- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Dr. Catherine O'Neal :"If you don't choose the vaccine, you're choosing death"
Posted on 7/16/21 at 7:45 pm to NoSaint
Posted on 7/16/21 at 7:45 pm to NoSaint
quote:
So it’s a weird standard to apply to the discussion.
That's because you don't seem to have a f'cking clue as to the nature of the discussion as per the title of the thread and the "doctor's" misguided quote.
0
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:05 pm to AlabamasSalaryCap
Over a year of full blown global Covid and I know OF one person who died with it. And she was old and unhealthy AF.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:06 pm to Aubie Spr96
Great pick! Do not listen to these people
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:11 pm to AlabamasSalaryCap
quote:
I don't pretend to know the reason just yet.
$$$$
Control
MDs outsource critical thinking to centralized guidelines from authorities
Most MDs are overwhelmed, burnout, and in personal survival mode (in large part to centralized medical records...)
Control the authorities, control information and practice patterns
Current control is to push biotech
Indulge me:
Bill Gates
quote:
The organization — which carries out systematic reviews of health-care interventions — told Nature it had received “numerous complaints” about Gøtzsche after the publication earlier this year of a critique he co-authored, entitled ‘The Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias’ and published in the BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.
https://www.bmj.com/content/362/bmj.k3472/rr-4
quote:
HPV vaccine safety: Cochrane launches urgent investigation into review after criticisms BMJ 2018; 362 doi: LINK (Published 09 August 2018) Cite this as: BMJ 2018;362:k3472
quote:
Rapid Response: Cochrane HPV vaccine review severely compromised by conflicts of interest The recently published Cochrane HPV vaccine review[1] is severely compromised and cannot be trusted due to the conflicts of interest of authors on the original protocol and the final review document. Due to serious conflicts of interests, Cochrane should withdraw this review.
In February 2016, I challenged David Tovey, Editor in Chief of Cochrane, directly about protocol author Lauri Markowitz's conflicts of interest. Catherine Riva et al raised the problem of conflicts of interest in December 2014 in a comment on the original protocol[2], specifically pointing out the failure to properly disclose conflicts of interest by Lauri Markowitz and Marc Arbyn. Arbyn remained an author throughout all stages. Lauri Markowitz is an employee of the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), and is involved in HPV vaccination promotion. The US Government benefits from the sale of HPV vaccine products, i.e. a letter to Dr Eric Suba from the US National Archives and Records Administration (November 2010) discusses royalties the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) receives from the sales of HPV vaccines. (See a copy of the letter via this link: LINK Indicating a stunning lack of transparency, it appears the value of these royalties is kept secret, i.e. it is protected from disclosure under the US Freedom of Information Act. The NIH Office of Technology Transfer (OTT) oversaw the patenting of the HPV vaccine technology and licensed the technology to Merck, the maker of Gardasil, which sought approval for Gardasil around the world, working with the PATH group, with support from the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, in distributing the HPV vaccine in developing countries.[3] The HPV vaccine technology was also licensed to GlaxoSmithKline[4]. The Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation has been very influential in promoting HPV vaccination[5]. In regards to the Cochrane HPV vaccine review, Cochrane has a conflict of interest in that it is a beneficiary of Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation funding, i.e. to "support the development of Cochrane's next generation evidence system, with a specific focus on maternal and child health".[6] The World Mercury Project has provided critical analysis of Cochrane's conflicts of interest via the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation and other organisations[7]. As a matter of urgency, Cochrane needs to consider conflicts of interest in its undertakings, as these are compromising Cochrane's mission to provide credible and unbiased information to support informed health decision-making.
Guess who is one of the biggest funders of Cochrane...
Truth as we see it fit
Nothing to see here. Move along and take your meds (or shots...)
TOP DOWN CONTROL
https://www.tigerdroppings.com/rant/politics/nature-cochrane-collaboration-evidence-based-rife-with-top-down-authoritarian-culture/78992762/
quote:
Nature: Cochrane Collaboration (evidence-based) rife with "top-down authoritarian culture"
Posted on 9/25/18 at 8:35 am
https://www.nature.com/articles/d41586-018-06727-0
quote:
NEWS 17 SEPTEMBER 2018
UPDATE 17 SEPTEMBER 2018 CORRECTION 19 SEPTEMBER 2018
Mass resignation guts board of prestigious Cochrane Collaboration
Governing board of the evidence-based medicine group may now be dissolved entirely.
quote:
The board of the Cochrane Collaboration, a prestigious group that reviews health evidence, has been reduced from 13 to 6 members, following a controversial vote to expel a member for the first time in its 25-year existence.
On 14 September, Peter Gøtzsche, director of the Cochrane’s Nordic centre and a member of its governing board, posted a statement on the centre’s website announcing that he had been expelled as a member of the Cochrane Collaboration, after a vote by 6 of 13 of the board’s members.
quote:
Gøtzsche says that no justification was given for the expulsion but that he was accused by the board of bringing the organization into “disrepute”. The organization — which carries out systematic reviews of health-care interventions — told Nature it had received “numerous complaints” about Gøtzsche after the publication earlier this year of a critique he co-authored, entitled ‘The Cochrane HPV vaccine review was incomplete and ignored important evidence of bias’ and published in the BMJ Evidence-Based Medicine.
quote:
Gøtzsche’s statement says that there is a “growing top-down authoritarian culture and an increasingly commercial business model” taking root at Cochrane that “threaten the scientific, moral and social objectives of the organization”?. He has also been an outspoken critic of Cochrane’s relationship with the pharmaceutical industry. (Cochrane’s policies state that its reviews cannot be “funded or conducted by commercial sponsors or commercial sources with a real or potential vested interest in the findings of a specific review”.)
David Hammerstein Mintz, a board member who stepped down in protest, said some members thought that Gøtzsche’s critical views of Cochrane were “disloyal”. (Nature has approached the collaboration for comment on these points and is awaiting its response.) “It might have been a headache, but the harm done by expelling Peter is much greater than any inconvenience caused by scientific debate,” he says.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:12 pm to ThinePreparedAni
https://www.politico.eu/article/bill-gates-who-most-powerful-doctor/
quote:
Meet the world’s most powerful doctor: Bill Gates
The software mogul’s sway over the World Health Organization spurs criticism about misplaced priorities and undue influence.
By NATALIE HUET AND CARMEN PAUN 5/4/17, 12:00 PM CET Updated 5/8/17, 11:52 AM CET
quote:
Some billionaires are satisfied with buying themselves an island. Bill Gates got a United Nations health agency in Geneva. Over the past decade, the world’s richest man has become the World Health Organization’s second biggest donor, second only to the United States and just above the United Kingdom. This largesse gives him outsized influence over its agenda, one that could grow as the U.S. and the U.K. threaten to cut funding if the agency doesn’t make a better investment case.
quote:
Already a decade ago, when Gates started throwing money into malaria eradication, top officials — including the chief of the WHO’s malaria program — raised concerns that the foundation was distorting research priorities. “The term often used was ‘monopolistic philanthropy’, the idea that Gates was taking his approach to computers and applying it to the Gates Foundation,” said a source close to the WHO board.
quote:
The billionaire was the first private individual to keynote WHO’s general assembly of member countries, and academics have coined a term for his sway in global health: the Bill Chill. Few people dare to openly criticize what he does. Most of 16 people interviewed on the topic would only do so on the condition of anonymity. “He is treated liked a head of state, not only at the WHO, but also at the G20,” a Geneva-based NGO representative said, calling Gates one of the most influential men in global health.
quote:
However, his sway has NGOs and academics worried. Some health advocates fear that because the Gates Foundation’s money comes from investments in big business, it could serve as a Trojan horse for corporate interests to undermine WHO’s role in setting standards and shaping health policies.
quote:
But the foundation’s focus on delivering vaccines and medicines, rather than on building resilient health systems, has drawn criticism. And some NGOs worry it may be too close to industry. In January, 30 health advocacy groups penned an open letter to WHO’s executive board protesting against making the Gates Foundation an official partner of the agency because its revenue comes from investments in companies that are at odds with public health goals, such as Coca-Cola.
A very important point as the MD in the OP should be reaching out to the state as a rally point to discuss improving baseline health through primary prevention instead of reductionist biotech...
quote:
“I don’t think they have any bad intentions. They are just such a big player that as immediately as they put money down they can disrupt things,” said one Geneva-based diplomat.
“As far as I can tell, people are really happy with anyone who is giving money,” said another.
---
https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/world/bill-gates-hoped-jeffrey-epstein-could-help-him-schmooze-his-way-to-nobel-peace-prize-report/ar-BB1gSzfH
quote:
Bill Gates Hoped Jeffrey Epstein Could Help Him Schmooze His Way to Nobel Peace Prize: Report
Tom McKay 5 hrs ago
quote:
Microsoft co-founder Bill Gates appears to have hopelessly lost control of his efforts to do damage control on his once-budding bromance with fellow billionaire and notorious serial child abuser Jeffrey Epstein.
Gates and his spokespeople have vehemently denied that he and the financier, who died in a New York jail in 2019 while awaiting trial for sex trafficking of dozens of minors, were ever friends or had any kind of business relationship. But story after story has emerged detailing a years-long connection entailing dozens of visits from 2011-2014, which reportedly infuriated his soon-to-be ex-spouse Melinda Gates and may have been a factor in their impending divorce—and the hits aren’t stopping. According to the Daily Beast, now a former staffer at Gates’ charitable foundation says Gates was attempting to leverage Epstein’s social network to sleaze his way into a Nobel Prize.
Epstein infamously cultivated a large circle of scientists, academics, researchers, tech elites, and other intellectual types, inviting them to lavish get-togethers and showering some with donations—perhaps just to entertain his disturbing scientific ponderings and indulge his ego, or perhaps in part because affluent, well-connected friends could help shield his crimes from public scrutiny. Gates has publicly cited a large number of rich people and others with connections to them in Epstein’s circle as the reason they mingled at all, hoping to lure donors to the Gates Foundation, despite Epstein’s 2008 conviction in Florida for soliciting a minor being widely known. The ex-staffer, who told the Daily Beast he was part of a team in charge of tracking “reputational risks” to Gates, said that Gates’ motivations were far more egotistical. He wanted one of the most prestigious awards a person can receive:
quote:
This person said members of the foundation’s communications team were alerted to Gates’ relationship with Epstein and were told it “was a maneuver to try to get himself a Nobel Peace Prize.” They said the tech mogul had even kept some employees on call on prize day in years past just in case he was awarded the distinction. ... “He [Gates] thought that Jeffrey would be able to help him, that he would know the right people, or some kind of way to massage things, so he could get the Nobel Peace Prize, which is what Bill wants more than anything else in the world,” the staffer said.
Quite the humanitarian...
What lengths would the wealthiest man in the world go through to be perceived as saving the world...
Makes ya wonder (as he owns the WHO...)
Problem
Reaction
Solution
This post was edited on 7/16/21 at 8:17 pm
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:12 pm to ThinePreparedAni
Technocracy.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:16 pm to RogerTheShrubber
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:19 pm to ThinePreparedAni
quote:
ThinePreparedAni
Not this guy again.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:20 pm to ThinePreparedAni
Q drop
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:21 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Not this guy again.
Nah, just a delta variant
The TVA has not pruned TPA...
This post was edited on 7/16/21 at 8:27 pm
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:23 pm to WDE24
quote:
Q drop
Quit deflecting and respond to what I posted...
$$$$
Ego
Control
Some folks don’t read history, hence the doom that awaits them...
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:23 pm to AlabamasSalaryCap
She is full of crap
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:32 pm to WDE24
Seems like she would get banned from Facebook and Twitter for passing false information.
That's precisely what these tech companies are doing, except when it's convenient to the chosen narrative.
That's precisely what these tech companies are doing, except when it's convenient to the chosen narrative.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:35 pm to AlabamasSalaryCap
Isn’t there medical licensing boards, medical associations, & hospital administrations in La. that have direct oversight of these lunatics? She’s entitled to her opinion, but she’s spouting off lies as a licensed medical professional in the state of La. At the very least she should have her license suspended for a lack of professionalism.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:36 pm to DrSteveBrule
quote:
DrSteveBrule
Are you a PhD doctor then?
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:37 pm to ThinePreparedAni
Thread hijack. What happened to all the UAP data?
Shits gone silent.
Shits gone silent.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:42 pm to MeridianDog
Ok, don't care
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:43 pm to Boomdaddy65201
At this point I would say she is a corporate officer of OLOL more than a practicing physician.
Even if they pulled her license, I don’t think it would affect her.
Even if they pulled her license, I don’t think it would affect her.
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:43 pm to Da Sheik
quote:
What happened to all the UAP data? Shits gone silent.
Some are waiting for the right time to weaponize this info/scenario...
Pay attention to the covid arc and election audit arc...
Posted on 7/16/21 at 8:43 pm to AlabamasSalaryCap
I don’t get the whole you need to get vaccinated if you’ve already had it angle. It’s counter to everything we know about viruses. I’m sure there’s some exceptions, but do we really know at this point? And I’m almost certain I’ll be forced to get it for work.
Page 9 of 21
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News