- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Do we have any 9/11 Truthers on here
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:34 am to StrawberriousJackson
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:34 am to StrawberriousJackson
quote:
Yea, a plane can make a perfect hole in the Pentagon with no plane debris left behind nor video catching the impact. Sure
There are pictures of plane debris dumbass.
2
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:39 am to SthGADawg
One of the witnesses in that chart you posted was my old boss.
He witnessed the plane fly over his car as he drove into work on S. Washington Blvd. Said he thought a plane taking off from Reagan was crashing. Many people who witnessed the plane said the same thing. He also witnessed the fireball after the crash.
Now if you want to say he's lying, or is in cahoots with the government, fine. But I believe him and think it's crazy to discredit the people who saw a low flying plane speeding towards the Pentagon.
He witnessed the plane fly over his car as he drove into work on S. Washington Blvd. Said he thought a plane taking off from Reagan was crashing. Many people who witnessed the plane said the same thing. He also witnessed the fireball after the crash.
Now if you want to say he's lying, or is in cahoots with the government, fine. But I believe him and think it's crazy to discredit the people who saw a low flying plane speeding towards the Pentagon.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:42 am to notiger1997
quote:
There are pictures of plane debris dumbass.
He will say they were photoshopped, or someone placed them there.
There's always a stupid excuse these idiots have.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:46 am to SthGADawg
quote:This dude already knows that anyone who may have been there was working on the opposite side.
even though they probably worked on the complete opposite side of the monstrosity...and were evacuated there as well....strong argument...
He's good, guys!!!
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:47 am to notiger1997
quote:
There are pictures of plane debris dumbass.
not a 757 there isn't...even in the earliest shots that news agencies took live...where the frick is the massive tail to that bird? where did it go? the hole is not deep enough for the whole plane to have gone all the way into the building...and if it had...the tail would have likely ripped into the roof......and the wings?...where are the wings damage at?...the fricking hole is not wide enough nor deep enough to have had that sized plane make that LITTLE damage...a small plane?...maybe....OPEN YOUR EYES AND LOOK
Length
155 ft 3 in / 47.3 m 178 ft 7 in / 54.4 m
Height
44 ft 6 in / 13.6 m
Wingspan
124 ft 10 in / 38.0 m
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:49 am to SthGADawg
The wings were sheered off because it hit the ground first.
Do you think when a plane hits a building it makes a perfect cartoon shaped hole in the building?
Do you think when a plane hits a building it makes a perfect cartoon shaped hole in the building?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:50 am to Bluefin
quote:
One of the witnesses in that chart you posted was my old boss. He witnessed the plane fly over his car as he drove into work on S. Washington Blvd. Said he thought a plane taking off from Reagan was crashing. Many people who witnessed the plane said the same thing. He also witnessed the fireball after the crash. Now if you want to say he's lying, or is in cahoots with the government, fine. But I believe him and think it's crazy to discredit the people who saw a low flying plane speeding towards the Pentagon.
is he aviation savy enough to confirm he saw a 757?
he was in his car right?
it couldn't have been a smaller plane hauling fricking arse?
he is certain it was Boeing 757-500 AA Flight 77?
and not something smaller?
just wondering...it probably happened pretty fast.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:51 am to Salmon
quote:
The wings were sheered off because it hit the ground first.
it did?
find me a picture that shows that plane hit the ground BEFORE impact.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:52 am to shel311
quote:
This dude already knows that anyone who may have been there was working on the opposite side.
i was saying that they would have been evaced to the opposite side of the damage and that particular area closed off to non essential personnel...
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:54 am to SthGADawg
quote:If it wasn't, where did this plane go?
he is certain it was Boeing 757-500 AA Flight 77?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:55 am to SthGADawg
quote:
is he aviation savy enough to confirm he saw a 757?
You make a great point. I'm sure it's hard to pick out all major aircraft flying straight at the pentagon on a daily basis.
God damn you're a fricking idiot.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 9:58 am to TFS4E
quote:
If it wasn't, where did this plane go?
who the frick knows...but it damn sure didn't hit the pentagon...if it had.....the damage would have been considerably more...that is a big fricking plane
those hajis were some damn good pilots too...almost like they may have had years and years of experience to fly a bird that big that low and at that angle of attack..its really not hard to question if one is willing to do so...but...we were told that it was a 757...so it must have been...and if one is willing to question...one must be a moron...
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:00 am to SthGADawg
quote:
who the frick knows...but it damn sure didn't hit the pentagon...if it had.....the damage would have been considerably more...that is a big fricking plane
It was either a missle or remote controlled drone with precision guidance
Face it... we are outnumbered. There are too many brainwashed blue pill programmed sheep who blindly parrot whatever narrative the government/CIA run media instills into their feeble brains.
Those of us brave enough to simply ask questions get ridiculed and mocked because we go against the programming that is dead set in the minds of so many. They don't know how to react because anything that goes against what they are programmed and brainwashed to believe makes them antsy.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:00 am to SthGADawg
So you think it was a missile and the government just made the real plane and all of its people disappear?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:02 am to goldennugget
i will admit the pentagon makes me question things.
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:02 am to SthGADawg
quote:
but it damn sure didn't hit the pentagon...if it had.....the damage would have been considerably more...that is a big fricking plane
You need to provide evidence for this claim. Any other examples of a plane that size hitting a building that you can compare?
quote:
its really not hard to question if one is willing to do so...but...we were told that it was a 757...so it must have been...and if one is willing to question...one must be a moron...
Ah...there it is
the conspiracy theorists #1 strawman
no one is calling you a moron for questioning things, questioning things is good
but when you are presented with logical and reasonable facts and completely ignore them without basis, then yes, then we can dismiss you as a moron
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:03 am to Centinel
quote:
God damn you're a fricking idiot.
something hit the pentagon that day...probably a plane...but not a 757...
you sir are idiotic for not being willing to even think that might be the case...
once again...where was the tail?...where were the wings?
why did that plane not make a bigger hole in the building..i mean it weighed like 255,000 lbs at takeoff? and was going how fast?
cmon dude..use your grey matter...im not saying that it never happened...I'm simply saying there are elements of that attack that can be questioned...legit engineering type stuff
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:03 am to goldennugget
quote:
Those of us brave enough to simply ask questions get ridiculed and mocked because we go against the programming that is dead set in the minds of so many. They don't know how to react because anything that goes against what they are programmed and brainwashed to believe makes them antsy.
there it is again
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:04 am to SthGADawg
quote:So wait, you said in no uncertain terms there was "no plane debris"
not a 757 there isn't
And now you're saying there was plane debris, just not a 757?
You can see how you're contradicting yourself here, correct?
Posted on 3/10/17 at 10:04 am to SthGADawg
quote:
once again...where was the tail?...where were the wings?
why did that plane not make a bigger hole in the building..i mean it weighed like 255,000 lbs at takeoff? and was going how fast?
every single one of these questions have been answered (they are a quick Google away), you have just chosen to ignore all of them
Page 9 of 13
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News