Started By
Message

Did you know an aircraft carrier can power a city? Why don't they use them in texas?

Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:21 pm
Posted by BobbyB965
Member since Feb 2021
15 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:21 pm
word press

Don't see y we can't use our nuclear powered carriers to provide electricity in emergency
Posted by AgCoug
Houston
Member since Jan 2014
5862 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:22 pm to
I mean just plug it into the surge protector. Good to go.
Posted by SUB
Member since Jan 2001
Member since Jan 2009
20843 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:22 pm to
They don’t have a plug long enough from the ocean.
Posted by dragginass
Member since Jan 2013
2744 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:23 pm to
Because they are nuke powered, and hippies don't like the cleanest form of energy known to man.
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38691 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:24 pm to
Sail it up the Trinity to Dallas!
Posted by HeadSlash
TEAM LIVE BADASS - St. GEORGE
Member since Aug 2006
49671 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:24 pm to
quote:

hippies don't like the cleanest form of energy known to man.


Hippies are why we can't have anything nice.
Posted by Saint Alfonzo
Member since Jan 2019
22170 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:25 pm to
quote:

Did you know an aircraft carrier can power a city? Why don't they use them in texas?


Yeah, they don't really use aircraft carriers for that sort of thing.
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3015 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:26 pm to
Former navy nuclear operator.

1) A lot of the power is used to power the plant itself.

2) You need enough cabling and tie ins to make it work. Shore to ship power can only handle the minimum load to run the ship with the reactors shut down. Thus, you can’t export a 100% reactor power or remotely close (closer to 1%....maybe).

3) Raw MW goes mostly to steam production for the engines and catapults. So full reactor power can’t go toward electricity anyway. Without piping up extra turbines somehow.
Posted by goofball
Member since Mar 2015
16864 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:26 pm to
quote:

Did you know an aircraft carrier can power a city? Why don't they use them in texas?



Why not just build a reactor on land that permanently powers the city?

Oh wait. Progressives hate nuclear power despite it being clean and cheap. And they have subsequently regulated it to the point where it's just not feasible anymore.
Posted by notiger1997
Metairie
Member since May 2009
58132 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:27 pm to
LOL
Posted by Zappas Stache
Utility Muffin Research Kitchen
Member since Apr 2009
38691 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:30 pm to
quote:

Because they are nuke powered, and hippies don't like the cleanest form of energy known to man.




quote:

Lazard pegs the cost of building nuclear capacity in the United States at $5.4 million to $8.4 million per megawatt. Adding operating, maintenance, and fuel costs yields an average lifetime cost of $92 to $132 for every megawatt-hour generated.


quote:

Power from new natural-gas-fired plants is also far cheaper than nuclear at $61 to $87 per megawatt-hour


Posted by doubleb
Baton Rouge
Member since Aug 2006
36046 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:30 pm to
quote:


Don't see y we can't use our nuclear powered carriers to provide electricity in emergency


Yes!! Get a UPS strip and let folks plug in.
Posted by Oates Mustache
Member since Oct 2011
22069 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:31 pm to
quote:

Why not just build a reactor on land that permanently powers the city?

Oh wait. Progressives hate nuclear power despite it being clean and cheap. And they have subsequently regulated it to the point where it's just not feasible anymore.


Pretty amazing too, that people are willing to suffer through shite like what's going on in Texas rather than address this from a logical standpoint.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101920 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

aw MW goes mostly to steam production for the engines and catapults.


frick YES, let's catapult some shite!
Posted by Centinel
Idaho
Member since Sep 2016
43337 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:32 pm to
quote:

Lazard pegs the cost of building nuclear capacity in the United States at $5.4 million to $8.4 million per megawatt


Gee, and I wonder why that is.
Posted by LSUBoo
Knoxville, TN
Member since Mar 2006
101920 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:33 pm to
quote:

Lazard pegs the cost of building nuclear capacity in the United States at $5.4 million to $8.4 million per megawatt. Adding operating, maintenance, and fuel costs yields an average lifetime cost of $92 to $132 for every megawatt-hour generated.



quote:

Power from new natural-gas-fired plants is also far cheaper than nuclear at $61 to $87 per megawatt-hour


How does that compare to wind and solar?


Don't care about coal because we all know that's on the way out.
Posted by BRIllini07
Baton Rouge, LA
Member since Feb 2015
3015 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:34 pm to
I was on a submarine when we gave a tour to some local representatives in California during some brownouts. They asked the same question - but it’s even more ridiculous to ask from a sub (we could maybe power a small block in reverse? And that’s after you reverse/re-engineer all the interlocks preventing current back flow through the power grid).
Posted by 0x15E
Outer Space
Member since Sep 2020
12693 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:38 pm to
quote:

Why don't they use them in texas


$$$$
Posted by ksayetiger
Centenary Gents
Member since Jul 2007
68313 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:45 pm to
quote:

Hippies are why we can't have anything nice.


they nag about everything
Posted by Redbone
my castle
Member since Sep 2012
18845 posts
Posted on 2/17/21 at 3:46 pm to
quote:

Former navy nuclear operator.

1) A lot of the power is used to power the plant itself.

2) You need enough cabling and tie ins to make it work. Shore to ship power can only handle the minimum load to run the ship with the reactors shut down. Thus, you can’t export a 100% reactor power or remotely close (closer to 1%....maybe).

3) Raw MW goes mostly to steam production for the engines and catapults. So full reactor power can’t go toward electricity anyway. Without piping up extra turbines somehow.


4) There ain't no aircraft carriers sitting inland Tejas just doing nothing.
first pageprev pagePage 1 of 3Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on Twitter, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookTwitterInstagram