Started By
Message

re: Diddy found GUILTY of transport for prostitution, NOT GUILTY on the more serious charges.

Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:02 pm to
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2149 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:02 pm to
quote:

quote:
It is weird they would be hung on the racketeering though, and find him not guilty on the rest.

Am I just dumb or didn't they return guilty on all those?

You're both wrong.
Posted by rickyh
Positiger Nation
Member since Dec 2003
12961 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:03 pm to
Reminds me of the feds bringing up gun charges on Hunter when the real crimes got ignored. P Diddy part II, what about the child abuse of the children? Are drugs being used To take advantage of unknowing people or just the amount of illegal drugs involved not a crime? What happend to underaged kids like Usher, Justin and the multible others not a crime. And what about the multitude of celebrities and politicians who participated in child abuse and sex trafficking? Oh, that's right, he slapped his mistress and paid to watch her do prostitues. The entire thing is made for TV. drama with the real crimes dismessed.
Posted by Athis
I AM Charlie Kirk....
Member since Aug 2016
15614 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:05 pm to
quote:

I heard they gave him life without babyoil
Posted by Zephyrius
Wharton, La.
Member since Dec 2004
9287 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:07 pm to
quote:

It is weird they would be hung on the racketeering though,

Do we even know who he was conspiring/ racketeering with? Seems the prosecution barely chased this charge.
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2149 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:18 pm to
quote:

Do we even know who he was conspiring/ racketeering with? Seems the prosecution barely chased this charge.

Scam to get the jury to return guilty verdicts on the lesser charges.
Posted by Reagan80
Earth
Member since Feb 2023
1693 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:19 pm to
I think he is not guilty on all counts.
Posted by MMauler
Primary This RINO Traitor
Member since Jun 2013
23827 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:21 pm to
quote:

Do we even know who he was conspiring/ racketeering with? Seems the prosecution barely chased this charge.



This is what I’m kind of having some puzzling thoughts over. It seems like if they did find him guilty of the “lesser offenses“ (Counts 2-5), why would they be hung on the most serious offense? In other words, if you voted him innocent on the four "lesser" counts, why would you be voting him guilty on the most serious count?

That's why I’m leaning towards him being guilty on counts 2–5.
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 5:27 pm
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
215957 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:21 pm to
Why should he be not guilty????
Posted by summersausage
Member since Jul 2010
1999 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:22 pm to
He didn’t just do what I think he did, Diddy?
Posted by ATrillionaire
Houston
Member since Sep 2008
2149 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:27 pm to
quote:

This is what I’m kind of having some puzzling thoughts over. It seems like if they found him guilty of the “lesser offenses“ (Counts 2-5), why would they be hung on the most serious offense? In other words, if you voted him innocent on the four "lesser" counts, why would you be voting him guilty on the most serious count?

That's why I’m leaning towards him being guilty on counts 2–5.

100% they have him guilty on the lesser counts. Makes sense to prefer this jury keep deliberating on the racketeering charge rather than risking a retrial.
Posted by blueboy
Member since Apr 2006
62578 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:34 pm to
quote:

what about the child abuse of the children? Are drugs being used To take advantage of unknowing people or just the amount of illegal drugs involved not a crime? What happend to underaged kids like Usher, Justin and the multible others not a crime. And what about the multitude of celebrities and politicians who participated in child abuse and sex trafficking?
Exactly. Diddy did some messed up and often violent shite, ever since being groomed himself by Clive Davis.
Posted by LSUTANGERINE
Baton Rouge and Northshore LA
Member since Sep 2006
37644 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 6:15 pm to
If they are still deliberating on the racketeering charge, then he’s most likely guilty on at least some of the other charges. Otherwise, it would be no need to deliberate on racketeering.
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
215957 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 6:27 pm to
This is a good point…. I just wonder what kind of sentence he will get if he is guilty of the 2-5 charges.
Posted by cajunangelle
Member since Oct 2012
161705 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:04 pm to
quote:

Sean "Diddy" Combs' allegedly laced baby oil with Rohypnol or GHB — known as the date rape drugs — to subdue his victims, according to a lawsuit against the music mogul.
This was in a lawsuit and supposedly proven via testing the baby oil.

For this alone, if any jury skates this vile POS Diddy it will be very sad. One would think a jury would imagine how helpless and violated victims were.

There is no way Diddy can prove consensual sex with this routine.
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 7:08 pm
Posted by idlewatcher
Planet Arium
Member since Jan 2012
91794 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:17 pm to
#Justice4theBiebs!
Posted by boosiebadazz
Member since Feb 2008
84167 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:18 pm to
I’ve only followed it through headlines and clickbait articles, but I think this is a bad sign for the prosecution.

The testimony I’ve heard was a lot of regret, and maybe some soft, lifestyle coercion from the girlfriends, but nothing criminal (except the LA video which isn’t charged). The sex workers appeared for pay.

Apparently they’re hung (lol) on racketeering which mandates them finding a predicate crime. That ominous for the government that they can’t do that.

It’s not popular, but I think he walks on the most serious stuff.
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 7:19 pm
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36152 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

I think he is not guilty on all counts.

If they had him as not guilty for the lesser counts then there would be no reason to be split on the rico charge. They obviously have him as guilty on the lesser charges right now.
Posted by LegendInMyMind
Member since Apr 2019
71027 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:33 pm to
quote:

But they seemed to be there voluntarily just because they wanted to live the high life using Diddy’s money. There's nothing illegal about that.

Hell, didn't some of them keep coming back around time and time again?
Posted by Epic Cajun
Lafayette, LA
Member since Feb 2013
36152 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:35 pm to
quote:

It’s not popular, but I think he walks on the most serious stuff.

Some of the lesser charges still carry mandatory minimums of 15 years…
Posted by dukke v
PLUTO
Member since Jul 2006
215957 posts
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:36 pm to
Wanting to be around fame and fortune is an addiction to so. They are desperate to be noticed and will go through whatever they need to so they can stay in that circle.
first pageprev pagePage 2 of 7Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram