- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Decisions: Shell Norco or Exxon Refinery
Posted on 3/26/19 at 10:44 pm to Oilfieldbiology
Posted on 3/26/19 at 10:44 pm to Oilfieldbiology
quote:
Exxon BR is the densest refinery
Shell had similar density in some older units, but I can see that being true. Exxon has its sprawl too, it has unused areas, so I'm not sure about the need to expand their footprint. My issue is that they have been there far too long to not have had time and funding to update the units. I have no idea how OSHA passes them, definitely some under the table pocket padding going on. You cant walk 10 feet without easily being burned on an uninsulated steam line.
This post was edited on 3/26/19 at 10:47 pm
Posted on 3/26/19 at 11:40 pm to Oilfieldbiology
This I have considered, I'm looking at moving to Prairieville
Posted on 3/26/19 at 11:53 pm to fightin tigers
I guess you started out in the industry as an expert with no questions. Good job
Posted on 5/4/19 at 3:45 pm to LSUtigerME
Any thoughts on the Shell Norco Refinery Alky unit?
Posted on 5/4/19 at 4:02 pm to Outlander83
Just take a fricking job and stop being an attention whore.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 4:38 pm to Outlander83
I don’t have any direct experience with the Norco Alky, but it’s not an HF unit so that’s a huge plus. In general, Alky units are not too bad. It uses Sulfuric Acid and light hydrocarbons, but not miserable to work compared to a Coker or FCCU. It’s a little more difficult to understand the process and often licensed through a 3rd party (like DuPont).
Posted on 5/4/19 at 4:44 pm to fightin tigers
Im not sure if shell has a pension but I know exxon does plus you get to keep your insurance after you retire
Posted on 5/4/19 at 4:48 pm to Bow dude72
Im not sure how the refinery is but I know shell pipeline is cutting back on people.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 5:27 pm to Trout Bandit
The question was directed toward one person. This is a discussion board and it was your decision to read the post. I apologize that I have attractive options and don't have connections in these particular plants to ask questions. Thanks again for your attention.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 5:30 pm to Bow dude72
Yeah I hope that's not a trend
Posted on 5/4/19 at 5:34 pm to Bow dude72
Shells pension is less then Exxon but I don't know by how much.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 5:50 pm to Outlander83
Go with the one who had given you an offer. What happens if you don't get an offer from the other one?
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:22 pm to Bow dude72
Both Shell and XOM have a pension. I believe neither have insurance after retirement anymore. This was phased out recently. I believe both allow you to maintain the company coverage, but the company does not continue to pay their portion.
The Shell plan is an accumulation of % based on Age + Years of Service (this increases over time from 4%/yr to 16%/yr). This is a one time payment upon retirement or termination. If you start around 30 and retire around 60, you’d earn roughly 300% of your final average salary.
At XOM, you earn 1.6% for every year of service. This is multiplied by your final average salary, and reduced if you retire early (Age 55 through 59.5). Using similar assumptions, you’d earn around 50% of your salary. However, this would be every year or you have the option to take a calculated lump sum (at a higher total based on some assumptions by the company).
So for pensions, XOM has the advantage. However, Shell contributes higher to your 401k, 10% once you’ve been with the company for 9 years.
The Shell plan is an accumulation of % based on Age + Years of Service (this increases over time from 4%/yr to 16%/yr). This is a one time payment upon retirement or termination. If you start around 30 and retire around 60, you’d earn roughly 300% of your final average salary.
At XOM, you earn 1.6% for every year of service. This is multiplied by your final average salary, and reduced if you retire early (Age 55 through 59.5). Using similar assumptions, you’d earn around 50% of your salary. However, this would be every year or you have the option to take a calculated lump sum (at a higher total based on some assumptions by the company).
So for pensions, XOM has the advantage. However, Shell contributes higher to your 401k, 10% once you’ve been with the company for 9 years.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:28 pm to Gugich22
I accepted the offer with Shell. Starting in a couple weeks. I interviewed with the Exxon complex three weeks ago and Exxon BRPO last week.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 6:30 pm to jimbeam
quote:
Just go to West Texas and work pipeline.
Doing what kind of work on pipeline?
Posted on 5/4/19 at 7:03 pm to Kujo
quote:
You cant walk 10 feet without easily being burned on an uninsulated steam line.
Mais, don' touch dat, you.
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 7:04 pm
Posted on 5/4/19 at 7:13 pm to LSUtigerME
quote:
The Shell plan is an accumulation of % based on Age + Years of Service (this increases over time from 4%/yr to 16%/yr). This is a one time payment upon retirement or termination. If you start around 30 and retire around 60, you’d earn roughly 300% of your final average salary. At XOM, you earn 1.6% for every year of service. This is multiplied by your final average salary, and reduced if you retire early (Age 55 through 59.5). Using similar assumptions, you’d earn around 50% of your salary. However, this would be every year or you have the option to take a calculated lump sum (at a higher total based on some assumptions by the company). So for pensions, XOM has the advantage. However, Shell contributes higher to your 401k, 10% once you’ve been with the company for 9 years.
For a company earning Billions of dollars per quarter, that’s really, really cheap of Shell.
Assuming a baw is making $100k per year, which is of course easily doable- the 300% payout would be $300k... Under the XOM pension, making the same $100k, you’d get $50k a year for life; if you live another 30 yrs after retiring at 60 (again, very realistic in this day and age) you’d eventually get $1.5 million.. even if Shell contributes more to the 401k, you probably still wouldnt approach that amount... Then again, having several generations of my own family who’ve worked for Shell, they do so much shady shite and poison their workers in various ways, so i guess the life expectancy after retirement isn’t real good, and they know that.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 10:02 pm to Outlander83
Shell Norco is a shite-hole! Been there, seen it! Don't know much about Exxon but you're probably better off in the long run with Exxon.
Posted on 5/4/19 at 11:50 pm to Sweltering Chill
Compounding interest baw. I am half asleep though so your probably right. I am in the salary side of the fence and would love to find the best pension / salary ratio.
This post was edited on 5/4/19 at 11:51 pm
Popular
Back to top
