- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deputies arrest 4 in LSU student Madison Brooks case
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:45 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No in an arrest warrant is bad because it's a summary and extremely biased on one sided.
SO we're bac to the investigator lied and created quotes that aren't true? That should be pretty easy to prove.
1
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:45 am to wadewilson
quote:
So does that mean being intoxicated is no longer an issue with consent?
Again, you can be drunk and consent. You have to be incapable of understanding the act or in a stupor.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:46 am to LSUAngelHere1
Yay Mama 90210 is back
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:48 am to JudgeHolden
quote:
Again, you can be drunk and consent. You have to be incapable of understanding the act or in a stupor.
How do you not understand and keep going back to "just standing in the middle of the road" when the uber driver hit her and how that doesn't qualify you for any level of stupor you are seeking.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:49 am to LNCHBOX
quote:
SO we're bac to the investigator lied
No one said the investigator lied. An interview will be potentially hours long and boiled down to two sentences. The full report will have a lot more context and detail. With selective editing and creative use of words a cop can make an arrest warrant say almost anything. That's why they do a lot more than just what's on the arrest report to actually investigate the crimes for evidence to present a trial
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:49 am to HouseMom
quote:And if they tried to bring her to 3 different places and only let her out because she asked? They can’t exactly keep her against her will once she wants to get out. The dumped on the side of the road narrative seems to be the one that is fading fastest. It’s also the least relevant to anything. It doesn’t look like they will be charged with anything connected to her death.
they still dropped her off on the side of the road, very late at night, in the freezing cold. Zero regard for life or the safety of a lone female.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:49 am to LSUAngelHere1
quote:
He is also the one who said she was drunk, drunk. I mean drunk. People keep attributing that to Washington (who is clearly a rapist) but it was the uncle who said it.
No. The uncle's last name is Lee. In the affidavit, it is Mr. Washington who is quoted as saying she was "drunk, drunk".
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:50 am to HouseMom
quote:
Only if it's actually on video. Right now, it seems we only have the driver saying this about himself. Or did I miss something?
Right now you have:
—Haley, a defense lawyer
—Saying this is what the driver will say
—That she said.
It’s double or triple hearsay with the declarant deceased.
(Note: although it is hearsay, the driver could testify to it in a case against him or even against the others.)
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 9:51 am
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:51 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
No one said the investigator lied.
I guess bad evidence is an industry term.
Unless those statements magically go away, these guys are fricked.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:51 am to SlowFlowPro
So today we are going with “she wasn’t that drunk while she was just pounding random drinks from different tables”
And “they didn’t video the sexual acts in the car but have videos of everything else in the car before and after the sexual acts”
And now Angel has upped the ante to “she wanted to frick them all”
And Nak video is a bombshell because “she wasn’t being kept in car against her will”. Uhh…she still needed to get home
Just making sure I am up to date
And “they didn’t video the sexual acts in the car but have videos of everything else in the car before and after the sexual acts”
And now Angel has upped the ante to “she wanted to frick them all”
And Nak video is a bombshell because “she wasn’t being kept in car against her will”. Uhh…she still needed to get home
Just making sure I am up to date
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 9:57 am
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:52 am to SlowFlowPro
quote:
With selective editing and creative use of words a cop can make an arrest warrant say almost anything.
Exactly. It’s like a grand jury. Someone once said that a halfway decent prosecutor could get a grand jury to indict a ham sandwich.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:52 am to JudgeHolden
“She wanted all of them to fk her tho. When”
All for spirited discussed… unless this can be provided in video to the admins… I think it is past time to remove this poster….
All for spirited discussed… unless this can be provided in video to the admins… I think it is past time to remove this poster….
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:53 am to tigerskin
quote:
Just making sure I am up to date
Yes, evidently her ability to speakk and walk out of the car means she had the ability to consent to frick in her state of condition after these 4 guys are knowingly bringing home a drunk 19 year old from a bar at 2 am.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:53 am to SneezyBeltranIsHere
A lot of people aren’t going to understand BAC all that well. It’s a medical test. What they see on video on video will be stronger evidence to alot of people
Especially when the defense will get “experts” to show BAC isn’t always telling etc etc
Especially when the defense will get “experts” to show BAC isn’t always telling etc etc
This post was edited on 1/30/23 at 9:54 am
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:54 am to tigerskin
We are also at:
Anything that hurts the defense in the interview is ok. Anything that hurts the prosecution in an interview needs to also have video.
She didn't know anyone in Reggies and had to ride with them and only them but she worked at Reggies and everyone knew her there so Reggies needs to be shut down.
Anything that hurts the defense in the interview is ok. Anything that hurts the prosecution in an interview needs to also have video.
She didn't know anyone in Reggies and had to ride with them and only them but she worked at Reggies and everyone knew her there so Reggies needs to be shut down.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:55 am to lsu13lsu
quote:
We are also at:
Anything that hurts the defense in the interview is ok. Anything that hurts the prosecution in an interview needs to also have video.
An affidavit is slightly more compelling than the words of the defense lawyer
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:55 am to lsupride87
quote:
A lot of people aren’t going to understand BAC all that well. It’s a medical test. What they see on video on video will be stronger evidence to alot of people
Yeah the video of her talking and interacting is going to be 100x what the BAC would prove.
If the prosecution only has the BAC, it's going to open up an angle for the defense.
If the video shows her coherent and clearly communicating and understanding what's going on, then the BAC is going to be closer to irrelevant than damning
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:56 am to LNCHBOX
The defense lawyers are terrible.
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:56 am to LNCHBOX
quote:An affidavit is pretty much just the words of “the other team”
An affidavit is slightly more compelling than the words of the defense lawyer
Both should be taken with grains of salt
Posted on 1/30/23 at 9:57 am to lsupride87
quote:
An affidavit is pretty much just the words of “the other team”
Sigh, the words of the accused are more compelling. Is that better for you?
Page 280 of 419
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News