Started By
Message

re: Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) ***W.H.O. DECLARES A GLOBAL PANDEMIC***

Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:54 pm to
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46735 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:54 pm to
Tired of repeating myself but I haven’t.

I have consistently focused on South Korea numbers. But damn does it hurt y’alls feelings that much to be honest about what is happening somewhere else as well?

Done for the night.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88021 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:55 pm to
23% of Italy’s population is elderly. Second highest in the world. That and the lack of ICU beds can cause a problem.

Now the government may be deciding who gets treatment and who they just let die. Yay socialism.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88021 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:56 pm to
It’s okay to add context to the different numbers right? Like when people freak out when they hear the USA is at 4% but then you tell them most of those are from one nursing home, they don’t have a response.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15012 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:57 pm to
quote:

 isn’t chicken little. It is more of a problem than just deaths. They have said they have overwhelmed hospitals. Educate yourself


I am a Masters prepared Nurse...I feel like I have a pretty good handle on the severity of this outbreak...I am briefed regularly on Statewide preparedness and regional hospital census, and I am constantly on the Johns Hopkins Covid19 site for updates on total known cases and deaths worldwide...
Now, give me your education and experience levels to speak on this?

I am not saying this isn't an unwanted problem. But the MSM is losing their collective minds..and scaring folks unnecessarily. When a million people have died and not a few thousand let me know...
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46735 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:58 pm to
I have also repeatedly said our mortality numbers are a bunch of crap because we aren’t testing the mild cases.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46735 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:58 pm to
I am a physician.
Posted by cooLStorybreaUx
Member since Aug 2014
600 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:59 pm to
quote:

They sure did...over 9000 known cases and 400 deaths....OMG!!!
How many people have died in car wrecks in Italy in the last 2 weeks....uh, also cases/deaths from normal flu????


This is a laughable take. The death percentage for the flu is .1% (not even considering that half of people with the flu don't get tested for it) Coronavirus is over 4% (with equal consideration of testing). Not even comparable. People get in car crashes, what does that have to do with the CVirus?
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88021 posts
Posted on 3/9/20 at 11:59 pm to
Great. So then what’s the issue?

US could test more. Italy is old. Germany hasn’t had it long enough. China is too third world. Yay for SK.

Did I miss anything?
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88021 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:02 am to
Hold up. The 0.1% flu number isn’t deflated because of lack of testing. The cdc uses estimates on total cases both confirmed by testing and unconfirmed because obviously not everyone gets tested. The 0.1% isn’t using only the positive tests as the denominator.
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88021 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:07 am to
quote:

Coronavirus is over 4% (with equal consideration of testing). Not even comparable.
Also, for context. Because the 4% number only uses positive test cases as the denominator, it’s going to be much lower if the cdc ever did an estimate like it does the flu. And the numerator is still inflated with Chinese numbers and missing tons of data. This is in outbreak mode and the comparison to recurring, well-documented virus is a little absurd to begin with. Which is why so many people are extrapolating and trying to add context to better understand the severity. Except people are using their own biased data and methods to confirm whatever notions they had to begin with.
Posted by Tigahs24Seven
Charlie Kirk's America
Member since Nov 2007
15012 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:07 am to
quote:


This is a laughable take. The death percentage for the flu is .1% (not even considering that half of people with the flu don't get tested for it) Coronavirus is over 4% (with equal consideration of testing). Not even comparable. People get in car crashes, what does that have to do with the CVirus?


Look, 20,000 people have died in the US from flu this year... TWENTY THOUSAND....many more than that from car crashes. Do we shut the country down each year for the friggin flu?????? Stop all car driving???? Get rational...we have had what, 30 deaths in the US??
..21 of those from 1 Nursing home???
The high death rate is due to little to NO testing....low known morbidity shows a skewed mortality. When the final numbers are known a year from now I will ban bet you it will be less than 1%.
The media has lost all sense of reality and half this board has too.
Posted by cooLStorybreaUx
Member since Aug 2014
600 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:14 am to
quote:

Hold up. The 0.1% flu number isn’t deflated because of lack of testing. The cdc uses estimates on total cases both confirmed by testing and unconfirmed because obviously not everyone gets tested. The 0.1% isn’t using only the positive tests as the denominator.


Ok, fair enough. It's an estimate. It could be slightly more or less. Let's pretend it was .2% (it's not) .2% is significantly less than 4%, even if there was a huge miscalculation (there isn't), .2% is significantly lower than 3%. It's a baseless point. The results are still the same, one is not equal to the other.
Posted by Freight Joker
Member since Aug 2019
4017 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:14 am to
quote:

Look, 20,000 people have died in the US from flu this year... TWENTY THOUSAND....many more than that from car crashes. Do we shut the country down each year for the friggin flu?????? Stop all car driving???? Get rational...we have had what, 30 deaths in the US?? ..21 of those from 1 Nursing home??? The high death rate is due to little to NO testing....low known morbidity shows a skewed mortality. When the final numbers are known a year from now I will ban bet you it will be less than 1%. The media has lost all sense of reality and half this board has too.


O/U 7 downvotes
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88021 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:16 am to
I’m not saying the 0.1% is wrong. Just that it’s certainly not much different (definitely not lower) because the cdc estimates cases that aren’t reported.
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46735 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:16 am to
You are one hard headed “know it all” nurse. Here is some light reading for you

“Sharing from an ER physician friend:

Ok. This is heavy medical stuff, so mostly for my colleagues like myself who are dealing with things on the front lines, but this is very pertinent information for healthcare workers. It is the most detailed info I have seen so far on what we are dealing with.

This is from an anonymous intensivist in Washington state caring for covid patients. My ED director forwarded this to our group. I'm estimating it is probably a week old, given that our state lab can now process more testing kits than what is mentioned in this doctor's summary.

This is from an intensivist at XXXX and it has some very good clinical info -
_________________________________
“We've been told not to share info, but we are all doing it anyway.
Since COVID is now deemed endemic in the XXXX area, and to quote a reliable source, the rest of the country is just "lagging behind," thought I'd share some relevant details, including from CDC teleconference today for COVID providers.
- as we all assumed, it has been in community spread locally for weeks. We have seen idiopathic ARDS cases since early/mid-Feb. Retrospective testing is being done where possible. - the numbers presented in media do not reflect actual cases, obvs. Testing here only started 2/28. Our first CONFIRMED death was 2/23.
=XXX State Lab can only run 26kits/day, though they are ramping up quickly. Despite strict criteria for testing, there is a 3d backlog at this time.
- Negative Resp Path PCR is required before SARS2 test will be accepted. We have been running out of RP PCRs. This is unheard of, especially as most admitted resp pts get one during flu/cold season (mostly for approp iso, since RSV is contact). Goddess bless the local Children's hospital for sending us 60 the other night. Your hospital should begin stocking up on RP PCRs now. Our Public Health dept does not expect SARS2 tests to be ample enough to d/c the neg RP PCR requirement.
- on a related note, county lab no longer runs tests from pts not sick enough to be admitted, since dz is now endemic. Expect this will be the case elsewhere soon.
- as of today, we have 21 pts and 11 deaths since 2/28. Not including the postmortem retrospective dx of pts who died with idiopathic ARDS the prior week. Of note, Harborview had an idiopath ARDS death 2/26. There will be more retrospective dx. - our mortality rate is skewed up (and in some cases, down) because many of our pts come from the LCCK SNF (Lifecare Care Center of Kirkland) & are elderly and severely chronically medically ill - the sort of pts who die of rhinovirus. Many of these patients' families are opting for comfort care, as many are DNI. We have 3 such on the floor on comfort care now. Of note, those 3 pts have what would be considered mild infxn in a different cohort.
- we are seeing pts who are young (20s), fit, no comorbidities, critically ill. It does happen. - media (including NYT) are mentioning "efforts to contain the outbreak" at the SNF.
I'm sure you are all aware, but the US has been past containment since January, and the SNF cases aren't an "outbreak" they're a cluster. - thus far many pts have contacts there (esp visiting family members), but also at a local HD center and a car dealership. Others have zero identifiable contacts at all, tho I suspect many have Costco-horde connections, heh. - fortunately Evergreen has capability to turn all or half of any ward into a neg pressure zone
Currently, all of ICU is for critically ill COVIDs, all of XXX floor medsurg for stable COVIDs and EOL care, half of PCU, half of ER. New resp-sx pts Pulmonary Clinic offshoot is open.
- in XXXX, CDC is no longer imposing home quarantine on providers who were wearing only droplet iso PPE when intubating, suctioning, bronching, and in one case doing bloody neurosurgery on these pts in the week prior to testing starting. Because that resulted in our Stroke Center hospital no longer being able to admit LVOs or any kind of bleed. And decimated 10% of our Hospitalists, 3 of the 6 Night docs, and a PCCM. Plus it's now endemic. Expect when it comes to your place you may initially have staff home-quarantined. Plan for this NOW. Consider wearing airborne iso PPE for aerosol-generating procedures in ANY pt in whom you suspect COVID, just to prevent the mass quarantines.
- we ran out of N95s (thanks, Costco hoarders) and are bleaching and re-using PAPRs, which is not the manufacturer's recommendation. Not surprised on N95s as we use mostly CAPRs anyway, but still. Supplies are en route, but your facility may wish to stock up now, esp if you expect each staff member and room to have its own PAPR/CAPR.
- terminal cleans (inc UV light) for ER COVID rooms are taking forever, Enviro Services is overwhelmed. Bad as pts are stuck coughing in the waiting room. Rec planning now for Enviro upstaffing, or having a plan for sick pts to wait in their cars (that is not legal here, sadly).
Posted by tigerskin
Member since Nov 2004
46735 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:17 am to
- CLINICAL INFO based on our cases and info from CDC conf call today with other COVID providers in US:
- the Chinese data on 80% mildly ill, 14% hospital-ill, 6-8% critically ill are generally on the mark. Data very skewed by late and very limited testing, and the number of our elderly pts going to comfort care. - being young & healthy (zero medical problems) does not rule out becoming vented or dead - probably the time course to developing significant lower resp sx is about a week or longer (which also fits with timing of sick cases we started seeing here, after we all assumed it was endemic as of late Jan/early Feb). - based on our hospitalized cases (including the not formally diagnosed ones who are obviously COVID - it is quite clinically unique) about 1/3 have mild lower resp sx, need 1-5L NC. 1/3 are sicker, FM or NRB. 1/3 tubed with ARDS. Thus far, everyone is seeing: - nl WBC. Almost always lymphopenic, occasionally poly-predominant but with nl total WBC. Doesn't change, even 10days in. - BAL lymphocytic despite blood lymphopenic (try not to bronch these pts; this data is from pre-testing time when we had several idiopathic ARDS cases) - fevers, often high, may be intermittent; persistently febrile, often for >10d. It isn't the dexmed, it's the SARS2. - low ProCalc; may be useful to check initially for later trending if later concern for VAP etc. - up AST/ALT, sometimes alk phos. Usually in 70-100 range. No fulminant hepatitis. Notably, in our small sample, higher transaminitis at admit (150-200) correlates with clinical deterioration and progression to ARDS. LFTs typically begin to bump in 2nd week of clinical course. - mild AKI (Cr <2). Uncertain if direct viral effect, but notably SARS2 RNA fragments have been identified in liver, kidneys, heart, and blood.
- characteristic CXR always bilateral patchy or reticular infiltrates, sometimes perihilar despite nl EF and volume down at presentation. At time of presentation may be subtle, but always present, even in our pts on chronic high dose steroids. NO effusions. CT is as expected, rarely mild mediastinal LAD, occ small effusions late in course which might be related to volume status/cap leak.
- Note - China is CT'ing everyone, even outpts, as a primarily diagnostic modality. However, in US/Europe, CT is rare, since findings are nonspecific, would not change management, and the ENTIRE scanner and room have to terminal-cleaned, which is just impossible in a busy hospital. Also, transport in PAPRs. Etc. 2 of our pts had CTs for idiopathic ARDS in the pre-test era; they looked like the CTs in the journal articles. Not more helpful than CXR. - when resp failure occurs, it is RAPID (likely 7-10d out from sx onset, but rapid progression from hospital admit). Common scenario for our pts is, admit 1L NC. Next 12hrs -> NPPV. Next 12-24hrs -> vent/proned/Flolan. - interestingly, despite some needing Flolan, the hypoxia is not as refractory as with H1N1. Quite different, and quite unique. Odd enough that you'd notice and say hmmm. - thus far many are dying of cardiac arrest rather than inability to ventilate/oxygenate. - given the inevitable rapid progression to ETT once resp decompensation begins, we and other hosps, including Wuhan, are doing early intubation. Facemask is fine, but if needing HFNC or NPPV just tube them. They definitely will need a tube anyway, & no point risking the aerosols. - no MOSF. There's the mild AST/ALT elevation, maybe a small Cr bump, but no florid failure. except cardiomyopathy. - multiple pts here have had nl EF on formal Echo or POCUS at time of admit (or in a couple of cases EF 40ish, chronically). Also nl Tpn from ED. Then they get the horrible resp failure, sans sepsis or shock. Then they turn the corner, off Flolan, supined, vent weaning, looking good, never any pressor requirement. Then over 12hrs, newly cold, clamped, multiple-pressor shock that looks cardiogenic, EF 10% or less, then either VT->VF-> dead or PEA-> asystole in less than a day. Needless to say this is awful for families who had started to have hope. - We have actually had more asystole than VT, other facilities report more VT/VF, but same time course, a few days or a week after admit, around the time they're turning the corner. This occurs on med-surg pts too; one today who is elderly and chronically ill but baseline EF preserved, newly hypoTN overnight, EF<10. Already no escalation, has since passed, So presumably there is a viral CM aspect, which presents later in the course of dz. - of note, no WMAs on Echo, RV preserved, Tpns don't bump. Could be unrelated, but I've never seen anything like it before, esp in a pt who had been HD stable without sepsis.

Treatment -
- Remdesivir might work, some hosps have seen improvement with it quite rapidly, marked improvement in 1-3 days. ARDS trajectory is impressive with it, pts improve much more rapidly than expected in usual ARDS.
- Recommended course is 10d, but due to scarcity all hosps have stopped it when pt clinically out of the woods - none have continued >5d. It might cause LFT bump, but interestingly seem to bump (200s-ish) for a day or 2 after starting then rapidly back to normal - suggests not a primary toxic hepatitis.
- unfortunately, the Gilead compassionate use and trial programs require AST/ALT <5x normal, which is pretty much almost no actual COVID pts. Also CrCl>30, which is fine. CDC is working with Gilead to get LFT reqs changed now that we know this is a mild viral hepatitis.
-currently the Gilead trial is wrapping up, NIH trial still enrolling, some new trial soon to begin can't remember where.

- steroids are up in the air. In China usual clinical practice for all ARDS is high dose methylpred. Thus, ALL of their pts have had high dose methylpred. Some question whether this practice increases mortality.
- it is likely that it increases seconday VAP/HAP. China has had a high rate of drug resistant GNR HAP/VAP and fungal pna in these pts, with resulting increases mortality. We have seen none, even in the earlier pts who were vented for >10d before being bronched (prior to test availability, again it is not a great idea to bronch these pts now).
- unclear whether VAP-prevention strategies are also different, but wouldn't think so?
- Hong Kong is currently running an uncontrolled trial of HC 100IV Q8.
- general consensus here (in US among docs who have cared for COVID pts) is that steroids will do more harm than good, unless needed for other indications.
- many of our pts have COPD on ICS. Current consensus at Evergreen, after some observation & some clinical judgment, is to stop ICS if able, based on known data with other viral pneumonias and increased susceptibility to HAP. Thus far pts are tolerating that, no major issues with ventilating them that can't be managed with vent changes. We also have quite a few on AE-COPD/asthma doses of methylpred, so will be interesting to see how they do.

That's all I got for now. Will be skipping the next 2 CDC COVID calls as working Nights, but will call in again next week and keep you all posted.

Plz share info but preferably with no direct attribution as I need to remain employed"
Posted by ell_13
Member since Apr 2013
88021 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:17 am to
They were never going to be equal this early in the breakout of a new virus. Period. It could have been any new coronavirus. I don’t get how that’s news.
Posted by cooLStorybreaUx
Member since Aug 2014
600 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:22 am to
quote:

Look, 20,000 people have died in the US from flu this year... TWENTY THOUSAND....many more than that from car crashes. Do we shut the country down each year for the friggin flu?????? Stop all car driving???? Get rational...we have had what, 30 deaths in the US??
..21 of those from 1 Nursing home???
The high death rate is due to little to NO testing....low known morbidity shows a skewed mortality. When the final numbers are known a year from now I will ban bet you it will be less than 1%.
The media has lost all sense of reality and half this board has too.


What in the actual frick do car crashes have to do with the CoronaVirus? I'm not saying that there isn't an over reaction, I agree. I don't agree with downplaying this as some common cold. Think about this... You catch it and visit your grandmother, friend, co worker and cause their death. This is a fricking reality for many people who have/will run into this virus. Im not saying buy 50,000 rolls of toilet paper, that is stupid as shite (intended).
Posted by cooLStorybreaUx
Member since Aug 2014
600 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:26 am to
quote:

They were never going to be equal this early in the breakout of a new virus. Period. It could have been any new coronavirus. I don’t get how that’s news.


I'm not the one running around saying BuT tHe FlU iS mOrE dEaDlY. Is that not bullshite? Everyone keeps saying it like it's a fact.
Posted by Commander Data
Baton Rouge, La
Member since Dec 2016
7291 posts
Posted on 3/10/20 at 12:26 am to
Brother, we were just providing real time updates and factual information. We aren't screaming that everyone is going to die. You can participate in this thread without freaking out and panicking. You have completely made this thread unreadable. Good job.
Jump to page
Page First 476 477 478 479 480 ... 1190
Jump to page
first pageprev pagePage 478 of 1190Next pagelast page

Back to top
logoFollow TigerDroppings for LSU Football News
Follow us on X, Facebook and Instagram to get the latest updates on LSU Football and Recruiting.

FacebookXInstagram