- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Deputies arrest 4 in LSU student Madison Brooks case
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:37 pm to LSBoosie
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:37 pm to LSBoosie
quote:
Side note that I was just thinking about, if Carver didn't turn himself in, do we even get to the point of wondering if any of this happened?
police knew who he was because they had identified the vehicle he was driving...i'm pretty sure his choices were to make arrangements to turn himself in or be picked up and arrested...
1
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:37 pm to Jim Rockford
quote:
How do we even know who the people are in that video? Looks like a bunch of randoms filmed at night from a distance .
Reggie’s has cameras from the inside too. They can obviously follow from the inside to out and know who is wearing what.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:37 pm to R11
quote:
Video shows dudes walking away…. She chased after them, but they are vultures?
Did you read the arrest warrant? Their own statements are telling.
The driver said he thought she was too drunk to consent and he felt it was wrong.
They said she was stumbling and trying to open doors to other cars. She didn’t know her address and could barely speak.
This wasn’t their girlfriend. They had never met her before. If you don’t think that’s wrong you have a problem. They knew they were taking advantage of her.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:37 pm to R11
quote:
God you’re worse than a little fricking girl
He's not wrong. Care to address his post instead of his tone?
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:37 pm to R11
quote:
And You knew someone else’s iniebriatuon? Gtfo here
You get the frick out of here - plenty of men take advantage of women when they’re drunk (and vice versa) that’s why laws were put into place - if you’ve been out drinking all night you can sort of guess someone is drunk
And if they’re pretty drunk - that means too drunk for consent - be an adult
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:39 pm to LordSaintly
quote:
He's not wrong. Care to address his post instead of his tone?
He won't. Hes a piece of shite
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:40 pm to notbilly
quote:
Has info been released so we know the 17 year old is black?
His name is Desmond
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:41 pm to Beef Tips
You cannot frick a girl that is too incoherent to give you her address. Period. Rape. Guilty.
Or at least should be.
But again, Baton Rouge jury. "She ran.."
Or at least should be.
But again, Baton Rouge jury. "She ran.."
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:41 pm to tigerskin
quote:
Reggie’s has cameras from the inside too.
I bet Reggie's goes and gives those to the news soon as well. At this point Reggie's owner's prob. don't GAF.
Play da tapes Jordy, play da Tapes..Dick vitale
This post was edited on 1/26/23 at 7:43 pm
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:41 pm to GreenRockTiger
Let’s also clarify the difference between someone you know and a stranger.
If your girlfriend (who has consented to sex with you many times before) is wasted and y’all have sex it’s a little different than someone you have never met before who is totally incoherent. That’s a different level of taking advantage of someone especially when they just drop you off in a random parking lot after. Their actions were very telling as to their motivation. They didn’t want to date her or meet up again. They used her and disposed of her.
I know the law probably doesn’t make that distinction but morally I believe there is a difference.
If your girlfriend (who has consented to sex with you many times before) is wasted and y’all have sex it’s a little different than someone you have never met before who is totally incoherent. That’s a different level of taking advantage of someone especially when they just drop you off in a random parking lot after. Their actions were very telling as to their motivation. They didn’t want to date her or meet up again. They used her and disposed of her.
I know the law probably doesn’t make that distinction but morally I believe there is a difference.
This post was edited on 1/26/23 at 7:47 pm
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:42 pm to pussywillows
quote:
police knew who he was because they had identified the vehicle he was driving...i'm pretty sure his choices were to make arrangements to turn himself in or be picked up and arrested...
Yeah I think they would've been led to those guys. I guess I was more so questioning if he wouldn't have turned himself in, they probably could've come up with a story and gotten away with it, unless they started running rape kits I suppose. He probably would have admitted either way.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:42 pm to Proximo
quote:
quote:
I made the point earlier that the white boy in a car was 18 years old and may not have understood that he could still be held liable, even though he didn’t participate in the actual rape. I said that 18 year old brains haven’t fully formed, and they are still learning.
Ignorance of the law is not a defense. This is basic stuff
Not even the law but basic right from wrong, like don't murder/assault/abuse people...or be aparty to it! 18 year olds should know that. I'm not arguing if 18 should be considered an adult or able to vote or drink or join the military...you are excusing violent crimes "bc their brains arent fully developed yet"...sheesh.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:43 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:well maybe the only way he gets lucky is to give the women (or men) a few drinks first
R11 sure sounds like a rapist. Excuse after excuse
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:43 pm to LordSaintly
No I don’t really care to address this loser who claims I’m a rapist bc I have diff pov then he does.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:43 pm to GreatLakesTiger24
quote:
From Reggie’s statement quote:Even though she entered the bar with false identification, she wasn’t served nor did she consume any drinks at least during the last hour she was at Reggie’s.
Didn’t she work there? Are they going to pretend they didn’t know her ID was fake? It doesn’t change the fact that a 17 was in there too.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:45 pm to LNCHBOX
quote:also the judge’s comments on the video
Sure if we ignore the rapists' statements and her BAC. fricking clown.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:46 pm to notbilly
And the statement says:
So how long was she in there for? Did she consume drinks during the other hours she was there?
quote:
she wasn’t served nor did she consume any drinks at least during the last hour she was at Reggie’s.
So how long was she in there for? Did she consume drinks during the other hours she was there?
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:47 pm to Beef Tips
But she’s coherent enough to run after them mins before the sex act?
Y’all can’t have it both ways.
To hear many of you guys tell it about her condition, ..one of the dudes was packing her over his shoulder leaving.
No way she could have been walking much less running towards them.
I have no bias in this case, just trying to consider all angles and be objective.
Y’all can’t have it both ways.
To hear many of you guys tell it about her condition, ..one of the dudes was packing her over his shoulder leaving.
No way she could have been walking much less running towards them.
I have no bias in this case, just trying to consider all angles and be objective.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:47 pm to R11
quote:
No I don’t really care to address this loser who claims I’m a rapist bc I have diff pov then he does.
I said you sound like one. And you do.
Posted on 1/26/23 at 7:48 pm to R11
quote:
Y’all can’t have it both ways.
Ok trillhog
Page 173 of 419
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News