- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Diddy found GUILTY of transport for prostitution, NOT GUILTY on the more serious charges.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:02 pm to IAmNERD
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:02 pm to IAmNERD
quote:
quote:
It is weird they would be hung on the racketeering though, and find him not guilty on the rest.
Am I just dumb or didn't they return guilty on all those?
You're both wrong.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:03 pm to Ghost of Colby
Reminds me of the feds bringing up gun charges on Hunter when the real crimes got ignored. P Diddy part II, what about the child abuse of the children? Are drugs being used To take advantage of unknowing people or just the amount of illegal drugs involved not a crime? What happend to underaged kids like Usher, Justin and the multible others not a crime. And what about the multitude of celebrities and politicians who participated in child abuse and sex trafficking? Oh, that's right, he slapped his mistress and paid to watch her do prostitues. The entire thing is made for TV. drama with the real crimes dismessed.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:05 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:
I heard they gave him life without babyoil
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:07 pm to IT_Dawg
quote:
It is weird they would be hung on the racketeering though,
Do we even know who he was conspiring/ racketeering with? Seems the prosecution barely chased this charge.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:18 pm to Zephyrius
quote:
Do we even know who he was conspiring/ racketeering with? Seems the prosecution barely chased this charge.
Scam to get the jury to return guilty verdicts on the lesser charges.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:19 pm to Jobin
I think he is not guilty on all counts.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:21 pm to Zephyrius
quote:
Do we even know who he was conspiring/ racketeering with? Seems the prosecution barely chased this charge.
This is what I’m kind of having some puzzling thoughts over. It seems like if they did find him guilty of the “lesser offenses“ (Counts 2-5), why would they be hung on the most serious offense? In other words, if you voted him innocent on the four "lesser" counts, why would you be voting him guilty on the most serious count?
That's why I’m leaning towards him being guilty on counts 2–5.
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 5:27 pm
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:21 pm to Nonetheless
Why should he be not guilty????
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:22 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
He didn’t just do what I think he did, Diddy?
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:27 pm to MMauler
quote:
This is what I’m kind of having some puzzling thoughts over. It seems like if they found him guilty of the “lesser offenses“ (Counts 2-5), why would they be hung on the most serious offense? In other words, if you voted him innocent on the four "lesser" counts, why would you be voting him guilty on the most serious count?
That's why I’m leaning towards him being guilty on counts 2–5.
100% they have him guilty on the lesser counts. Makes sense to prefer this jury keep deliberating on the racketeering charge rather than risking a retrial.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 5:34 pm to rickyh
quote:Exactly. Diddy did some messed up and often violent shite, ever since being groomed himself by Clive Davis.
what about the child abuse of the children? Are drugs being used To take advantage of unknowing people or just the amount of illegal drugs involved not a crime? What happend to underaged kids like Usher, Justin and the multible others not a crime. And what about the multitude of celebrities and politicians who participated in child abuse and sex trafficking?
Posted on 7/1/25 at 6:15 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
If they are still deliberating on the racketeering charge, then he’s most likely guilty on at least some of the other charges. Otherwise, it would be no need to deliberate on racketeering.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 6:27 pm to LSUTANGERINE
This is a good point…. I just wonder what kind of sentence he will get if he is guilty of the 2-5 charges.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:04 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
quote:This was in a lawsuit and supposedly proven via testing the baby oil.
Sean "Diddy" Combs' allegedly laced baby oil with Rohypnol or GHB — known as the date rape drugs — to subdue his victims, according to a lawsuit against the music mogul.
For this alone, if any jury skates this vile POS Diddy it will be very sad. One would think a jury would imagine how helpless and violated victims were.
There is no way Diddy can prove consensual sex with this routine.
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 7:08 pm
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:18 pm to Roll Tide Ravens
I’ve only followed it through headlines and clickbait articles, but I think this is a bad sign for the prosecution.
The testimony I’ve heard was a lot of regret, and maybe some soft, lifestyle coercion from the girlfriends, but nothing criminal (except the LA video which isn’t charged). The sex workers appeared for pay.
Apparently they’re hung (lol) on racketeering which mandates them finding a predicate crime. That ominous for the government that they can’t do that.
It’s not popular, but I think he walks on the most serious stuff.
The testimony I’ve heard was a lot of regret, and maybe some soft, lifestyle coercion from the girlfriends, but nothing criminal (except the LA video which isn’t charged). The sex workers appeared for pay.
Apparently they’re hung (lol) on racketeering which mandates them finding a predicate crime. That ominous for the government that they can’t do that.
It’s not popular, but I think he walks on the most serious stuff.
This post was edited on 7/1/25 at 7:19 pm
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:33 pm to Reagan80
quote:
I think he is not guilty on all counts.
If they had him as not guilty for the lesser counts then there would be no reason to be split on the rico charge. They obviously have him as guilty on the lesser charges right now.
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:33 pm to MMauler
quote:
But they seemed to be there voluntarily just because they wanted to live the high life using Diddy’s money. There's nothing illegal about that.
Hell, didn't some of them keep coming back around time and time again?
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:35 pm to boosiebadazz
quote:
It’s not popular, but I think he walks on the most serious stuff.
Some of the lesser charges still carry mandatory minimums of 15 years…
Posted on 7/1/25 at 7:36 pm to LegendInMyMind
Wanting to be around fame and fortune is an addiction to so. They are desperate to be noticed and will go through whatever they need to so they can stay in that circle.
Popular
Back to top


0











