Started By
Message

re: Could the Moon be used as a lifeboat to avoid an extinction-level asteroid impact?

Posted on 11/10/21 at 7:37 pm to
Posted by Jor Jor The Dinosaur
Chicago, IL
Member since Nov 2014
7200 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 7:37 pm to
quote:

Jupiter is basically our protection because of it's gravitational pull. If anything gets by and manages to hit us then that's just fate.
If you’re counting on Jupiter to be our protection, I hate to inform you that it will be caught out of position more than the 2020 LSU defense.
Posted by chryso
Baton Rouge
Member since Jul 2008
13514 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 7:57 pm to
Do we really want to take everybody?
Posted by J Murdah
Member since Jun 2008
40111 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 7:59 pm to
yea man, really counting on it. the anxiety is killing me
Posted by Mid Iowa Tiger
Undisclosed Secure Location
Member since Feb 2008
23664 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:00 pm to
Not if the earth is significantly destroyed. Without the earth's gravitational pull to keep the moon in check, it becomes an astroid.
Posted by SteelerBravesDawg
Member since Sep 2020
43337 posts
Posted on 11/10/21 at 8:15 pm to
Posted by GetEmTigers08
Mississippi
Member since Dec 2007
1239 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 12:07 pm to
If we have the tech to reasonably put colonists on mars we could probably save a few dozen pockets of humanity in underground shelters around the world long enough for the dust to settle and nuclear winter to diminish. I mean, it’s likely that Martian settlements will end up being underground just to escape the radiation from no magnetic field. The atmosphere is pretty much a vacuum of entirely CO2 with what little it has. Changing these facts would require some extreme terraforming on the scale of centuries. So let’s consider the colony. They lose their homeworld’s constant influx of life support to an asteroid. Yeah they aren’t gonna be terraforming on any relevant scale for a very long time. Unless the asteroid was just ridiculously oversized, life has better options on earth in the long term

All those nukes sitting around still has the ability to be the worst case scenario for life on the planet. The radiation alone makes this scenario so much worse than an asteroid
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 12:11 pm
Posted by td1
Baton Rouge
Member since Oct 2015
3143 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 12:10 pm to
Wouldn’t the biggest problem with terraforming be the moons inability to hold on to an atmosphere that could sustain us?
Posted by GetEmTigers08
Mississippi
Member since Dec 2007
1239 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 12:16 pm to
The moon is smaller than mars and also has no magnetic field. So all gases that form on the surface will eventually waste away into space. This has been happening to mars now for quite a while. It’s believed it did have a strong field in the past that has since went away and let all of the atmosphere waste away. What didn’t escape is everything that is now trapped as ice under the surface(so that it isn’t allowed to sublimate into atmosphere). I think mars is partly salvageable over the next millennium, but it will be a massive undertaking and the real winners will be the massive amounts of discoveries and research done just for this undertaking
This post was edited on 11/11/21 at 12:21 pm
Posted by Steadyhands
Slightly above I-10
Member since May 2016
7119 posts
Posted on 11/11/21 at 1:05 pm to
quote:

quote:
We won't be needing Nickelback. So that's 4 people we can leave behind.


I can think of about “81 million” more.


Most of those people have already left the planet, spiritually at least.
first pageprev pagePage 3 of 3Next pagelast page
refresh

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram