- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Court rules against Oregon bakers in wedding-cake case
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:36 pm to ShreveportHog94
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:36 pm to ShreveportHog94
quote:
I hope the 135k crippled their business and were forced to close. F those bigots.
Your mom should have swallowed the load.
0
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:36 pm to Dire Wolf
That didn't help the statues but like I said earlier double standards for certain demographics. Nothing new here
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:38 pm to WildcatMike
Appellate court is now Supreme Court?
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:39 pm to Byron Bojangles III
quote:
These POS owners also released the couple's personal info to the public and encouraged the public to harass them.
Is this code for the couples personal info (name, address, etc.) became public after they filed a lawsuit against the baker?
Probably.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 9:44 pm to Byron Bojangles III
Because no non Christian has ever molested children. Damn, this thread has brought out the stupid.
Posted on 12/28/17 at 10:12 pm to Byron Bojangles III
you liberals sure think about little kids a lot
Posted on 12/28/17 at 10:14 pm to Will Cover
quote:
Today's ruling sends a strong signal that Oregon remains open to all," Avakian said after the 62-page opinion was released Thursday.
You will be tolerant god dammit!!
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:16 am to Dire Wolf
quote:
n Christians have no room to talk
see: Blue Laws
Business shouldn’t have a choice in who they serve. See bad govt enforced law as to why business shouldn’t have this choice.
This post was edited on 12/29/17 at 12:18 am
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:19 am to Will Cover
The 9th Circuit is ............... 
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:38 am to C
quote:
Business shouldn’t have a choice in who they serve.
Yeah because frick freedom of commerce right? Scum.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 12:42 am to Havoc
quote:
Yeah because frick freedom of commerce right?
Would you mind expounding upon that comment as it applies to the subject of the OP?
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:23 am to C
quote:
Business shouldn’t have a choice in who they serve.
So if a Christian went to a gay artist and asked them to do a painting of gays burning in hell you think the government should force the artist to do the painting?
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:36 am to Will Cover
I really don't understand this.
1. You're a public bakery. Bake the cake. Why ask who or what the cake is for? If someone walks in and places an order, who the frick are they to ask "well, who is it for?" Whether they are gay cake bakers or not. Who the frick cares?
2. They were not asked to perform the lesbian ceremony or "partiicpate" in any way. They were asked to bake flour and water. fricking bake it and keep your religious beliefs out of it. If someone walked in and asked for a Devil cake, then fricking make it.
3. I agree,these lesbos could have walked away, destroyed their business on Yelp or through reviews but didn't. And now its a huge story in the media.
4. I don't care what you worship, who you worship but if you are a public business, you shouldn't be able to discriminate on who you serve because it doesn't fit "your beliefs". Sounds alot like ISIS imposing their shite beliefs on others.
1. You're a public bakery. Bake the cake. Why ask who or what the cake is for? If someone walks in and places an order, who the frick are they to ask "well, who is it for?" Whether they are gay cake bakers or not. Who the frick cares?
2. They were not asked to perform the lesbian ceremony or "partiicpate" in any way. They were asked to bake flour and water. fricking bake it and keep your religious beliefs out of it. If someone walked in and asked for a Devil cake, then fricking make it.
3. I agree,these lesbos could have walked away, destroyed their business on Yelp or through reviews but didn't. And now its a huge story in the media.
4. I don't care what you worship, who you worship but if you are a public business, you shouldn't be able to discriminate on who you serve because it doesn't fit "your beliefs". Sounds alot like ISIS imposing their shite beliefs on others.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:41 am to PeterPeterP
quote:
I really don't understand this.
why can't a business choose who they want serve and what kind of work they want to do?
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:47 am to MorbidTheClown
quote:
why can't a business choose who they want serve and what kind of work they want to do?
If you're open to the public, then they should do their jobs or risk losing their business, which these idiots did all because of "religious beliefs". You don't think that's a bit ridiculous?
And then, where does it stop. What if I opened a business, and kids came in and wanted my food? I say nope! Don't believe in serving kids. Get out. Or what if a few Asians came in. NOPE! I don't like asians, GET OUT!
It just seems so over the top and ridiculous. Bake the fricking cake and move on.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:50 am to PeterPeterP
quote:
And then, where does it stop. What if I opened a business, and kids came in and wanted my food? I say nope! Don't believe in serving kids. Get out. Or what if a few Asians came in.
And if the community thought this was an egregious act, they would boycot and not patronize the store, and he'd go out of business. This is how free enterprise operates. What you want is government control of businesses.
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:51 am to PeterPeterP
quote:all of this should be allowed
What if I opened a business, and kids came in and wanted my food? I say nope! Don't believe in serving kids. Get out. Or what if a few Asians came in. NOPE! I don't like asians, GET OUT!
property rights are paramount in western society
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:52 am to PeterPeterP
What if someone came in wanting a bdsm wedding cake or a hentai wedding cake or two dogs fricking?
None of that is illegal.
Should the cake maker have to make that cake?
Hmmmm? Should he?
None of that is illegal.
Should the cake maker have to make that cake?
Hmmmm? Should he?
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:57 am to ShreveportHog94
quote:
A small business owner should have the right to refuse business, for whatever reason as they see fit.
If I were the only 24 hr tow truck driver in town I should be able to deny you service for whatever I see fit.
Well, let me present a situation to you.
Say you are African American who runs the single 24 hr tow truck company in town and some redneck calls you up and tells you, "Hey you mother-f**ckin' **** n***er, come get tow my car to the shop!"
Do you do it?
Posted on 12/29/17 at 7:58 am to PeterPeterP
quote:
You don't think that's a bit ridiculous?
people standing firm on their beliefs is ridiculous? Interesting POV.
if i own a business i should be able to choose who i serve or not serve. If that hurts my business then, so be it.
Don't bake the cake. if you lose enough business where you have to close, at least it was YOUR choice.
Page 5 of 12
Popular
Back to top
Follow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News