- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: DJ Chark thinks water is not wet
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:16 pm to AMS
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:16 pm to AMS
quote:
They both dry up. First the water, then the dirt and shite thats left behind.
The water didn’t dry. It evaporated into moisture into the air. Instead of making the ground wet, it makes the atmosphere wet via humidity.
So, like I said. How do you dry water?
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:17 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Just like water. It produces wet items. Water itself isn’t wet.
Except water is wet, simply by the definition of wet. water covers itself, and saturates itself. It's exactly that simple.
Sure Fire is not heat, but it does produce heat, and it is an integral component of fire. This is not relevant to the water discussion.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:18 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Fire produces heat, fire isn’t heat. Just like water produces wet items. Water itself isn’t wet.
If fire was heat, how do you explain heat without fire?
Friction produces heat and heat produces fire. But fire can also produce heat, meaning fire and heat are two independent variables. whereas water and wet are not independent of each other and your analogy fails.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:18 pm to AMS
quote:
Except water is wet, simply by the definition of wet. water covers itself, and saturates itself. It's exactly that simple
Wrong.
quote:
Sure Fire is not heat, but it does produce heat, and it is an integral component of fire. This is not relevant to the water discussion.
Sure it is. Fire isn’t heat just like water isn’t wet. Sorry you can’t grasp a simple concept. Even the definition of wet goes against you.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:19 pm to beerJeep
quote:
So, like I said. How do you dry water?
If wetness is covered or saturated in water, then one would uncover or unsaturate water to consider it dry. IE with heat, mechanical forces, etc. Removal/isolation of water from water is how you dry water.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:19 pm to TigerMan79
quote:
He had an argument with AJ Bouye (his Jacksonville teammate) that water is not wet. It's only when u apply water to something that it becomes wet.
I kind of agree.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:19 pm to Masterag
quote:
whereas water and wet are not independent of each other and your analogy fails.
Something can be wet without water. If I pour milk on something, it’s still wet
This post was edited on 9/21/18 at 2:20 pm
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:20 pm to TigerMan79
quote:
It's like saying a snail isn't slimy. Only what it touches is slimy.
Terrible analogy.
The snail is slimy because its covered in slime.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:21 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Something can be wet without water. If I pour milk on something, it’s still wet
First of all I agree that things can be wet without water, any liquids will suffice.
But again im amazed by your awful logic... you don't think there is water in milk?
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:22 pm to TheCaterpillar
quote:
The snail is slimy because its covered in slime.
This is exactly a perfect analogy for why water is wet.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:22 pm to beerJeep
quote:
Something can be wet without water. If I pour milk on something, it’s still wet
This is where it starts to fall apart because basically every liquid contains some amount of water.
Oil would be a better example than milk, but then you would be oily instead of wet.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:23 pm to AMS
quote:
But again im amazed by your awful logic.
Says the dude who thinks water is wet. Not my fault you can’t grasp a simple concept.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:25 pm to Shadowlink
quote:
wet wet/Submit adjective 1. covered or saturated with water or another liquid.
Looks like DJ is right
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:25 pm to AMS
quote:So water is wet because it's covered with wet? Because that's the analogy you're trying to make
This is exactly a perfect analogy for why water is wet.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:25 pm to burdman
quote:
This is where it starts to fall apart because basically every liquid contains some amount of water.
Oil would be a better example than milk, but then you would be oily instead of wet.
Per, Webster:
quote:
1a : consisting of, containing, covered with, or soaked with liquid (such as water)
Webster is pretty clear on the definition of wet. Something consisting of, containing, saturated with, or touching a liquid is wet.
These people are worse than flat earthers.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:27 pm to Yak
quote:
So water is wet because it's covered with wet? Because that's the analogy you're trying to make
If slime makes a snail slimey, the snail is covered in slime so its slimey.
if water makes something wet, then things that are covered in water are wet (water covers itself).
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:28 pm to cas4t
For the definition argument, water is wet when used as a noun.
quote:
wet
noun
1. liquid that makes something damp.
Posted on 9/21/18 at 2:30 pm to AMS
And Oxford says different.
quote:
1Covered or saturated with water or another liquid. ‘she followed, slipping on the wet rock’ More example sentencesSynonyms
Popular
Back to top



1






