- My Forums
- Tiger Rant
- LSU Recruiting
- SEC Rant
- Saints Talk
- Pelicans Talk
- More Sports Board
- Coaching Changes
- Fantasy Sports
- Golf Board
- Soccer Board
- O-T Lounge
- Tech Board
- Home/Garden Board
- Outdoor Board
- Health/Fitness Board
- Movie/TV Board
- Book Board
- Music Board
- Political Talk
- Money Talk
- Fark Board
- Gaming Board
- Travel Board
- Food/Drink Board
- Ticket Exchange
- TD Help Board
Customize My Forums- View All Forums
- Show Left Links
- Topic Sort Options
- Trending Topics
- Recent Topics
- Active Topics
Started By
Message
re: Could the Moon be used as a lifeboat to avoid an extinction-level asteroid impact?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 7:37 pm to J Murdah
Posted on 11/10/21 at 7:37 pm to J Murdah
quote:If you’re counting on Jupiter to be our protection, I hate to inform you that it will be caught out of position more than the 2020 LSU defense.
Jupiter is basically our protection because of it's gravitational pull. If anything gets by and manages to hit us then that's just fate.
Posted on 11/10/21 at 7:57 pm to UndercoverBryologist
Do we really want to take everybody?
Posted on 11/10/21 at 7:59 pm to Jor Jor The Dinosaur
yea man, really counting on it. the anxiety is killing me
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:00 pm to UndercoverBryologist
Not if the earth is significantly destroyed. Without the earth's gravitational pull to keep the moon in check, it becomes an astroid.
Posted on 11/11/21 at 12:07 pm to UndercoverBryologist
If we have the tech to reasonably put colonists on mars we could probably save a few dozen pockets of humanity in underground shelters around the world long enough for the dust to settle and nuclear winter to diminish. I mean, it’s likely that Martian settlements will end up being underground just to escape the radiation from no magnetic field. The atmosphere is pretty much a vacuum of entirely CO2 with what little it has. Changing these facts would require some extreme terraforming on the scale of centuries. So let’s consider the colony. They lose their homeworld’s constant influx of life support to an asteroid. Yeah they aren’t gonna be terraforming on any relevant scale for a very long time. Unless the asteroid was just ridiculously oversized, life has better options on earth in the long term
All those nukes sitting around still has the ability to be the worst case scenario for life on the planet. The radiation alone makes this scenario so much worse than an asteroid
All those nukes sitting around still has the ability to be the worst case scenario for life on the planet. The radiation alone makes this scenario so much worse than an asteroid
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 12:11 pm
Posted on 11/11/21 at 12:10 pm to GetEmTigers08
Wouldn’t the biggest problem with terraforming be the moons inability to hold on to an atmosphere that could sustain us?
Posted on 11/11/21 at 12:16 pm to td1
The moon is smaller than mars and also has no magnetic field. So all gases that form on the surface will eventually waste away into space. This has been happening to mars now for quite a while. It’s believed it did have a strong field in the past that has since went away and let all of the atmosphere waste away. What didn’t escape is everything that is now trapped as ice under the surface(so that it isn’t allowed to sublimate into atmosphere). I think mars is partly salvageable over the next millennium, but it will be a massive undertaking and the real winners will be the massive amounts of discoveries and research done just for this undertaking
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 12:21 pm
Posted on 11/11/21 at 1:05 pm to fr33manator
quote:
quote:
We won't be needing Nickelback. So that's 4 people we can leave behind.
I can think of about “81 million” more.
Most of those people have already left the planet, spiritually at least.
Popular
Back to top

1






