentially the psychological warfare waged on them (but especially David) by their parents and Money just so Money could prove his insane theory.

The very foundation, the legacy, of this ridiculous stance that "gender" is somehow a sliding scale of "what I want people to think I am" is based in those being subjected to it killing themselves over their involvement with it.

And you're supporting that.

quote:

I can not imagine willfully referring to someone who identifies as a man as she or her or being overly put out when that man corrected me.


Then you are a push-over. Be sure to tell each "gender" emperor you meet how fabulous their clothes are.

This post was edited on 7/17/25 at 8:16 am
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
2164 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:19 pm to
quote:

It's actually shocking how much this aligns with modern progressivism.


Not if you have been paying attention to their actions the past 30 years or so.

They are the true fascists, then project their actions unto their enemy.
Posted by SludgeFactory
Middle of Nowhere
Member since Jun 2025
2164 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:32 pm to
quote:

But in your world, we would go along with the delusions of the bulimic and all agree that they are in fact, fat, and should lose some weight.


That poster is a straight up lunatic.

Wrote several novels to defend mental illness, then actually used cancer as a comparison. Holy shite I've seen it all.

Amazing. So if I don't recognize someone having cancer, I can lose my job too?

What a retard
Posted by jrobic4
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2011
11898 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:34 pm to
quote:

Logan Wolf, a board member at Forum for Equality,


I'd say Logan could suck my dick, but it actually would, so...
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
13399 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 4:49 pm to
Cry about it, pussy


Nobody gives a shite about the freaks anymore. Common sense is starting to come back into the fold
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
49586 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 5:20 pm to
quote:

The difference is, one side can lose their livelihood if they don’t play along


I get it and get the post above.

My point is just that it is absurd that we have to play this game with a few of the actual “trans” when from what I can tell a lot of them don’t give a shite and just want to be left alone.

It’s like the extreme gay person making demands. We all know gay people that just want to go to work and live but a small percentage blow up shite. Or the white liberal woman. Lord that’s the worst.

If everyone would just mind their own fricking business and not be so quick to be offended we would be a lot better off.

If I’m asked to use pronouns I’ll decline.


Posted by fallguy_1978
Best States #50
Member since Feb 2018
52930 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 5:33 pm to
I seriously doubt my company would hire someone that used different pronouns. That shite would never fly
Posted by TheRouxGuru
Member since Nov 2019
13399 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 5:55 pm to
quote:

from what I can tell a lot of them don’t give a shite and just want to be left alone.


How many actual trans people do you know ya queef?
Posted by Martini
Near Athens
Member since Mar 2005
49586 posts
Posted on 7/16/25 at 7:22 pm to
quote:

How many actual trans people do you know ya queef?


Actually 3 through business. I mean nice gals and they do a lot monetarily so who cares?

One I’ve known for 40 years when he was just deciding to cross over the bridge. Engineer, smart as hell, business owner in Louisiana and we do about $1m a year together for last 20 or so years. We all knew and I don’t look at it any differently than gay people I know in business.

Smart people who you can work with throughout your career which is beneficial for all parties are hard to find. Better than dealing with a bunch of dumbasses which there are plenty.
first pageprev pagePage 5 of 6Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram