- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
1
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:03 pm to Golfer
In so many words, yes, it is.
We both know that had this guy been a professional about this matter, not to mention sober, he would not have been charged.
We both know that had this guy been a professional about this matter, not to mention sober, he would not have been charged.
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 3:11 pm
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:03 pm to theenemy
quote:
On a traffic stop, an officer can instruct a person to stay back. At that point it is an investigation.
The individual has a right to an attorney to be present.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:03 pm to CottonWasKing
I hate BRPD. This wouldn't happen in the city of St. George.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:05 pm to The People
quote:
In some many words, yes, it is. We both know that had this guy been a professional about this matter, not to mention sober, he would not have been charged.
Because cops are professional.
That explains the one cursing at me last time I dealt with one when I was sober and replying politely.
And can y'all go arrest one of my old bosses? Grade-A a-hole.
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:05 pm to oVo
It is a different culture up here, you do get some ahole cops like I encountered down south in college. But most cops up here don't view defense lawyers as bad people to be fricked with, they just view them as people doing their job and they don't take it personally. A few do, but not most.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:06 pm to tigercraig
Damn, I know Jarrett. I hope he beats this bullshite.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:07 pm to Golfer
quote:
The individual has a right to an attorney to be present.
Wrong!
If a person invokes their right to counsel, the police cannot question them without the counsel is present.
It doesn't mean the attorney automatcically gets to come into the scene or speak with his/her client at that moment.
It just ends questioning until the cops choose to interview the suspect with the attorney present.
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:10 pm to tigercraig
police love that "interfereing with an Officer" BS.
I got it at a Saints game one time. A cop grabs a friend of mine and throws him against the wall. I talk to the officer calmly and explain my friend was drunk. Somehow I end up in the Superdome jail and they made the court date the very next day and I had an exam.
So I skipped the court date.
Bench warrant doesn't show in system. I had two LEO buddies check.
I got it at a Saints game one time. A cop grabs a friend of mine and throws him against the wall. I talk to the officer calmly and explain my friend was drunk. Somehow I end up in the Superdome jail and they made the court date the very next day and I had an exam.
So I skipped the court date.
Bench warrant doesn't show in system. I had two LEO buddies check.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:11 pm to theenemy
How is getting out of a vehicle and talking to your friend a crime exactly?
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:12 pm to theenemy
quote:
quote: The individual has a right to an attorney to be present. Wrong! If a person invokes their right to counsel, the police cannot question them without the counsel present. It doesn't mean the attorney automatcically gets to come into the scene or speak with his/her client at that moment. It just ends questioning until the cops choose to interview the suspect with the attorney present.
CORRECT... The lawyer cannot interfere with the investigation, especially on the roadside
Not to mention he was intoxicated, hardly think that a lawyer , doctor would act in a professional capacity while drunk and that be acceptable. Maybe if the situation was life or death, but not in this case
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:14 pm to Golfer
pretty sure I have seen the cop that arrested him before in dwi stories. I want to say he had the most one year, so not surprised he would do something like this
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:15 pm to heartbreakTiger
quote:
pretty sure I have seen the cop that arrested him before in dwi stories. I want to say he had the most one year, so not surprised he would do something like this
The cop is butthurt that the attorney has been trying to frick with his quota.
This post was edited on 3/22/14 at 3:16 pm
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:16 pm to monsterballads
quote:
How is getting out of a vehicle and talking to your friend a crime exactly?
Because a cop is given the authority to control the scene for safety reasons.
Getting out of the car, causes the cop to have to stop his investigation and deal with the passenger, which is also a safety concern.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:16 pm to tigerpimpbot
That's all this is about
Affecting revenue
Affecting revenue
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:17 pm to rebelJCL
quote:
CORRECT... The lawyer cannot interfere with the investigation, especially on the roadside
I'm pretty sure an attorney can invoke his client's right to counsel for them. But then again I didn't go to law school.
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:17 pm to monsterballads
It's not...UNLESS, the police are doing their jobs and conducting an investigation. And passengers getting out of a vehicle during a traffic stop other than being asked to by an officer, is interfering
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:17 pm to theenemy
quote:
Because a cop is given the authority to control the scene for safety reasons.
So getting out if a car and talking to your friend is a crime? Can you show me where that is?
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:18 pm to rebelJCL
Is flashing your lights at cars for them to slow down interfering when a cop is shooting radar?
Posted on 3/22/14 at 3:19 pm to monsterballads
quote:
Can you show me where that is?
quote:
329. Interfering with a law enforcement investigation
A. Interfering with a law enforcement investigation is the intentional interference or obstruction of a law enforcement officer conducting investigative work at the scene of a crime or the scene of an accident by refusing to move or leave the immediate scene of the crime or the accident when ordered to do so by the law enforcement officer when the offender has reasonable grounds to believe the officer is acting in the performance of his official duties.
Page 2 of 18
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News