- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DJ Chark thinks water is not wet
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:51 pm to CaptainsWafer
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:51 pm to CaptainsWafer
quote:
How exactly does the posi-trac rearend on a Plymouth work?
It just does.
0
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:51 pm to AMS
quote:Can water become more wet if you add more water?
I understand my analogy.
And water is covered in water, it is also wet just like your bathing suit.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:53 pm to TigerMan79
Wet
noun
1.
liquid that makes something damp.
"I could feel the wet of his tears"
noun
1.
liquid that makes something damp.
"I could feel the wet of his tears"
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:57 pm to TigerMan79
What in the Common Core is he talking about?
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:00 pm to Peazey
quote:
So let's say that a person is standing naked. They aren't really uncovered. They're really covered by themselves.
By your definition "covered" itself loses meaning. It's supposed to mean having a layer of another thing over something. By your definition, something can be covered while standing alone and "surrounded" by nothing but itself.
No the definition works. Covered does not necessarily mean "entirely encapsulated in by 360 degrees" There can be a partial covering at 1 surface. 1 layer over something at a point.
When you use a blanket like a normal person, you are still "covered" although you are not entirely covered.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:01 pm to AMS
quote:
Covered does not necessarily mean "entirely encapsulated in by 360 degrees" There can be a partial covering at 1 surface. 1 layer over something at a point.
Back to your water bottle. Can you show the class these “layers” of water?
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:04 pm to Placebeaux
quote:
And Shaq thinks the earth is flat.
You realize he has made it clear he was joking right?
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:05 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Back to your water bottle. Can you show the class these “layers” of water?
Yea go back to that post and take a look at the water in the bottle. You see all the layers. The layers of water is why the water is visible at all.
Since we're back to that water bottle, You still have not pointed out where there is water that is not contacting water?
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 3:06 pm
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:07 pm to AMS
quote:
No the definition works. Covered does not necessarily mean "entirely encapsulated in by 360 degrees" There can be a partial covering at 1 surface. 1 layer over something at a point.
When you use a blanket like a normal person, you are still "covered" although you are not entirely covered.
This isn't even a refutation to my comment. Nowhere did I say that you have to be completely covered on all sides. I said that you have to be covered by a different "entity" or discrete thing. You said something can be covered by itself. It can be plainly naked but still covered by itself. As is the apparent state of water to you. Both covered and uncovered simultaneously.
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 3:08 pm
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:11 pm to AMS
quote:
Yea go back to that post and take a look at the water in the bottle. You see all the layers. The layers of water is why the water is visible at all.
What layers? I don’t see a single layer.
quote:
Since we're back to that water bottle, You still have not pointed out where there is water that is not contacting water?
The water is contacting the bottle. The water isn’t touching itself.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:13 pm to TigerMan79
Answer this question. How does something become wet? A liquid has to be applied to it right? Is water wet when you freeze it? You can take ice, put it on something and when it starts to melt, whatever it is placed on becomes wet.. So you can argue that water is not wet.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:14 pm to Peazey
quote:
This isn't even a refutation to my comment. Nowhere did I say that you have to be completely covered on all sides. I said that you have to be covered by a different "entity" or discrete thing. You said something can be covered by itself. It can be plainly naked but still covered by itself. As is the apparent state of water to you. Both covered and uncovered simultaneously.
For water to NOT cover itself that would mean that there is no water is touching any of the water. Partially covered is still covered. refer back to my water bottle image, there is water touching water.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:15 pm to beerJeep
quote:
The water is contacting the bottle. The water isn’t touching itself.
so water can contact the bottle but not itself? lmao
This is like saying my hand can't touch my body because its a part of my body.
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 3:19 pm
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:16 pm to beerJeep
I'm bored so I'll take another stab.
Water wets things, I think we all agree on that. In order for it to wet something, it must be wet itself.
So where's the hole in that logic? I'm sure there is one
Water wets things, I think we all agree on that. In order for it to wet something, it must be wet itself.
So where's the hole in that logic? I'm sure there is one
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 3:18 pm
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:18 pm to burdman
quote:What is it wet with...more water?
Water wets things, I think we all agree on that. In order for it to wet something, it must be wet itself.
So then I could make water more wet by adding more water?
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:20 pm to Yak
quote:
What is it wet with...more water?
So then I could make water more wet by adding more water?
The question isn't how do you wet water.
I'm asking how would it be possible for water to wet something if it's not wet itself?
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:21 pm to AMS
quote:
so water can contact the bottle but not itself? lmao
if water touches itself, it just increases the volume. It doesn’t change a single thing about the property of the water. It doesn’t change anything. If I spray water into the ocean, it doesn’t make the ocean wetter. Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:23 pm to burdman
quote:I mean, it kind of is when you say:
The question isn't how do you wet water.
quote:
it must be wet itself.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:23 pm to AMS
quote:
This is like saying my hand can't touch my body because its a part of my body.
Does your hand disappear into your leg and combine into one if you touch your leg? No? Hmmmmmmmmm............
Posted on 9/21/18 at 3:25 pm to burdman
quote:
Water wets things, I think we all agree on that. In order for it to wet something, it must be wet itself.
So where's the hole in that logic? I'm sure there is one
Bullets shoot things, I think we all agree on that. In order for them to shoot something, they must be shot themselves.
Verb vs. adjective matters.
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 3:26 pm
Page 5 of 10
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News